Child Delinquency on the Internet

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Recent reported cases and news on children and the Internet reflect the vulnerability of children when they are online, especially with in using the new medium of social networking websites such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter. The criminal justice system faces the dilemma when children break the law, as children are considered as minors who are not legally responsible for their actions. In most cases, the society tend to focus on protecting children from neglect, abuse or harms but often overlooked of protecting children who are involved in harming or causing injury to other people or cause damage to property. It is equally important to address the growing concern on children’s exposure to usage of the Internet. Thus, the question such as, can the child’s wrongs on the Internet be considered as a delinquent act, namely possible wrongful acts conducted by children that would otherwise be an offence if committed by an adult, is explored. The legal status and minimum age of criminal responsibility in Malaysia are also examined. In addition, the Shariah views will be discussed briefly. Then, the paper explores the problems and challenges face by children in using social media websites. Finally, the paper suggests that the government and the community in particular parents and teachers have vital roles to play in ensuring that the policies and rules provide mechanism not only to protect children but also to empower them as a citizen of the country. This may be done by advocating legal awareness and educating the children to be more responsible in their acts online and uphold respect in law, ethics and morality.

     

     

     


  • Keywords


    Child delinquency; age of criminal responsibility; Internet's wrong; online crime; social media.

  • References


      [1] Harmut von Henting, as quoted by Crofts, T. ‘Doli Incapax: Why Children Deserve Its Protection’. Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, available at http://www.murdoch.edu.au/elaw/issues/v10n3/crofts103nf.html.

      [2] Sjöberg, U. (1999). The rise of the electronic individual: A study of how young Swedish teenagers use and perceive Internet. Telematics and Informatics, 16(3), 113-133.

      [3] Bainham, A. (1998). Changing families and changing concepts-reforming the language of family law. Child & Fam. LQ, 10, 1.

      [4] Bandalli, S. (1998) ‘Abolition of the Presumption of Doli Incapax and the Criminalisation of Children’, The Howard Journal, Vol 37, No, 2, May 1998.

      [5] Sherry Turkle, (1995), ‘Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet’, Touchstone Edition, New York.

      [6] Turkle, S. (2001). Foreword: All MOOs are Educational—the Experience of" Walking through the Self. High wired: On the design, use, and theory of education MOOs.

      [7] English Oxford living Dictionary, 2017 see https://en.oxforddictionaries.com.

      [8] Nasimah Hussin, (2007), Juvenile Delinquency in Malaysia: Legal Framework and Prospects for Reforms, IIUM Law Journal, 15(2).

      [9] United States Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) see: https://www.ojjdp.gov

      [10] Child Act 2001 (Amendment 2016).

      [11] Snyder, H. N., Espiritu, R. C., Huizinga, D., Loeber, R., & Petechuk, D. (2003). Prevalence and development of child delinquency. Child delinquency bulletin series, March 2003.

      [12] Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., & Petechuk, D. (2003). Child delinquency: Early intervention and prevention. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

      [13] Flowers, R. B. (1986). ‘Children and criminality: The child as victim and perpetrator’ (Vol. 13). Greenwood Publishing Group.

      [14] Azlina@Roszy AG, ‘Gajet@Gen α,’ paper presented at Simposium Penyelidikan dan Meja Bulat, Putrajaya, May, 17, 2017.

      [15] Age of Majority Act 1971

      [16] Contracts Act 1950

      [17] Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976

      [18] Majid, M.K. (2001)’ Akta Kanak-kanak 2001, Cadangan Pindaan Undang-undang Berkenaan Gejala Sosial’ in Siti Zaharah, et, al. (Ed) Siri Undang-undang Mimi Kamariah, Akta Kanak-kanak 2001, Universiti Malaya: Kuala Lumpur, 2002.

      [19] Fionda, J. (1999). Crime and Disorder Act 1998: New labour, old hat: Youth justice and the Crime and Disorder Act 1998. Criminal Law Review, (Jan), 36-47.

