Reengineering the English Teacher Education Reform: Pro-ELT

  • Authors

    • Saiful Islam Ahmad Sukri
    • Melor Md. Yunus
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17548
  • Continuous professional development, English teachers’ language proficiency, In-service teacher training, Pro-ELT, Quality of Malaysian English teachers.
  • The explosion of in-service professional development programmes for English teachers is inevitable in the 21st century. Nevertheless, many English teachers across the globe are found linguistically deficient, thus jeopardizing the quality of English teaching as a whole. In spite of in-service professional development programme being the ubiquitous measure to leapfrog the quality of teachers, there is still no guarantee that it would combat the English teachers’ declining language proficiency. Thereby, this paper intends to survey the English teachers’ perceptions and the effectiveness of the Pro-ELT programme using the Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model. The findings indicated that Pro-ELT, on average, was effective in enhancing the English teachers’ language proficiency, Z=8.065, p< 0.05 with a very large size effect (r=0.77) but suffered from some criticisms. Most importantly, this study indicated that mandatory in-service programme, which often yielded negative results, was reacted favourably albeit its shortcomings. This therefore accentuates the significance of in-service English teachers’ professional development programme to remedy the language attrition, especially in a limited English-speaking milieu.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Aldaihani, H. A., Shuqair, K. M., Alotaibi, A. M., & Alrabah, S. (2015). Students’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the English program taught at the College of Technological Studies in Kuwait. English Language Teaching, 8(4), 80-89.

      [2] Ali, F. (2014). Implementing EIL Paradigm in ELT Classrooms: Voices of experienced and pre-service English language educators in Malaysia. In R. Marlina and R. A. Giri (Eds.), The pedagogy of English as an international language: Perspectives from scholars, teachers and students.Switzerland: Springer.

      [3] Ali, J., Eam, L. H., Ismail, R., Rahim, F, A., Isa, F. M., & Ismail, I. A. (2017). The effectiveness of Finishing School Programmes from the perspectives of graduates and employers. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 11(2014), 147-170.

      [4] Aryadoust, V. (2016). Adapting Levels 1 and 2 of Kirkpatrick’s model of training evaluation to examine the effectiveness of a tertiary-level writing course. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 1-29.

      [5] Azman, H. (2016). Implementation and Challenges of English Language Education Reform in Malaysian Primary Schools. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(3), 65-78.

      [6] Bernama. (2017). Malaysian students unable, unwilling to speak up: Ideas. Retrieved from https://www.nst.com.my/news/nation/2017/07/260832/malaysian-students unable- unwilling-speak-ideas

      [7] Bipinchandra, J. S., Shah, P. M., & Aziz, J. A. (2014). Proficiency standards of Melaka non-optionist in-service teachers. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(6), 110-117.

      [8] Cheung, Y. L. (2013). The impact of an in-service professional development course on writing teacher attitudes and pedagogy. Journal of Pedagogic Development, 3(1), 12-18.

      [9] Choong, K. F., Pillai, S., Yap, T., Cheok, O. L., & Sarna, A. S. (2015). Chapter 9: Teacher Education. In Z.M. Don (Ed.), English language education reform in Malaysia: The roadmap 2015-2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia.

      [10] Cimer, S. O., Çakır, I., & Cimer, A. (2010). Teachers’ views on the effectiveness of in-service courses on the new curriculum in Turkey. European Journal of Teacher Education, 33(1), 31-41.

      [11] Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Cambridge University Press.

      [12] Darusalam, G., Talib, O., & Idris, N. (2017). Programme Evaluation in Education & Social Science. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.

      [13] Dayoub, R., & Bashiruddin. A. (2012). Exploring English-language teachers’ professional development in developing countries: cases from Syria and Pakistan. Professional Development in Education, 38(4), 589-611.

      [14] Dixon, P. A. (2017). Extensive listening, teacher proficiency and 21st century skills: Interview with Dr. Willy A. Renandya. RELC Journal, 48(1), 153-158.

      [15] Ee, C. L. (2012). Cultural factors affecting English proficiency in rural areas. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 3(1), 1-22.

      [16] Embi, M. A., Long, J., & Hamzah, M. I. (2001). Language learning strategies employed by secondary school students in Malaysia. Jurnal Pendidikan, 26, 3-20.

      [17] English Language Standards & Quality Council. 2015. English language education reform in Malaysia: The roadmap 2015-2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia.

