Forbidding the Tragedy of Commons; Conserving Indigenous Knowledge through Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities Entitlement for Future Generations from the Perspectives of Intergeneration Justice
-
2018-08-24 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18210 -
Indigenous Peoples, Entitlement, Intergeneration Justice, Traditional Knowledge, Jurisprudence. -
Abstract
Conserving indigenous knowledge (IK) has long been discussed in international fore for more than five decade. The core issues is there is unanimity among scholars, governments, indigenous peoples and local communities on whether and how issue of IK could be harmonise within intellectual property rights law framework particularly copyrights. This paper aims to highlight the issues of conserving indigenous knowledge since indigenous knowledge does not belong to one generation but all generations. Discussion will embark on from the perspective of intellectual property jurisprudence through the works of Henry Reynolds, James Tully and Will Kymlicka. The outcome of this paper demonstrates promising thought into the role of intergeneration justice in protecting indigenous peoples in Malaysia. It is the contention of this paper that perhaps such conditions could apply to traditional knowledge too in addressing the plight of indigenous peoples.
Â
-
References
[1] Ostrom, E (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[2] Anderson JE (2009), Law Knowledge Culture. Cheltenham UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
[3] Reynolds H (1992), The Law of The Land .New York: Penguin Books.
[4] Tully J (1980), A discourse on Property: John Locke and his Adversaries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[5] Tully J (1994), “Rediscovering America: the two Treaties and Aboriginal Rights.†In G.A. Rodgers ed., Locke’s Philosophy: Content and context. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[6] Tully J (1994), “Aboriginal property and Western theory: rediscovering a Middle Ground,†Social Philosophy and Policy II, 153-180.
[7] Tully J (1996), Stranger Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in the Age of Diversity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Kymlicka W (1994), “Individual autonomy and community rights†in J. Backer ed., Group Rights. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
[9] Kymlicka W (1989), Liberalism, Community and Culture. Oxford; Clarendon Press.
[10] Kymlicka W (1996), Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[11] Directive 2004/24/EC (2004), The European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March, Article 16c(1)(c), amending as regards traditional herbal medicinal products.
[12] Directive 2001/83/EC (2004), On reference to the Community code relating to the medicinal product for human use [OJ l 136/85, 87.
[13] The Portugal Decree Law No.118/2002. (2002) (05 May 2018), http://193.5.93.81/wipolex/es/text.jsp?file_id=206632#LinkTarget_94
[14] The Brazilian Statue (2001), ( Provisional Measure(PM) 2, 186-16, 23 August. Art 7 (II).
[15] sWorld Intellectual Property Organisations (2004), – Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge ‘WIPO/GRIKF/IC/7/6 (Seventh Session, Geneva, November 1 to 5) Annex 1, 18-19.
[16] Bernard O’ Connor (2005), ‘Protecting Traditional Knowledge: An Overview of Developing Area of Intellectual Property Law’ (2005) 6/5 The Journal of World Intellectual Property 677-678.
[17] Rohaida Nordin, Kamal Halili Hassan & Zinatul A Zainol (2012), “Traditional Knowledge Documentation: Preventing or Promoting Biopiracyâ€. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities 20(S) 11-22.
[18] Muhamad Sayuti Hassan@ Yahya & Rohaida Nordin (2017) “Historu of Rights to Self-Determination of Indigenous Peoples Under International Law†Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat, Special Issue 1-8.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Mohd Khalid, A.-H., Nordi, R., & Mohd Hussein, S. (2018). Forbidding the Tragedy of Commons; Conserving Indigenous Knowledge through Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities Entitlement for Future Generations from the Perspectives of Intergeneration Justice. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.30), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18210Received date: 2018-08-25
Accepted date: 2018-08-25
Published date: 2018-08-24