Gamification Framework and Achievement Motivation in Digital Era : Concept and Effectiveness

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract

    Students’ passive activities, such as reading and watching activity make learning process can't run well. Only active communication with their colleagues, facilitators, and other learning resources make process run well. In this case, we use gamification to improve student's learning motivation. This study used four scales to obtain consistent and measurable data. Scale 1 and 2 were to analyze the level of knowledge about gamification framework, Scale 3 for concept and effectiveness and Scale 4 for fun learning. In conclusion,  entrepreneurship courses through gamification runs effectively because students are interested in gamification because it is new for them and able to establish good communication patterns as well as makes students more literate on technology.



  • Keywords

    Gamification Framework; Achievement Motivation; Digital Era.

  • References

      [1] A. Rollings and E. Adams, Andrew Rollings and Ernest Adams on game design. New Riders, 2003.

      [2] W. A. Nelson, “Gagné and the new technologies of instruction,” Leg. Robert M. Gagné. New York Syracuse Univ., 2000.

      [3] R. M. Gagne, “The content analysis of subject-matter a dialogue between Robert M. Gagné and M. David Merrill,” Instr. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 1976.

      [4] R. M. Gagné, L. Briggs, and W. Wager, “The events of instruction,” Princ. Instr. Des., 1992.

      [5] J. Bransford, R. Sherwood, N. Vye, and J. Rieser, “Teaching thinking and problem solving: Research foundations.,” Am. Psychol., vol. 41, no. 10, p. 1078, 1986.

      [6] K. Seaborn and D. I. Fels, “Gamification in theory and action: A survey,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., vol. 74, pp. 14–31, 2015.

      [7] Y.-K. Chou, “Octalysis: Complete gamification framework,” Yu-Kai Chou Gamification, 2013.

      [8] E. Murray and L. J. Harrison, “The influence of being ready to learn on children’s early school literacy and numeracy achievement,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 529–545, 2011.

      [9] B. Weiner, H. Heckhausen, and W.-U. Meyer, “Causal ascriptions and achievement behavior: a conceptual analysis of effort and reanalysis of locus of control.,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 21, no. 2, p. 239, 1972.

      [10] S. E. Schoenherr, “History of television,” Retrieved Oct., vol. 28, p. 2006, 2004.

      [11] Wikipedia, “Digital,” Wikipedia Indonesia. 2017.

      [12] S. R. Hiltz, N. Coppola, N. Rotter, M. Turoff, and R. Benbunan-Fich, “Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN: A multi-measure, multi-method approach,” J. Asynchronous Learn. Networks, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 103–125, 2000.

      [13] F. J. M. Laros and J.-B. E. M. Steenkamp, “Emotions in consumer behavior: a hierarchical approach,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 1437–1445, 2005.

      [14] J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson, and R. L. Tatham, “Multivariate data analysis . Uppersaddle River,” Multivar. Data Anal. (5th ed) Up. Saddle River, 1998.

      [15] L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, Research methods in education. routledge, 2002.

      [16] J. P. Goetz and M. D. LeCompte, Etnografía y diseño cualitativo en investigación educativa. Ediciones Morata, 1988.




Article ID: 17487
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.6.17487

Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.