The Problem of ‘Open Price Term’ in Contracts of Sale of Goods in Iran and under the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods

  • Authors

    • Farzaneh Akrami
    • Sakina Shaik Ahmad Yu
    • Suzanna Mohamed Isa
    2018-08-24
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18232
  • Open price, contract of sale of goods, Iranian Civil Code, United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods

  • This is an undeniable fact is that incomprehensible or restricted rules cause problems for merchants as suppliers. This is more perceptible through domestic rules of the countries. However, international businessmen are also affected by existing conflicts in the international regulations. The concept of ‘open price term’ in contracts for the sale of goods is one of the best samples for developments in the world’s trade. However, regarding the open price term, the Iranian law has yet to adopt this vital phenomenon. On the other hand, if Iranian legislator aims to impose open price rules in the regulations, provisions of an international set of rules seem to be a useful model for such regulations as they are more common and have the capacity of being applied in the contracts made by parties from all over the world. As such, the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), as an international set of rules containing open price rules is chosen in this paper to be studied as a model for such regulations. However, respective Article in CISG consists of some shortcoming as well. Thus, Adopting the doctrinal research method, in this paper aims to highlight the importance of adopting new rules for new methods of transaction and the necessity of amendments on existing rules.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Zuluet FD (1945), The Roman Law of Sale. Oxford: Clarendon.

      [2] Darabpoor M (1995), An Interpretation on International Sale Law. Tehran: Ganjedanesh.

      [3] Prosser WL (1932), Open price in contracts for the sale of goods. Minnesota Law Review 16(7), 733-790.

      [4] Darabpoor M (1998), Open price. Tahghighat Hoghooghi 21-22, 221-283.

      [5] Bahrami HA (2005), History of Civil Code legislation. Imam Sadeq University Research Quarterly 24, 33-55.

      [6] Katoozian N (2012), Introduction to Law. 81. Tehran: Enteshar.

      [7] Katoozian N (1996), General Rules of Contracts. Tehran: Enteshar & Bahmanborna.

      [8] Katoozian N (2006), Course of Defined Contracts; Civil Law. Tehran: Enteshar.

      [9] Katoozian N (1997), Course of Civil Law Lessons from Defined Contracts. Tehran: Ganjedanesh.

      [10] Deilami A (2004), Requirements for Interpretation of Rules. Qom: Qom University Publication.

      [11] Baroonians A (1953), Methods of interpretation of civil rules. Bar Association Journal 35, 31-38.

      [12] Emami S H (1996), Civil Law. Tehran: Eslamiyeh.

      [13] Shahidi M (1993), Formation of the Contracts and Obligations. Tehran: Hoghooghdan Publication.

      [14] Akrami F, Sakina Shaik Ahmad Yusoff & Suzanna Mohamed Isa (2015). Open price for Iran: The bases for reform. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 6, 166-174.

      [15] Poursaber B (2010), Open price. Azad University Law Quarterly 11, 11-22.

      [16] Noori SM (2000), Sale contract with open price according to the Islam rules. Nameh Mofid 22, 33-70.

      [17] Ferrari F (1998), Implementations of the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) [Notes]. International Business Law Journal 1998(7), 835-839.

      [18] Anon (2012) United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Digest of Case Law on the United Nation Convention on the International Sale of Goods. United Nations Publication: New York. Available at: http://www.uncitral.org/pdf/english/clout/08-51939_Ebook.pdf (visited 19 Oct 2013).

      [19] Amato P (1993), U.N. Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods - the Open price Term and Uniform Application: An Early Interpretation by the Hungarian Courts. Journal of Law and Commerce 13, 1-29.

      [20] Mistelis L (2005-2006), Article 55 CISG: the unknown factor. Journal of Law and Commerce 25(1), 285-298.

      [21] Farnsworth AE, (1984), The Vienna Conventions history and scope. International Law Journal, 18, 17-20.

      [22] Honnold JO (1986), Uniform law for international trade-progress and prospects. International Lawyer, 20, 635-639.

      [23] Honnold JO (1984), New uniform law for international law for international sales and the UCC: A Comparison. International Lawyer (ABA), 18(1), 21-28.

      [24] Bernstein H & Lookofsky JM (2002), Understanding the CISG in Europe. Kluwer Law International: England.

      [25] Lookofsky JM, Bridge M, Viscasillas, MDPP, Erauw J, Gabriel, H, Garro A, Volken P, Brand RA, Ly FD, Arcevic PA, Murray JE, Magnus U, Ferrari F & Flechtner H (2003), The Draft Uncitral Digest and Beyond: Cases, Analysis and Unresolved Issues in the U.N Sales Convention. London: European Law Publisher.

      [26] Edwards FR & Cindy WM (1992), Futures & Options. Singapore: Mc.Graw Hill.

      [27] Benjamin JP, Bridge MG, Bennett H, Dawson F, Lomnicka E, Miller CJ, Rawlings P, Reynolds FMB & Treitel G. (eds). (2010), Benjamin’s Sale of Goods. London: Sweet & Maxwell.

      [28] Morvarid AA (1993), Selselah Al-Yanabiô Al-Feqhiah. Beirut: Feqh Al-Shi’ah.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Akrami, F., Shaik Ahmad Yu, S., & Mohamed Isa, S. (2018). The Problem of ‘Open Price Term’ in Contracts of Sale of Goods in Iran and under the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.30), 219-224. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18232