“Gatekeeper or Crisis Manager? Coverage of "Lahad Datu" Conflict”

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Lahad Datu conflict also known as “Sabah standoff” conflict, is unforgettable tragedies until killed about 10 of Malaysian security personnel and impacted economic, social and emotion of citizens especially at Lahad Datu, Sabah. The objective of this research is to examine the portrayal of solution from Malaysian Government for the “Lahad Datu Crisis” through newspaper framing in Malaysian mainstream newspapers namely Utusan Malaysia, The Star, Sin Chew and Nanban daily. The measurement for the crisis response will be measure through few independent variables such as category of “Lahad Datu” news; between problem, solution, people or neutral category. The following independent variable is through the slants of news; whether news is slanted in positive, negative or neutral slant. With the assistance of “Situational Crisis Communication Theory”, this research employed a systematic quantitative content analysis to gather the data. Finding revealed that, category of solution appeared most in Utusan Malaysia, The Star, Sin Chew and Nanban daily and news in positive slants were covered in all the selected dailies. In providing responses for the crisis, Justification and Concern crisis response portrayed most, however, through Kruskal Wallis test, data found that The Star and Utusan Malaysia portrayed most of the Justification and Concern responses compare to Sin Chew daily and Nanban daily.

     

     


  • Keywords


    Lahad Datu Conflict; Crisis Response; Content Analysis

  • References


    1. [1] Coombs WT. Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.

      [2] Nacos B. Mass-mediated terrorism: The central role of the media in terrorism and counterterrorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2002.

      [3] Amahallawi W, Zanuddin H, editors. 50 days of war on innocent civilian: Ma'an news agency coverage of Israeli and Palestinian conflict. Asia International Multidisciplinary Conference; 2017; UTM Johor, Malaysia.

      [4] Coombs WT. Choosing the right words: The development of guidelines for the selection of the "appropriate" crisis-response strategies. Management Communication Quarterly. 1995;8(4):447-76.

      [5] Coombs WT. Conceptualizing crisis communication. In: Heath RL, O'Hair HD, editors. Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication. New York: Routledge; 2009. p. 7-12.

      [6] Norris P, Kern M, Just MR. Framing terrorism: The news media, the government, and the public: Psychology Press; 2003.

      [7] Kydd AH, Walter BF. The strategies of terrorism. International Security. 2006;31(1):49-80.

      [8] Kim J-Y. The study of international students' internet dependency. Korean Journal of Communication. 2008;16(4):185-204.

      [9] Coombs WT. Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2007.

      [10] Holladay SJ. Crisis communication strategies in the media coverage of chemical accidents. Journal of Public Relations Research. 2009;21(2):208-17.

      [11] Coombs WT. The protective powers of crisis response strategies: Managing reputational assets during a crisis. Journal of Promotion Management. 2006;12(3):241-60.

      [12] Valentini C, Romenti S. The press and Alitalia's 2008 crisis: Issues, tones, and frames. Public Relations Review. 2011;37(4):360-5.

      [13] Cheong JR, Zanuddin H, editors. Media attention for climate change mitigation and adaptation in Malaysia: A comparative analysis of Malaysia Chinese newspapers coverage. Asia International Multidisciplinary Conference; 2017; UTM Johor, Malaysia.

      [14] Selva J. Media planning guide Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Perception Media Sdn. Bhd; 2010.

      [15] Auerbach Y, Bloch-Elkon Y. Media Framing and Foreign Policy: The Elite Press vis-à-vis US Policy in Bosnia, 1992–95. Journal of Peace Research. 2005;42(1):83-99.

      [16] Druckman JN. The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political behavior. 2001;23(3):225-56.

      [17] Entman RM. Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of communication. 1993;43(4):51-8.

      [18] De Vreese CH. News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal & Document Design. 2005;13(1).

      [19] Hallahan K. Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of public relations research. 1999;11(3):205-42.

      [20] Semetko HA, Valkenburg PM. Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of communication. 2000;50(2):93-109.

      [21] Supadhiloke B. Framing the Sino–US–Thai relations in the post-global economic crisis. Public Relations Review. 2012;38(5):665-75.

      [22] Kiousis S. Explicating media salience: A factor analysis of New York Times issue coverage during the 2000 US presidential election. Journal of Communication. 2004;54(1):71-87.

      [23] Tankard JW. The empirical approach to the study of media framing. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001. 95-106 p.

      [24] Entman RM. Framing bias: Media in the distribution of power. Journal of communication. 2007;57(1):163-73.

      [25] Abdoulaye OK, Zanuddin H, editors. Online media's role in public health information and communication sharing in Cote d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast). AsiaInternational Multidisciplinary Conference; 2017; UTM Johor, Malaysia.

      [26] Watimin NH, Zanuddin H, editors. Managing crisis and response times analysis: The effectiveness of online monitoring strategy analysis in plaza low yat racial riots incident and bersih 4.0. . Asia International Multidisciplinary Conference; 2017; UTM Johor, Malaysia.

      [27] Chang PK. Comparison of media and source framing in selected Chinese newspaper stories on bilingual education issues in Malaysia. [Unpublished Doctoral of Philosophy's Thesis]. In press 2009.

      [28] Wimmer RD, Dominick JR. Mass media research: An introduction. Belmont: Wadsworth; 2013.

      [29] Dimitrova DV, Connolly-Ahern C. A tale of two wars: Framing analysis of online news sites in coalition countries and the Arab world during the Iraq war. The Howard Journal of Communications. 2007;18(2):153-68.

      [30] Yang LF, Ishak MSA. Framing interethnic conflict in malaysia: a comparative analysis of newspapers coverage on the hindu rights action force (HINDRAF). International Journal of Communication. 2012;6:24.

      [31] Aday S, Livingston S, Hebert M. Embedding the Truth: A cross-cultural analysis of objectivity and television coverage of the Iraq war. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics. 2005;10(1):3-21.

      [32] Dimitrova DV, Strömbäck J. Mission accomplished? Framing of the Iraq War in the elite newspapers in Sweden and the United States. Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands). 2005;67(5):399-417.

      [33] Zanuddin H, Ambikapathy M, editors. Visual framing of "Lahad Datu" conflict coverage in Malaysian mainstream newspapers. Asia International Multidisciplinary Conference; 2017; UTM Johor, Malaysia.

      [34] Choi J. A content analysis of BP's press releases dealing with crisis. Public Relations Review. 2012;38(3):422-9.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 17217
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.21.17217




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.