      [18] Enkin, E. (2015). Supporting the professional development of foreign language graduate students: A focus on course development and program direction. Foreign Language Annals, 48(2), 304-320

      [19] Eshtehardi, R. (2014). Pro-ELT: A teacher training blended approach. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(5), 106-110.

      [20] Freeman, D., Katz, A., Gomez, P. B., & Burns, A. (2015). English for teaching: Rethinking teacher proficiency in the classroom. ELT Journal, 69(2), 129-139.

      [21] Ghasemboland, F., & Hashim, F. (2013). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and their English language proficiency: A study of nonnative EFL teachers in selected language centres. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103, 890-899.

      [22] Ghasemi, B., & Hashemi, M. (2011). The study of the characteristics of successful English language teachers from the viewpoint of the English language students of Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28(2013), 411-415.

      [23] Gill, R. S. (2013). Enhancing English teacher language proficiency: The Malaysian experience. Retrieved from https://www.britishcouncil.or.th/sites/default/files/dr.ranjit.pdf

      [24] Giraldo, F. (2014). The impact of a professional development program on English language teachers’ classroom performance. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 16(1), 63-76.

      [25] Greimel, H. (2015). Honda to make English official language by 2020. Retrieved from http://www.autonews.com/article/20150703/OEM/150709942/honda-to- make-english-official-language-by-2020

      [26] Gulamhussein, A. (2013). Teaching the teachers: Effective professional development in an era of high stakes accountability. Retrieved from http://www.centerforpubliceducation.org/MainMenu/Staffingstudents/Tea ching-the Teachers-Effective-Professional-Development-in-an-Era-of-High-Stakes-Accountability/Teaching-the-Teachers-Full-Report.pdf

      [27] Griffiths, C. (2012). Focus on the teacher. ELT Journal, 66(4), 468-476.

      [28] Harwell, S. H. 2003.Teacher professional development: It’s not an event, it’s a process. Texas: CORD.

      [29] Henning, J. E., Rice, L. J., Dani, D. E., Weade, G., & McKeny, T. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions of their most significant change: source, impact, and process. Teacher Development, 21(3), 388-403.

      [30] Herdeiro, R., & e Silva, A. M. C. (2013). The quality of teaching and professional development of teachers: a Portuguese study. Teacher Development, 17(2), 176-194.

      [31] Hilton, G., Flores, M. A., & Niklasson, L. (2013). Teacher quality, professionalism and professional development: Findings from a European project. Teacher Development, 17(4), 431-447.

      [32] Iber, G. (2016). English language learning in the Malaysian school setting: Where can we find 10, 000 hours? A theoretical perspective. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7(4), 46-50.

      [33] Inoi, S. (2011). A report of in- service teacher training on elementary school foreign language activities in the teaching certificate renewal program at Ibaraki University. Studies in Teaching Strategies Ibaraki University, 30, 123-135.

      [34] Jalil, H. (2016). Compulsory pass in English for SPM postponed. Retrieved from http://www.thesundaily.my/news/1731435

      [35] Jalleh, J. (2012). Majority of teachers are not proficient in English. Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2012/09/26/majority-of-teachers-not-proficient- in-english/

      [36] James, B. (2015). Thai English proficiency drops, now 3rd worst in Asia – EF. Retrieved from https://www.bangkokpost.com/learning/learning news/756536/thai-english-proficiency-drops-now-3rd-worst-in-asia-ef

      [37] Johorean Teachers. (2013). Teachers' letter of complaint: Aptis examination result 2013 [Letter written April 22, 2013 to Ranjit Singh Gill]. Retrieved from nutp.org/new/sites/default/files/20130425111352.pdf

      [38] Kaur, P. (2015, December). Upskilling English teachers in Malaysia: A critical pedagogy perspective. Paper presented at 2nd International Conference on Language, Education, Humanities and Innovation, Kuala Lumpur Malaysia.

      [39] Kepol, N. (2017). Quality Malaysian English language teachers: Examining a policy strategy. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 187-209.

      [40] Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2005). Evaluating training programs. (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

      [41] Koru, J., & Akesson, S. (2011). Turkey's English Deficit. Retrieved from http://www.tepav.org.tr/en/yayin/s/466

      [42] Krugel, R., & Fourie, E. (2014). Concerns for the language skills of South African learners and their teachers. Int J Edu Sci, 7(1), 219-228.

