Community Aspiration Services from Perspectives Transparency, Accountability, and Equal Rights: Study on Representatives of Java West People

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    This study discusses the performance of local legislative councils in serving the distribution of community aspirations in West Java, Indonesia. The performance of the board members is viewed in terms of transparency, accountability, and equality. With descriptive-qualitative methods, the review of this study found that in order to perform their functions as elected representatives, provincial council members always provided their time to serve the community. According to the fact, members of the provincial council, among others, absorb and collect the aspirations of constituents through regular working visits; accommodate and follow up on aspirations and complaints, and provide a moral and political constituency to constituents. All of that they do with transparent, accountable, and consider the equality of rights. Based on public opinion, the quality of service to the public provided by West Java Parliament is still fluctuating, meaning it is still up and down. However, it indicates the openness in its processes.

     

     


  • Keywords


    Regional House of Representatives; West Java Province; Political Aspirations

  • References


    1. [1] Heywood A. Key concepts in politics: Macmillan; 2000.

      [2] Wahidin S. Konseptualisasi dan Perjalanan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia: Pustaka Pelajar; 2011.

      [3] Dahl RA. Democracy and its Critics: Yale University Press; 1989.

      [4] Sanit A. Ormas dan politik: Lembaga Studi Informasi Pembangunan; 1995.

      [5] Budiardjo M. †œDasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik―. GramediaPustakaUtama 2008 Jakarta. 2008.

      [6] Napitupulu P. Pelayanan Publik & Customer Satisfaction, Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Agar Pelayanan Publik Lebih Berorientasi Pada Kepuasan dan Kepentingan Masyarakat. Bandung: PT Alumni. 2007.

      [7] Rusadi K. Sistem Politik Indonesia. Sinar Baru, Bandung; 1988.

      [8] Pitkin HF. The concept of representation: Univ of California Press; 1967.

      [9] Rahman A. Sistem Politik Indonesia: Penerbit SIC kerjasama dengan LPM IKIP Surabaya; 2007.

      [10] Krina LL, Lalolo L. Indikator & Alat Ukur Prinsip Akuntabilitas, Transparansi & Partisipasi. Jakarta: Sekretariat Good Public Governance Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. 2003.

      [11] Didjaja M. Transparansi Pemerintah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 2003.

      [12] Kristiansen S, Santoso P. Surviving decentralisation?: Impacts of regional autonomy on health service provision in Indonesia. Health Policy. 2006;77(3):247-59.

      [13] Rasul S. Pengintegrasian Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja dan Anggaran. Jakarta: Detail Rekod. 2002.

      [14] Tjokroamidjojo B. Good governance: paradigma baru manajemen pembangunan: Lembaga Administrasi Negara, Republik Indonesia; 2001.

      [15] Solihin D. Penerapan Good Governance di Sektor Publik untuk Meningkatkan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Lembaga Publik. Vol, No, hlm. 2007.

      [16] Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches: Sage publications; 2017.

      [17] Lincoln YS, Lynham SA, Guba EG. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 2011;4:97-128.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 17796
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17796




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.