The Impact of the Distance between School and Downtown on the Result of the National Exam on Geography 2017

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    There are some factors that will determine the result of National Exam score. One of them is the distance between school and downtown. The schools that are located in the downtown should have higher score compared to the schools located far away from downtown. It is because of the circulation of information around the downtown schools is more rapid than those schools located in far away from downtown. There are some previous research on correlation between students’ accessibility to their schools with students achievement, however there no research on correlation between school distance from downtown and students achievement. This research aims to analyze the correlation between school distance to downtown and students’ National Exam achievement on geography subject in 2017. This research is a qualitative descriptive research. This research uses documentation and literature study. The result data of this research shows the school in downtown achieved highest National Exam score on geography, however, there is no positive correlation between the mileage to schools and students’ achievement. Furthermore, the distance beteween school and downtown does not show a positive correlation. Therefore it could be concluded that there is no correlation between distance and mileage from school to downtown with the National Exam result on geography subject in 2017 at SMA Negeri Kabupaten Bangka (Public Senior High School in Bangka Regency).

     

     


  • Keywords


    Distance, Geography, Learning Result, Mileage.

  • References


      [1] Gerber & Rod (2014), Geographical Education. Volume 1. http://www.eolss.net/Eolss-sampleAllChapter.aspx

      [2] Daldjoeni (2014), Pengantar Geografi. Yogyakarta: Ombak

      [3] Mansfield & Dicson, The importance of Geography in The School Curriculum. Faculty of Education, Queen’s University Kingston: Ontario.

      [4] Rasto dkk (2011), Analisis Peta Kompetensi Hasil Ujian Nasional dan Model Pengembangan Mutu Pendidikan SMA di Jawa Barat (Survey di Kabupaten Garut dan Kabupaten Tasikmalaya). Artikel Hasil Penelitian.

      [5] Setiawan & Iwan (2016), Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Geografi Melalui Pengembangan Media Pendidikan. http://download.portalgaruda.org. Ipi436556.

      [6] Taufik dkk (2016), Understanding of High School Student Achievement in Geography Lesson at Malang – East Java – Indonesia. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME) e-ISSN: 2320–7388.p-ISSN: 2320–737X 6(3) 48-54 www.iosrjournals.org.

      [7] Lestari, Sri & Kusumo, Hendro (2015), Perbandingan Variasi Jarak Tempuh ke Sekolah terhadap Prestasi Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas VII SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Kalibawang. Jurnal Bioedukatika. Volume 3. Nomor 1 ISSN: 2338-6630. Page 33-36

      [8] Nomleni, dkk (2015), Pengaruh Lingkungan Geografis terhadap Prestasi Belajar Peserta Didik Kelas XI IPS Mata pelajaran Geografi. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran 22(1).

      [9] Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 96/pmk.06/2007 tentang tata Cara pelaksanaan penggunaan, Pemanfaatan, penghapusan, dan Pemindahtanganan barang milik Negara.

      [10] Nurbaiti (2015), Manajemen Sarana dan Prasarana Sekolah. Jurnal Manajer Pendidikan 9(4), 536-546.

      [11] Sudjana & Nana. (2014), Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.

      [12] Slameto (2015), Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.


 

View

Download

Article ID: 18261
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18261




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.