Perseverance to the Quandaries of Sustainable Development

  • Authors

    • Surabhi Lakshmi
    • Azara .
    2018-07-20
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.12.17872
  • Human System, Environment, Sustainability, Methods and Tools, SustainabilityManagement.

  • Abstract

    The paper demonstrates that condition is one of the fundamental open property of a human framework and consequently, it must be exclusively kept. As per our present mindfulness, the manageability is basic for every single human framework and it is important to raise the economic advancement standards in all human framework property. Reasonable improvement is characterized as advancement that addresses the issues of the present without bargaining the capacity of future eras to address their own issues. The paper accentuation on the variables influencing supportable improvement, conditions for maintainable advancement, strategies and procedures to take care of the ecological issues and the assignments of official administration in the natural segment.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Alex, L. (2009). Breaking the Model: Women, Men and Time in the Corporate World. New York: The Free Press.

      [2] Biefhoff, H.W.(2010), Cohen, R.L., Greenberg, J. (Eds), Justice in Social Relations, Plenum, New York, NY,

      [3] Barney, J. (2009), looking inside for competitive advantage Academy of Management Executive, pp. 49-81.

      [4] Bowles, M.L., Coates. G. (2011), Image and substance; the management of performance as rhetoric or reality?Personnel Review, (2) pp.3-21.

      [5] Bretz, R.D. Jr, Milkovich, G.T., Read, W. (2009), the current state of performance appraisal research and practice concerns, directions, and implications, Journal of Management

      [6] Crossman, A. (2008), “Exploring the dynamics of the psychological contractâ€, Proceedings of the British Academy of the Management Conference.

      [7] Davis, T., Landa, M. (2011), a country look at employee performance appraisal, Canadian Manager, (3) pp.18-21.

      [8] Delery, J.E., Doty, D.H. (2012), Modes of theorizing in strategic human resourcemanagement; tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions, Academy of Management Journal, (4) pp.802-35.

      [9] Deming, E. (2011), Out of the Crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Engineering, Cambridge, MA,

      [10] Deal, T.E. & Kennedy A.A (2010). Corporate Cultures, Addison- Wesley, Reading, A.

      [11] Hamblin D. (1996). What difference does your industry make? International Journal of ProductionEconomics Elsevier Science, B.V., p 221

      [12] Kakati M. (1997). Strategic evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology International Journal ofProduction Economics Elsevier Science B.V., p 142

      [13] Ketokivi M, R. Schroeder. (2004). Strategic, structural contingency end institutional explanations in theadoption of innovative manufacturing practices. Journal of Operations Management, Elsevier Science,v22, pp63-89

      [14] McKay K. N. (2003). Historical survey of manufacturing control practices from a production researchperspective. International Journal of Production Research, vol. 41 n.3. Taylor and Francis LTD. LondresGB, pp 411-426

      [15] Quezada Luis, Felisa M. Cordova, Serge Widmer, Christopher O’Brien. (1999). A methodology forformulating a business strategy in manufacturing firms International Journal of Production Economics,n. 61-62, p. 87-94

      [16] Robb David J., Bin Xie. (2001). A survey of manufacturing strategies in China-based enterprises, Int. J.Production Economics, n.72, pp.181-189

      [17] Skinner W, 1969 Manufacturing-the missing link in corporate strategy, HBR, p136-145

      [18] Swamidaass, P.M., M.A. Waller. (1991). A classification of approaches to planning and justifying newmanufacturing technologies Journal of Manuf. Systems, pp 181-183

      [19] St. John Caron, Alan R. Cannon, Richard W. Pouder. (2001). Change drivers in the new millennium:implications for manufacturing strategy research, Journal of Operations Management, n. 19, pp. 143-160

      [20] Pradip Kumar Krishnadevarajan, S. Balasubramanian, N. Kannan and VigneshRavichandran, A Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Inventory Management. International Journal of Management (IJM),7(1), 2016, pp.85-93.

      [21] Tracey Michael, Mark Vonderembse; Jeen-Su Lim. (1999). Mfg. technology and strategy formulation:Keys to enhancing competitiveness and improving performance. Journal of Operations Management,n.17, pp. 411-428

      [22] Voss Chris, Kate Blackmon. (1998). Differences in manufacturing strategy decisions between Japaneseand Western manufacturing plants: the role of strategic time operation, Journal Operations Management,n.16, pp.147-158

      [23] VigneshRavichandran, Pradip Kumar, Krishnadevarajan, S. Balasubramanian and N. Kannan, SupplierPerformance Management – A Case Study of a Manufacturer. International Journal of Management(IJM), 6(10), 2015, pp.18-26.

      [24] Wierzbicki A.P. (1997). On the role of intuition in decision making and some ways of multicriterial aid of intuition. Journal of multicriterial decision analysis John Wiley and sons, LTD, issue 2.

      [25] Bailey, K. D. (1994). Methods of social research (4 ed.). New York: The Free Press. Bertram, C. (2011, June 3). Rushing curriculum reform again, Mail and Guardian.

      [26] Blatchford, P., Russel, A., Bassett, P.B., & Martin, C. (2007). The effect of class size on the teaching of pupils aged 7-11 years. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(2), 147-172.

      [27] Christiaans, D. J. (2006). Empowering teachers to implement the life orientation learning area in the senior phase of the general education and training band. Master of Education, University of Stellenbosch.

      [28] Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (4 ed.). New York: Routledge.

      [29] Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6 ed.). New York: Routledge.

      [30] Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7 ed.). Canada: Routledge.

      [31] Creswell, J. (2008). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3 ed.). Lincoln: Sage.

      [32] Cross, M., Mungadi, R., &Rouhani,S. (2002). From policy to practice:curriculum reforms in South African education. Comparative Education, 38(2), 171-187.

      [33] Davis, H. C. (2009). Curriculum improvement:The teacher perspective on change in the classroom. Doctor of Education, University of Montana, Missoula.

      [34] De Vos, A. S., Strydom, H., Fouche, C.D., &Delport, C.S.L. (2005). Research at grassroots for the social sciences and human service professions. Pretoria: Van Schaik.

      [35] Denscombe, M. (2003). The good research guide (2 ed.). Philadelphia: Open University Press.

      [36] Department of Basic Education. (2011a). Curriculum and assessment policy statement grades R-3: Lifeskills. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.

      [37] Goodson, I. F. (2001). Social histories of educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 2, 45-63.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Lakshmi, S., & ., A. (2018). Perseverance to the Quandaries of Sustainable Development. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.12), 1286-1288. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.12.17872

    Received date: 2018-08-19

    Accepted date: 2018-08-19

    Published date: 2018-07-20