An Evidence-based Model of Teacher Engagement in Indonesia: Indonesian Teacher Engagement Index (ITEI)

  • Authors

    • Sasmoko .
    • Yasinta Indrianti
    • Aqeel Khan
    • Nor Fadila Amin
    2018-08-24
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18265
  • Indonesian Teacher Engagement Index, Neuroresearch.
  • Educational transformation can occur when teachers are directly involved in seeking change through self-diagnostic measurements to have a clear picture of Indonesian teachers’ capacity as a teacher, professional and Indonesian character educator.  The instrument discussed in this research is the Indonesian Teacher Engagement Index (ITEI). This research is the result of the literature review to produce the ITEI model. The research used Neuroresearch method with an exploratory stage through journal study and focus group discussion. The result of the research found that there is a teacher engagement model that is suitable for the characteristics of teachers in Indonesia.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Darling-Hammond L (2010), Teacher Education and the American Future. Journal of Teacher Education 61(1–2), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109348024

      [2] Heck RH, & Hallinger P (2005), The Study of Educational Leadership and Management: Where Does the Field Stand Today? Educational Management Administration & Leadership 33(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143205051055

      [3] Azam M & Kingdon G (2014), Assessing Teacher Quality.

      [4] Darling-Hammond L (2006), Constructing 21st-Century Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education 57(3), 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962

      [5] Suparlan D & Ed M (2005), Menjadi Guru Efektif. Yogyakarta: Hikayat, Cet. I.

      [6] Sujanto B (2009), Cara Efektif Menuju Sertifikasi Guru. Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukse.

      [7] Dvir T, Eden D, Avolio BJ, & Shamir B (2002), Impact of transformational leadership on follower development and performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal 45(4), 735–744. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069307

      [8] Harter JK, Schmidt FL, & Hayes TL (2002), Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(2), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.2.268

      [9] Kahn WA (1990), Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. The Academy of Management Journal 33(4), 692. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287

      [10] Schaufeli WB (2012), Work engagement: what do we know and where do we go? Romanian Journal of Applied Psychology 14(1), 3.10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000002301006

      [11] Hakanen JJ, & Schaufeli WB (2012), Do burnout and work engagement predict depressive symptoms and life satisfaction? A three-wave seven-year prospective study. Journal of Affective Disorders 141(2–3), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.02.043

      [12] Hu Q, Schaufeli W, Taris T, Hessen D, Hakanen JJ, Salanova M, & Shimazu A (2014), East is east and west is west and never the twain shall meet: Work engagement and workaholism across Eastern and Western cultures. Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences 1(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.346.6216.1569-d

      [13] Shimazu A, Schaufeli WB, Kamiyama K & Kawakami N (2014), Workaholism vs. Work Engagement: the Two Different Predictors of Future Well-being and Performance. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9410-x

      [14] Vecina ML, Chacón F, Sueiro M & Barrón A (2012), Volunteer Engagement: Does Engagement Predict the Degree of Satisfaction among New Volunteers and the Commitment of Those who have been Active Longer? Applied Psychology 61(1), 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00460.x

      [15] Beairsto B (2012), Teacher Engagement.

      [16] Klassen R, Yerdelen S, & Durksen T (2013), Measuring Teacher Engagement: Development of the Engaged Teachers Scale ( ETS ). Frontline Learning Research 2, 33–52. Retrieved from http://journals.sfu.ca/flr/flr/index.php/journal/article/view/44

      [17] Rutter RA & Jacobson JD (1986), Facilitating Teacher Engagement. Educational Research, (3).

      [18] Carnegie Forum on Education Profession (May 1986), A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century: the Report of the Task Force on Teaching as a Profession, Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.

      [19] McLaughlin MW, & Pfeifer RS (1986), Teacher evaluation: Learning for improvement and accountability. ERIC.

      [20] Rosenholtz SJ, Bassler O, & Hoover-Dempsey K (1986), Organizational conditions of teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(86)90008-9

      [21] Skinner E, Furrer C, Marchand G & Kindermann T (2008), Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology 100(4), 765–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012840

      [22] Cardwell ME (2011), Patterns of Relationships Between Teacher Engagement and Student Engagement. Fisher Digital Publication.

      [23] Fios F, Sasmoko, & Gea AA (2016), Neuro-Research Method: A Synthesis Between Hermeneutics and Positivism. Advanced Science Letters 22(9), 2202–2206. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.7565

      [24] Sasmoko, Ying Y (2015), Construct Validity in NeuroResearch. Advanced Science Letters, 21(7), 2438–2441. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2015.6301

      [25] Sasmoko & Anggriyani D (2016), Neuroresearch (A Model of Research Method). In A. Khan MNA, Ghafar AR, Hamdan & R Talib (Eds.), Research on Educational Studies (2016th ed., 33–45). New Delhi: Serial Publications PVT. LTD.

