Preserving a Healthy Ecohydrology: a Legal Perspective

  • Authors

    • Rasyikah Md Khalid
    • Ainul Jaria Maidin
    • Siti Sarah Sulaiman
    2018-08-24
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18221
  • Ecohydrology, Ecosystem Service, Equity, Ethics, Human Right, Jurisprudence.

  • Abstract

    Ecohydrology focuses on ecological processes within the hydrological cycle. It works under the assumption that an anthropogenically modified catchment or river basin can reverse environmental degradation and enhance the ecosystem service through improved climate cycle, controls erosion, soil formation, water purification, waste treatment and food production. Improved ecosystem services within the hydrological cycle can also serves human’s cultural and spiritual aspect as well as in the production of scientific knowledge. There has been call for countries to regulate the use of ecosystem as they are being degraded faster than they can recover. In 2001, the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) initiated the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) to assess the consequences of ecosystem change for human well-being. It finds that 60% of 24 ecosystem services examined such as clean water, food, forest products, flood control and provision of natural resources has been badly degraded due to unsustainable development. It is submitted that law can play a role in ensuring preservation of a healthy ecohydrology as a tool used by respective authorities to achieve sustainable development and prevent excessive use of natural resources. This requires a new philosophy on the role of law in ecohydrological protection since environmental legislations fail to punish human activities that had either directly or indirectly disrupt the normal hydrological cycle. An analysis on earth jurisprudence, environmental ethics, equity and justice may elucidate the need to preserve a heathy ecohydrology as its own and other human’s right.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Linton J (2008), Is the Hydrologic Cycle Sustainable? A Historical–Geographical Critique of a Modern Concept. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98(3), 630-649.

      [2] Leopold A (1949), A Sand County Almanac: With Other Essays on Conservation from ‘Round River’. New York: Oxford University Press.

      [3] Zakaria S (2010), Impact of Climate Change on Water: Focus Malaysia. Association of space Explorers (ASE) XXIII Planetary Congress. Putrajaya Malaysia.

      [4] Global Water System Project (2012).

      [5] Dunn, Helen (2011), Payments for Ecosystem Services, DEFRA Forest Stewardship Council.

      [6] Mauerhofer V, Hubacek K & Coleby A (2013), From Polluter Pays to Provider Gets: Distribution of Rights and Costs under Payments for Ecosystem Services. Ecology and Society 18(4), 41.

      [7] Wunder S (2007), The Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services in Tropical Conservation. Conservation Biology 21(1), 48–58.

      [8] Farber S, Costanza R, Childers DL, Erickson J, Gross K, Grove M, Hopkinson CS, Kahn J, Pincetl S, Troy A, Warren P & Wilson M (2006), Linking Ecology and Economics for Ecosystem Management. BioScience 56(2), 117-129.

      [9] Costanza R (2006), Nature: Ecosystems without Commodifying Them. Nature 443(7113) 749.

      [10] Moller A & Ranke U (2006), Estimation of the On-farm-costs of Soil Erosion in Sleman, Indonesia. In: Martin-Duque JF, Brebbia CA, Emmanouloudis DE, Mander U & (Eds.), Geo-Environment and Landscape Evolution Ii - Evolution, Monitoring, Simulation, Management and Remediation of the Geological Environment and Landscape 43–52.

      [11] Gunatilake HM & Vieth GR (2000), Estimation of on-site cost of soil erosion: A comparison replacement and productivity change methods. J of Soil &Water Conservation 55, 197–204.

      [12] Barbier EB (2007), Valuing ecosystems as productive inputs. Economic Policy 179–229.

      [13] Gilvear DJ, Spray CJ & Casas-Mulet R (2013), River Rehabilitation for the Delivery of Multiple Ecosystem Services at the River Network Scale. Journal of Environmental Management 126, 30-43.

      [14] Arthington AH, Naiman RJ, Mcclain ME & Nilsson C (2010), Preserving the Biodiversity and Ecological Services of Rivers: New Challenges and Research Opportunities. Freshwater Biology 55, 1–16.

      [15] The Malay Mail (2016) Bar logging at all water catchments, Putrajaya told, http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/bar-logging-at-all-water-catchments-putrajaya-told#sthash.QgD0ObIL.dpuf

      [16] Alexander S (2010), Earth Jurisprudence and the Ecological Case for De-growth. The Journal Jurisprudence 131-148.

      [17] Koons JE (2012), At the Tipping Point: Defining an Earth Jurisprudence for Social and Ecological Justice. Layola Law Review 58, 349-390.

      [18] Schillmoller A & Pelizzon A (2013), Mapping the Terrain of Earth Jurisprudence: Landscape, Thresholds and Horizons Environmental and Earth Law Journal 3, 1-32.

      [19] Berry T (1999), The Great Work: Our Way into the Future. New York: Bell Tower Press.

      [20] Aquinas T (1952), Summa Theologica. Translated by Father of the English Dominican Province. Revised by Daniel J. Sullivan. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.

      [21] Bosselmann K (2008), The Principle of Sustainability: Transforming Law and Governance. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.

      [22] Stenmark M (2002), Environmental Ethics and Policy Making. Ashgate, Burlington.

      [23] Schweitzer A (1949), Out of My Life and Thought: An Autobiography, Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York 158-159, as quoted in Stenmark, Environmental Ethics and Policy Making.

      [24] Taylor P (1986), Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics, Princeton University Press, Princeton 172-187, as quoted in Stenmark, Environmental Ethics and Policy Making.

      [25] Passmore J (1974), Man’s Responsibility for Nature. Ecological Problems and Western Traditions, Gerard Duckworth and Co. Ltd. London.

      [26] Brown-Weiss E (1992), Intergenerational Equity: A Legal Framework for Global Environmental Change. Environmental Change and International Law: New Challenges and Dimensions. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

      [27] OECD (1974), Recommendation on the Implementation of the Polluter Pay Principle.

      [28] Sadeleer ND (2007), Origin, Status and Effects of the Precautionary Principle. Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Approaches from the Nordic Countries, EU and USA. London: Earthscan.

      [29] German L, Villamor G, Twine E, Velarde SJ & Kidane B (2009), Environmental Services and the Precautionary Principle: Using Scenarios to Reconcile Conservation and Livelihood Objectives in Upper Catchments. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 28 (3-5), 368-394.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Md Khalid, R., Jaria Maidin, A., & Sarah Sulaiman, S. (2018). Preserving a Healthy Ecohydrology: a Legal Perspective. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.30), 169-173. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18221

    Received date: 2018-08-25

    Accepted date: 2018-08-25

    Published date: 2018-08-24