      [20] Syariah Criminal Offences (Federal Territories) Act 1997

      [21] Abdul Karim Zaidan (2006) Al Wajiz fi Usul Fiqh. Resalah Publisher: Lebanon.

      [22] Wahbah Az-Zuhaili, (2011), ‘Bab Al-Ahkam As-Syar'iyyah’, Usul Fiqh Al-Islami, Dar Al-Fikr; Beirut.

      [23] Al Bayhaqi, ‘Kitabul Hudud,’ Hadith no 4402, vol.IV, Ma’rifatussunan.

      [24] Ibn Abidin, Muhammad Amin ibn Umar, (2000) Hashiyah Radd al-Mukhtar ala al-Durr al-Mukhtar. V.6. DarrMa’rifah: Beirut.

      [25] Ibn Qudamah (1997), Al-Mughni, Dar Alam Al-Kutub; Riyadh

      [26] As-Syafie, Muhammad bin Idris. (2001), Al-Umm, Dar-Al Wafaa’; Egypt

      [27] An-Nasafi, Abu- Al-Barakat (2011), Kanz Ad-Daqaaiq, Dar Al-Bashair Al-Islami; Beirut

      [28] Anita Abdul Rahim (2009) ‘Isu Perundangan Mengenai Hukuman Jenayah Bunuh oleh Kanak-Kanak di Malaysia’, Jurnal Undang-Undang dan Masyarakat. (1998)

      [29] Al Mawardi (1989) Ahkamul Sultaniyyah, Dar Ibn Qutaibah, Kuwait.

      [30] Nisrine Abiad and Farkhanda Zia Mansoor (2010) ‘Criminal Law & the Rights of the Child in Muslim States’. British Institute of International Comparative Law: London.

      [31] Utusan Borneo (Sabah). 23 Nov 2016, "Awasi Anak Untuk Elak Jadi Mangsa Pelaku Jenayah Seks'; Sinar 10 October 2016.”Kanak-kanak Jadi Hamba Seks Kenalan WeChat"

      [32] Stalans, L. J., & Finn, M. A. (2016). Understanding How the Internet Facilitates Crime and Deviance. 11.

      [33] Hsieh, M.L, Mc Shanes, MD and Williams, MF (2016) ‘Juveniles in Cyberspace Issues in Enforcement and Parental Control in Understanding Juvenile Justice and Delinquency’, McShane, and Cavanaugh, M (eds) USA: Praeger.

      [34] Lu, Tian, et, al (2016) ‘Psycological factors lead to Delinquency Intention on Online Peer-to-Peer Landing Platform, A Survey Evidence’, PACIS 2016 Proceedings.191. Available at http://aisel.aisnet.org/pacis2016/191 Lu Tian,

      [35] J. Bishop, (2014) ‘Digital teens and the ‘Antisocial Network’: Prevalance of troublesome Online Youth Groups and Internet trolling in Great Britain’ 5(3) International Journal of E-Politics

      [36] Navarro, J. N., Marcum, C. D., Higgins, G. E., & Ricketts, M. L. (2016). Addicted to the Thrill of the Virtual Hunt: Examining the Effects of Internet Addiction on the Cyberstalking Behaviors of Juveniles. Deviant Behavior, 37(8), 893-903.

      [37] Utusan Online, 20 October 2011, "Mangsa Dibuli Di Laman Sosial", http://ww1.utusan.com.my/utusan/info.aspy=2011&dt=1020&pub=Utusan_Malaysia&sec=Sains_%26_Teknologi&pg=st_01.htm; Harian Metro. 2 July 2016. "WeChat Pilihan Pedofilia Cari Mangsa"

      [38] Sanford, J.Fox, (1970) ‘Juvenile Justice Reform: A Historical Perspective’, 22 Stanford Law Review,


 

View

Download

Article ID: 18270
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18270




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.