      [26] Basikin (27-28 November 2007), Vigor, dedication and absorption: Work engagement among secondary school English teachers in Indonesia. AARE International Conference, Perth, Australia, 25–29.

      [27] Alex Linley P, Joseph S, Harrington S, & Wood AM (2006), Positive psychology: Past, present, and (possible) future. The Journal of Positive Psychology 1(1) 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760500372796.

      [28] Gable SL, & Haidt J (2005), What (and Why) Is Positive Psychology? Review of General Psychology 9(2), 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.2.103 [29]

      [29] King LA (2017), Why Positive Psychology Is Necessary, (April 2001), 216–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.216 [30]

      [30] Seligman MEP, Steen TA, Park N & Peterson C (2005), Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. The American Psychologist 60(5), 410–21. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410

      [31] Norrish J (2013), An applied framework for Positive Education. International Journal of Wellbeing 3(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v3i2.2

      [32] Campbell CH, Ford P, Rumsey MG, & Pulakos ED (1990), Development of Multiple Job Perfromance Measures in a Representative Sample of Jobs. Personnel Psychology 43, 200–277.

      [33] Rotundo M. & Sackett PR (2002), The Relative Importance of Task, Citizenship and Counterproductive Performance to Global Ratings of Job Performance: A Policy-Capturing Approach. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(1), 66–80

      [34] Guarino CM, Reckase MD, & Wooldridge JM (2015), Can Value-Added Measures of Teacher Performance Be Trusted? Education Finance and Policy 10(1), 117–156. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00153

      [35] Owens BP, Baker WE, Sumpter DM & Cameron KS. (2015). Relational energy at work: implications for job engagement and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000032

      [36] Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, Gonzalez-Roma V & Bakker AB (2002), the Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: a Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71–92.

      [37] Yusoff R, Bin Ali A & Khan A (2014), Assessing reliability and validity of job performance scale among university teachers. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research 4(1), 35–41.

      [38] Law of the Republic of Indonesia (2005). Teachers and Lecturers, No 14, 2005.

      [39] Sudaryanti D, Sukoharsono EG, Baridwan Z & Mulawarman AD (2015), Critical Analysis on Accounting Information Based On Pancasila Value. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 172, 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.399.

      [40] Kusumawardani,A. (2004). Faturochman.(2004). Nasionalisme. Buletin Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada, 12(2), 61-72.

      [41] Alshemmeri, F., Putih, A., Siraj, S., Khan, A., Abdallah, N. (2011). Art Ability and Academic Achievement in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Role of Age and Sex. New Educational Review, 26 (4), 238-247.

      [42] Khan, A. (2012). Sex Differences’ in Educational Encouragement and Academic Achievement. Psychological Reports 111 (1), 149-155.

      [43] Bernardo, A. B. I., Salanga, M. G. C., Tjipto, S., Hutapea, B., Yeung, S. S., & Khan, A. (2016). Cross Cultural Research, 50 (3), 231–250.

      [44] Janssens, H., Verkuyten, M. & Khan, A. (2015). Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 18(1), 52-61

      [45] Khan, A. (2013). Predictors of Positive Psychological Strengths and Subjective Well-being among North Indian Adolescents: Role of Mentoring and Educational Encouragement. Social Indicators Research, 114, 3, 1285-1293

      [46] Mohd Tahir, L., Khan, A., Musah, M.B., Ahmad, R., Daud, K., Al-Hudawi, S.H.V., Musta’Amal @ Jamal, A.H., & Talib, R. (2018). Community Mental Health Journal. doi.org/10.1007/s10597-017-0206-8

      [47] Khan, A & Husain, A. (2010). Social Support as a Moderator of Positive Psychological Strengths and Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Reports, 106, 534-538.

      [48] Khan, A., Shin, L.P., Hishan, S.S., Mustaffa, M.S., Madihie, A., & Sabil, S. (2018). Effect of personality traits and learning styles towards students’ academic achievement in Johor Bahru. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7 (2.10), 4-9.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    ., S., Indrianti, Y., Khan, A., & Fadila Amin, N. (2018). An Evidence-based Model of Teacher Engagement in Indonesia: Indonesian Teacher Engagement Index (ITEI). International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.30), 297-300. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18265