UCE Program and 3D Students Development

  • Authors

    • Khairunesa Isa
    • Mohamad Zaky Noh
    • Siti Sarawati Johar
    • Rosman Md Yusoff
    • Abd Rahman Ahmad
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17824
  • UCE, Development, Empowerment, Cognitive, Affective, Psychomotor

  • Abstract

    The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of the application of University Community Engagement (UCE) on the development of 3D students of Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. A total of 10 students from various fields of study who are in the background of engineering flow have joined UCE. This review is more emphasis on the consistency of the elements contained in the UCE curriculum with the holistic development of students from the cognitive, affective and psychomotor perspectives. The impact of this UCE implementation can also be expressed in students. UCE is a program that emphasizes the concept of development and empowerment to produce future generations as true leaders. The program that has been collaborating with UGM has given the students the opportunity to directly participate in the project implementation on selected communities. Because of the observations found, based on the activities performed by the students have gone through each level for each specified domain. This has a positive impact on student development. Hence the concept of UCE can be used as a foundation in the development of the 3D Student Development Model concept framework.

     

  • References

    2. style='font-size:8.0pt'>
    3. style='mso-spacerun:yes'> ADDIN EN.REFLIST
    4. field-separator'>[1] Yusof R, Othman N, Karim F. Strategi pembelajaran pengalaman berasaskan model kolb dalam pendidikan perakaunan. Jurnal pendidikan. 2005;30:113-28.

      [2] Ismail A, Mohamed HA-B, Sulaiman AZ, Mohamad MH, Yusuf MH. An empirical study of the relationship between transformational leadership, empowerment and organizational commitment. Business and Economics Research Journal. 2011;2(1):89.

      [3] Furco A, Billig SH. Service learning: The essence of the pedagogy: IAP; 2002.

      [4] Bloom BS. Engelhart, MD, Furst, EJ, Hill, WH, & Krathwohl, DR (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. 1989.

      [5] Naidoo V. Project Based Learning (PBL): An Innovative Vehicle for the Assessment of Student Learning in the Science Calssroom: Curtin University of Technology.; 2010.

      [6] Kaldi S, Filippatou D, Govaris C. Project-based learning in primary schools: effects on pupils' learning and attitudes. Education 3–13. 2011;39(1):35-47.

      [7] Papanikolaou K, Boubouka M. Promoting collaboration in a project-based e-learning context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2010;43(2):135-55.

      [8] Roessingh H, Chambers W. Project-based learning and pedagogy in teacher preparation: Staking out the theoretical mid-ground. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 2011;23(1):60-71.

      [9] Vygotsky L. Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children. 1978;23(3):34-41.

    5. mso-fareast-font-family:Batang;mso-ansi-language:EN-US;mso-fareast-language:
    6. KO;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'>

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Isa, K., Zaky Noh, M., Sarawati Johar, S., Md Yusoff, R., & Rahman Ahmad, A. (2018). UCE Program and 3D Students Development. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.25), 685-688. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17824

    Received date: 2018-08-18

    Accepted date: 2018-08-18