The Pattern of Communication Legal Advisor with Defendant In Indonesian Courtroom

  • Authors

    • Aan Widodo
    • Dadang Rahmat Hidayat
    • Anter Venus
    • Sigid Suseno
    • . .
    2018-08-24
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18343
  • Communication, Lawyer, a defendant, courtroom, advocacy.

  • Abstract

    This article aims to illustrate the pattern of communication between legal Advisor and the defendant in court as one form of communication in the courtroom. This study addresses the research question: how is the communication pattern of legal advisor with the defendant in the courtroom at the Central Jakarta District Court. This research uses qualitative research approach, research method is ethnography of communication, with an interpretive paradigm. The results of this study indicate that communication between the legal advisor with the defendant in the courtroom begins at the time of the indictment hearing, the hearing, the prosecution and the verdict. The form of communication that emerged in the trial process through advocacy. Advocacy is a form of communication of legal Advisor with the defendant, with the primary objective of providing an understanding to the defendant about the legal information and the punishment that the defendant will receive.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Harahap MY. Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP: Sinar Grafika; 2000.

      [2] Nomor U-URI. Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor.49.

      [3] Flower L. Doing loyalty: Defense lawyers’ subtle dramas in the courtroom. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. 2016:0891241616646826.

      [4] Aronsson K, Jönsson L, Linell P. The courtroom hearing as a middle ground: Speech accommodation by lawyers and defendants. Journal of language and Social Psychology. 1987;6(2):99-115.

      [5] Bungin B. Analisis data penelitian kualitatif: PT RajaGrafindo Persada; 2007.

      [6] Mulyana D. Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya. 2001.

      [7] Mulyana D. Ilmu komunikasi: suatu pengantar: Remaja Rosdakarya; 2000.

      [8] Devito JA. Komunikasi antar manusia. Jakarta: Professional Books. 1997.

      [9] Spradley JP, Elizabeth MZ, Amirudin. Metode etnografi1997.

      [10] 10. Spradley JP. The ethnographic interview: Waveland Press; 2016.

      [11] Littlejohn SW, Foss KA. Encyclopedia of communication theory: Sage; 2009.

      [12] Ibrahim AS. Panduan Penelitian Etnografi Komunikasi. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional. 1994.

      [13] Savile-Troike M. The ethnography of communication. Oxford; 1982.

      [14] Effendy OU. Komunikasi Teori & Praktek. Remaja Rosdakarya Bandung. 1989.

      [15] Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative & quantitative approaches: Sage Publications, Inc; 1994.

      [16] Sugiyono MPK. kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2008;124.

      [17] Moleong LJ. Metodologi penelitian. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya. 1999.

      [18] Sugiyono D. Metode Penelitian. Bandung: CV Alvabeta. 2000.

      [19] West R, Turner LH. Pengantar teori komunikasi: analisis dan aplikasi. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika. 2008.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Widodo, A., Rahmat Hidayat, D., Venus, A., Suseno, S., & ., . (2018). The Pattern of Communication Legal Advisor with Defendant In Indonesian Courtroom. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.30), 405-408. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18343

    Received date: 2018-08-27

    Accepted date: 2018-08-27

    Published date: 2018-08-24