Effect of electromagnetic interference shield on package and PCB
-
2019-06-30 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.17963 -
Electromagnetic Interference, Coupling, Metal Shield, Package, S-Parameter. -
Abstract
In this work, the effect of metal shield of ball grid array package on electromagnetic coupling is analysed. To compare the electromagnetic coupling between the packages on a printed circuit board, two test vehicles are presented. All vehicles have a metal shield overall surface of their package with the exception of their bottom side. One vehicle connects the metal shield to the ground plane. However, the other does not connect between those. Electromagnetic coupling simulations for two test vehicles are performed with frequency range from 10 MHz to 15 GHz. Electrical field distributions of the test vehicles are also calculated. From the calculation results, the metal shield structure in this work can reduce effectively the electromagnetic coupling between the packages from the frequency range of 11 GHz to 15 GHz. Connecting the metal shield on the package to the ground plane provides better electromagnetic interference between the packages.
Â
Â
-
References
[1] J. Pettit, Alman Law, Alex Brewer, and John Moore, “High Volume EMI-Shielding Process for LGA and BGA Componentsâ€, Electronics Packaging and Technology Conference, (2015), pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/EPTC.2015.7412379.
[2] M. D. Rotaru, Y. Rui, N. Do and M. Mechaik, “EMI simulation and measurements of multilayer structures for microprocessor packaging applicationsâ€, Electronic Packaging Technology Conference, (2005), pp. 826-831.
[3] Yu-Fei Shu,Xing-Chang We, Xue-Quan Yu,Chen-Jun Liu, “Effects of grounded-lid apertures for package-level electromagnetic interference (EMI) shieldingâ€, International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility & Signal/Power Integrity, (2017), pp. 345- 348. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2017.8077892.
[4] Nozad Karim, Jingkun Mao, Jun FanM, “Improving Electromagnetic Compatibility Performance of Packages and SiP Modules Using a Conformal Shielding Solutionâ€, Asia-Pacific International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, (2010), pp. 56-59. https://doi.org/10.1109/APEMC.2010.5475724.
[5] Xinpei Cao, Andrew Sun, Dan Maslyk, Junbo Gao, Qizhuo Zhuo, Jinu Choi, “Effective EMI shielding for semiconductor packages through novel conformal coatingâ€, China Semiconductor Technology International Conference, (2018), pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSTIC.2018.8369292.
[6] Liao Kuo-Hsien, Alex Chi-Hong Chan, Shen Chia Hsien, Lin I-Chia, Huang Hsin Wen, “Novel EMI Shielding Methodology on Highly Integration SiP Moduleâ€, Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, (2012), pp. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSJ.2012.6523433.
[7] Kenichiroh Mukai, Tafadzwa Magaya, Brian Eastep, Kwonil Kim, Lee Gaherty, Anirudh Kashyap, “A new reliable adhesion enhancement process for directly plating on molding compounds for package level EMI shieldingâ€, International Microsystems, Packaging, Assembly and Circuits Technology Conference, (2015), pp. 200 -203. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMPACT.2015.7365254.
[8] Feng-Cheng Chang, Kuan-Wen Cheng, Sung-Mao Wu, “EMI reducing solution by modify EBG structure for stacked packagingâ€, Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, (2009), pp. 524-527. https://doi.org/10.1109/EPTC.2009.5416493.
[9] Nick K. H. Huang, Li Jun Jiang, Huichun Yu, Gang Li, Shuai Xu, Huasheng Ren, “Fundamental Components of the IC Packaging Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Analysisâ€, Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, (2012), pp. 141-144. https://doi.org/10.1109/EPEPS.2012.6457861.
[10] Sayed Mobin, Gokul Kumar, Daniel N. de Araujo, Steve McKinney, “EMI modeling and correlation in a highly integrated package designâ€, Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, (2016), pp. 111-114. https://doi.org/10.1109/EPEPS.2016.7835430.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Kim, M. (2019). Effect of electromagnetic interference shield on package and PCB. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 6398-6401. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.17963Received date: 2018-08-29
Accepted date: 2019-05-24
Published date: 2019-06-30