Rescuing Asylum-Seeker Stranded at Sea: Malaysia’s Duty under International Law

  • Authors

    • Syafiq Sulaiman
    • Salawati Mat Basir
    • Mohd Zamre Mohd Zahir
    2018-08-24
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18224
  • Asylum-Seeker, Duty to Rescue, International Law, Malaysia, Right to Life.

  • Abstract

    The protection of the right to life and the duty to rescue persons in distress at sea are the fundamental obligations under two specialized international law regimes which are the international human rights law and the law of the sea. These rules when read together form a strong protection of the human rights of the asylum-seekers stranded at sea. However, often states failed to honour this obligation for various reasons ranging from national security to economic reasons. This article will analyse Malaysia’s responsibilities as regards the right to life and the duty to rescue of these asylum-seekers. It will also identify the existing international and domestic legal framework relevant to the application of these obligations upon Malaysia and whether it has acted in breach of such obligations. The article then proceeded with suggestions for further improvement that Malaysia can adopt in order to better perform its obligations. This study is a pure doctrinal legal research which is qualitative in nature. The data used in this research is collected from library-based resources. These data were then analyzed by using methods of content analysis as well as critical analysis. The article found that Malaysia has a duty to protect the right to life under international human rights law. Additionally, Malaysia is also bound under the law of the sea to perform its duty to rescue. In view of Malaysia’s failure to perform these duties in two occasions in the past consequently had resulted in a violation of international law. Therefore, it is suggested that Malaysia should initiate a revision of its national laws and policies regarding treatment of asylum-seekers stranded at sea to be in line with Malaysia’s duty under international law. Besides, the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency is call upon to comply with the international standards of treatment of persons in distress at sea which includes the asylum-seekers.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] UNHCR (2018), Asylum-Seekers. Retrieved February 2018, 2018, from UNHCR: http://www.unhcr.org/en-my/asylum-seekers.html

      [2] Phillips J (2011 January 14), Asylum seekers and refugees: what are the facts? BACKGROUND NOTE - Department of Parliamentary Services. Canberra, Australia.

      [3] Kassim, A. (2009). Filipino Refugees in Sabah: State Responses, Public Stereotypes and the Dilemma Over Their Future. Southeast Asian Studies 52-88.

      [4] Erlanger S (1990 April 17), MALAYSIA ACCUSED ON BOAT PEOPLE. Retrieved February 20, 2018, from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/1990/04/17/world/malaysia-accused-on-boat-people.html

      [5] Klein N (2014), Assessing Australia’s Push Back The Boats Policy Under International Law: Legality And Accountability For Maritime Interceptions Of Irregular Migrants. Melbourne Journal of International Law (15), 414.

      [6] UNHCR. (2015 May 2015), Joint Statement by UNHCR, OHCHR, IOM and SRSG for Migration and Development: Search and rescue at sea, disembarkation, and protection of the human rights of refugees and migrants now imperative to save lives in the Bay of Bengal and Andaman Sea. Retrieved February 20, 2018, from UNHCR: http://www.unhcr.org/555aee739.html

      [7] Human Rights Watch (2015 May 14), Southeast Asia: End Rohingya Boat Pushbacks - Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia Should Act Urgently to Save Lives. Retrieved February 20, 2018, from Human Rights Watch: https://www.hrw.org/news/2015/05/14/southeast-asia-end-rohingya-boat-pushbacks.

      [8] UNHCR (2018), UNHCR thanks Indonesia and Malaysia for rescue and disembarkation of Rohingya refugees, calls on countries in the region to comply with maritime search and rescue obligations. Retrieved from United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR): http://www.unhcr.org/en-my/news/press/2018/5/5ae81d624/unhcr-thanks-indonesia-malaysia-rescue-disembarkation-rohingya-refugees.html .

      [9] Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (2015), Laporan Tahunan Maritim Malaysia - Laporan Tahunan 2015 (Annual Report 2015). Retrieved from Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA): https://www.mmea.gov.my/artikel/Laporan_Tahunan/APMM_LaporanTahunan_2015.pdf

      [10] Worster WT (2014), The Contemporary International Law Status of the Right to Receive Asylum. International Journal of Refugee Law 26(4), 477–499.

      [11] Edwards A (2005 January 1), Human Rights, Refugees, and The Right ‘To Enjoy’ Asylum. International Journal of Refugee Law 17(2), 293–330.

      [12] Basir SM (2011), Right to Development as a Human Right: A Challenge to Malaysia. In K. A. Mokhtar, Constitutional Law and Human Rights in Malaysia: Selected Issues 333. Kuala Lumpur: IIUM Press.

      [13] Nordin R (2010), Malaysian Perspective on Human Rights . Malaysian Journal of Law and Society (JUUM) 17-33.

      [14] Papanicolopulu I (2016) The duty to rescue at sea, in peacetime and in war: A general overview. International Review of the Red Cross 491–514.

      [15] Severance AA (2006), The Duty to Render Assistance in the Satellite Age. California Western International Law Journal, 377-400.

      [16] Moen AE (2010), For Those in Peril on the Sea: Search and Rescue under the Law of the Sea Convention. Ocean Yearbook Online 377.

      [17] International Maritime Organization (2004 May 20), GUIDELINES ON THE TREATMENT OF PERSONS RESCUED AT SEA. Retrieved from IMO.ORG: http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Facilitation/personsrescued/Documents/MSC.167(78).pdf.

      [18] Allain J (2001), The jus cogens Nature of nonâ€refoulement. International Journal of Refugee Law 533–558.

      [19] Gombeer K (2017), Human Rights Adrift? Enabling the Disembarkation of Migrants to a Place of Safety in the Mediterranean. Irish Yearbook of International Law 9.

      [20] Ratcovich M (2015), The Concept of ‘Place of Safety’: Yet Another Self-Contained Maritime Rule or a Sustainable Solution to the Ever-Controversial Question of Where to Disembark Migrants Rescued at Sea? Australian Year Book of International Law 1-52.

      [21] O’Brien KS (2011), Refugees on the High Seas: International Refugee Law Solutions to a Law of the Sea Problem. Goettingen Journal of International Law 715-732.

      [22] Coppens J & Somers E (2010), Towards New Rules on Disembarkation of Persons Rescued at Sea? The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 377 – 403.

      [23] Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA) (2018 April 3), MEDIA RELEASE: BOAT CARRYING ROHINGYA WHO FLED FROM MYANMAR LANDED IN LANGKAWI. Retrieved from Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA): https://www.mmea.gov.my/artikel/Siaran_Media/2018/PR_ROHINGYA_3.4.18 .

      [24] Murdoch L (2015 May 13), 'Some are already dead': Rohingya Muslims stranded at sea by Indonesia and Malaysia. Retrieved from The Sydney Morning Herald: https://www.smh.com.au/world/some-are-already-dead-rohingya-muslims-stranded-at-sea-by-indonesia-and-malaysia-20150513-gh0f8j.html .

      [25] Basir SM (2014), Sustainable Development In Malaysia: The Way Forward And Challenges In The Modern Era. Brawijaya Law Journal 4.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Sulaiman, S., Mat Basir, S., & Zamre Mohd Zahir, M. (2018). Rescuing Asylum-Seeker Stranded at Sea: Malaysia’s Duty under International Law. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.30), 182-187. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18224

    Received date: 2018-08-25

    Accepted date: 2018-08-25

    Published date: 2018-08-24