      [43] Ladin, H. H., & Aziz, M. S. A. (2017, April). The implementation of CEFR in Malaysia: Issues and challenges. Paper presented at 6th International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, Bangi Malaysia.

      [44] Lee, B. H., Abdullah, M. H., Shapii, A., Yong, W. Y., Raman, C., Omar, M. N., & Cyril, R. J. (2015). Chapter 5: Primary. In Z.M. Don (Ed.), English language education reform in Malaysia: The roadmap 2015-2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia.

      [45] Lee, K. Y. (2011). Speech by Mr Lee Kuan Yew, Former Minister Mentor and current Senior Advisor to Government of Singapore Investment Corporation at the launch of the English Language Institute of Singapore (ELIS) at the Marina Bay Sands Expo and Convention Centre. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2011/09/06/speech-by-mr-lee-kuan-yew-at-elislaunch.php.

      [46] Lim, H. P. (2017). TN50 dialogue: Abg Jo takes a dig at Man-glish. The Borneo Post. http://www.theborneopost.com/2017/03/12/tn50-dialogue-abg-jo-takes-a-dig- at- man-glish/ [13 March 2017].

      [47] Lima, D. C. D. (2001). English-as-a-foreign-language teacher-training programs: An overview. Linguagem &Ensino, 4(2), 143-153.

      [48] Loh, C. E., & Liew, W. M. (2016). Voices from the ground: The emotional labour of English teachers’ work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 267-278.

      [49] Malakolunthu, S., Idris, A. R., & Rengasamy, N. C. (2010). Teacher professional experience and performance: Impact of the work environment and general welfare in Malaysian secondary schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 609-617.

      [50] Meng, Y. T., & Moses, S. (2017). Chapter 6: Teachers and teaching in Malaysia. In M. Samuel., M. Y. Tee & L. P. Symaco (Eds.), Education in Malaysia: Developments and challenges. Singapore: Springer Nature.

      [51] Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2011). Pedagogy standards for English language teaching. Kuala Lumpur: English Language Teaching Centre.

      [52] Miyazato, K. (2015). In-service training for teaching English in elementary schools in Japan. In JALT2014—Conversations across borders. Conference proceedings (pp.143-154), ISBN 978-4-901352-47-5.

      [53] Moidunny, K. (2009). The effectiveness of National Professional Qualification for Headship Programme. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.

      [54] Musa, N, C., Koo, Y. L., & Azman, H. (2012). Exploring English language learning and teaching in Malaysia. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 39-51.

      [55] Naj. (2017). Our English proficiency is declining that some youngsters don’t know what 'ugly' means. Retrieved from malaysiandigest.com/frontpage/282-main-tile/702280-our-english-proficiency-is-declining-that-some-youngsters-don-t-know-what-ugly-means.html

      [56] Nguyen, H. T. M. (2017). Models of mentoring in language teacher education. Switzerland: Springer Nature.

      [57] Nhung, P. T. H. (2017). General English proficiency or English for Teaching? The preferences of in-service teachers. RELC Journal, 1-14.

      [58] Nicolaidis, K., & Mattheoudakis, M. (2008). Utopia vs reality: The effectiveness of in-service training courses for EFL teachers. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(3), 279- 292.

      [59] Njagi, M. W., Muriungi, C. K., & Peter, C. A. (2014). Effectiveness of professional development on English and literature teachers in selected schools in Tharaka-Nithi and Meru County, Kenya. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 4(8), 142-148.

      [60] Noom-ura, S. (2013). English-teaching problems in Thailand and Thai teachers’ professional development needs. English Language Teaching, 6(11), 139-147.

      [61] Oder, T. (2014). English language teachers’ perceptions of professional teaching. Teacher Development, 18(4), 482-494.

      [62] OECD. (2014). TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning. Paris:TALIS, OECD Publishing.

      [63] OECD (2016). OECD economic surveys: Malaysia economic assessment. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/economic-survey-malaysia.htm

      [64] Özbilgin, A., Erkmen, B. & Karaman, A. C. (2016). English language teacher professional development: When institutional frameworks fall short. The Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 17(1), 55-65.

      [65] Praslova, L. (2010). Adaptation of Kirkpatrick’s four level model of training criteria to assessment of learning outcomes and program evaluation in Higher Education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability, 22, 215–225.

      [66] Patton, K., Parker, M., & Tannehill, D. (2015). Helping teachers help themselves: Professional development that makes a difference. NASSP Bulletin, 99(1), 26-42.

