Community Aspiration Services from Perspectives Transparency, Accountability, and Equal Rights: Study on Representatives of West Java People

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    This study discusses the performance of local legislative councils in the distribution of community efforts in West Java, Indonesia. The performance of Board members relates to transparency, accountability and equality. Using descriptive-qualitative methods, the review of this study found that the members of the Provincial Council always performed their duties as elected representatives to serve the community. For example, members of the Provincial Council absorb and collect voters' aspirations through regular working visits; Adapting and pursuing aspirations and grievances and providing a moral and political electoral constituency. All of that they do with transparent, accountable, and consider the equality of rights. Based on public opinion, the quality of service to the public provided by West Java Parliament is still fluctuating, meaning it is still up and down. However, it indicates the openness in its processes.

     

     


  • Keywords


    Regional House of Representatives; West Java Province; Political Aspirations

  • References


    1. [1] Heywood A. Key concepts in politics: Macmillan; 2000.

      [2] Wahidin S. Konseptualisasi dan Perjalanan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar; 2011.

      [3] Pahlevi I. Dinamika Sistem Pemilu Masa transisi di Indonesia. Jurnal Politica. 2016;5(2).

      [4] Dahl RA. Democracy and its Critics: Yale University Press; 1989.

      [5] Sanit A. Perwakilan politik di Indonesia: Rajawali; 1985.

      [6] Budiardjo M. Dasar-dasar ilmu politik: Gramedia pustaka utama; 2003.

      [7] Napitupulu P. Menuju pemerintahan perwakilan: Alumni; 2007.

      [8] Rusadi K. Sistem Politik Indonesia. Sinar Baru, Bandung. 1988.

      [9] Pitkin HF. The concept of representation: Univ of California Press; 1967.

      [10] Rahman A. HI 2007. Sistem Politik Indonesia Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu. 2007.

      [11] Krina P, Lalolo L. Indikator & Alat Ukur Prinsip Akuntabilitas, Transparansi & Partisipasi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Good Public Governance Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. 2003.

      [12] Didjaja M. Transparansi Pemerintah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 2003.

      [13] Kristiansen S. Decentralising education in Indonesia. International journal of educational development. 2006;26(5):513-31.

      [14] Rasul S. Pengintegrasian Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja dan Anggaran. Jakarta: Detail Rekod. 2002.

      [15] Tjokroamidjojo B. Administrasi Publik. Jakarta: RadjaGrafindo Persada. 2001.

      [16] Solihin D. Penerapan Good Governance di Sektor Publik untuk Meningkatkan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Lembaga Publik. Vol, No, hlm. 2007.

      [17] Mariana D. Otonomi Daerah dan Inovasi Kebijakan. Governance (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan). 2010;1(1):13-20.

      [18] Locke J. The Works of John Locke: Thomas Tegg; 1823.

      [19] Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Sage publications; 2017.

      [20] Lincoln YS, Egon EG. Lincoln, Yvonne S., and Egan G. Egon," Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences," pp. 163-188 in Norman K. Denzin and Yvonne S. Lincoln, eds., The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2000. 2000.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 17732
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17732




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.