      [67] Pawlak, M. (2011). The role of in-service training for language teachers in the domain of language competence. An International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 38, 21-30.

      [68] Piaw, C. Y. 2014. Asas statistik penyelidikan. Malaysia: Mc Graw Hill Education.

      [69] Richards, H., Conway, C., Roskvist, A., & Harvey, S. (2013). Foreign language teachers’ language proficiency and their teaching practice. The Language Learning Journal, 41(2), 231-246.

      [70] Romli, N. H., & Aziz, M. S. A. (2015). The use of Bahasa Melayu in the English language classroom by “non -optionist†English teachers. Procedia Behavioral Sciences, 172, 770-777.

      [71] Royle, K. (2009). The so-what factor...impact evaluation strategies for teacher educators. Retrieved from https://www.wlv.ac.uk/media/wlv/pdf/sed-res-ict-sowhat.pdf

      [72] Salehi, H., Davari, A., & Yunus, M. M. (2015). Evaluation of an ESP course of Qur’anic sciences and tradition. International Education Studies, 8(1), 29-37.

      [73] Shanmugam, M. (2017). Unemployment among graduates needs to be sorted out fast. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2017/03/25/unemployment- among-graduates-needs-to-sorted-out-fast/

      [74] Shisahavan, H. B., & Sadeghi, K. (2009). Characteristics of an effective English language teacher as perceived by Iranian teachers and learners of English. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 130-143.

      [75] Steele, D., & Rong, Z. (2016). Enhancement of Teacher Training: Key to improvement of English education in Japan. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217, 16-25.

      [76] Sukri, S. I. A., Yunus, M. M., & Rahman, H. A. (2017, September). Pro-ELT: The unheard voices of English teachers. Paper presented at 8th Regional Seminar on Optimising the 21st Century Educational Research, Bangi Malaysia.

      [77] Swee, P. C. G., Saad, N. S., & Kung, T. W. (2012). The “voices†of beginning teachers in Malaysia about their conceptions of competency: a phenomenographic investigation. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(7), 58-70.

      [78] Tagg, B. (2016). Grassroots Teacher Education Initiatives in Malaysia: An Intercultural Self- Study. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 175-195.

      [79] Tan, A-L., Chang, C-H., & Teng, P. (2015). Tensions and dilemmas in teacher professional development. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1583-1591.

      [80] The British Council. (2013). Pro-ELT end of course feedback. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/297343627/Pro-ELT-End-of-Course- Feedback

      [81] Valmori, L., & Costa, P. I. D. (2016). How do foreign language teachers maintain their proficiency? A grounded investigation. System, 57(2016), 98-108.

      [82] Wan, W-Y, S. (2013). Hong Kong’s teachers’ professional development. In E.H.F. Law & C. Li (Eds.), Curriculum innovations in changing societies (pp. 493-508). AW Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

      [83] Wati, H. (2011). The effectiveness of Indonesian English teachers training programs in improving confidence and motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 4(1), 79- 104.

      [84] Widodo, A., & Riandi. (2013). Dual-mode teacher professional development: challenges and re-visioning future TPD in Indonesia. Teacher Development, 17(3), 380-392.

      [85] Wyatt, M., & Ager, E. O. (2016). Teachers’ cognition regarding continuing professional development. ELT Journal, 71(2), 171-185.

      [86] Yavuz, A., & Topkaya, E. Z. (2013). Teacher educators’ evaluation of the English language teaching programme: A Turkish case. Novitas –ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 7(1), 64-83.

      [87] Yesuiah, S. (2016). Be fair to English language teachers. Retrieved from https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2016/03/26/be-fair-to-english- language- teachers/

      [88] Yeung, P. (2013). Teacher training is key to improving Hong Kong's English language skills. Retrieved from http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/1310379/teacher- training-key-improving-hongkongs-english-language

      [89] Young, J. W., Freeman, D., Hauck, M. C., Gomez, P. G., & Papageorgiou, S. (2014). A design framework for the ELTeach program assessments. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(2), 1-29.

      [90] Yunus, M. M., & Sukri, S.I.A. (2017). The use of English in teaching Mathematics and Science: The PPSMI policy vis- Ã -vis the DLP. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(1), 133-142.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Islam Ahmad Sukri, S., & Md. Yunus, M. (2018). Reengineering the English Teacher Education Reform: Pro-ELT. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.25), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17548