An Enhancement of Social Capital of fprm Urban Fabric. a Comparison of Three Cities in Indonesia

  • Authors

    • Ms Barliana
    • Diah Cahyani Permana Sari
    • Dodit Ardian Pancapana
    • Beta Paramita
    2018-08-26
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.32.18387
  • urban form quality, image of the city, social capital, Indonesian cities.

  • The city is a living entity, especially about any urban form; however, the quality of the city would refer to physical qualities. Urban design and spatial planning of the city are good on one hand, and the cultural essence fortified on the other hand. It is important to encourage the strengthening of social capital. Indeed, it is about quality of the city to accommodate quality of life of its citizens. The structure of the physical environment within the city is formed by structural elements (artificial) which cover all elements such as buildings, and various other technical infrastructures connected differently from each other.

    This study was carried in Surabaya and Bandung metropolitan city and Surakarta city in Indonesia. This study aims to give a description of urban form quality of each city; the perception of citizens of their own city, then gives the reciprocal of capital, social value, the sense toward urban form and space, which shown in their daily activity.

    The results show that Bandung and Surakarta have urban form quality in the “low†level, meanwhile Surabaya has the “high†level. Surabaya with “high†level physical quality has correlation with “high†level of their citizen perception. But somehow, in Bandung and Surakarta this physical quality level has different level perception of their citizen as the image of the city. The perception of Bandung City Image by 43 social communities has mentioned that Bandung has “high†level. This perception also shown in 40 social communities in Surakarta, that its city image has “high†level.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Bandung_BMKG. (2012). Bandung Climate Data

      [2] Bappeda-Jatim. (2013). Kota Surabaya 2013. Surabaya: Bappeda.

      [3] Barliana, M. S. (2010). Arsitektur, Komunutas, dan Modal Sosial. Bandung: Metatekstur.

      [4] BPS-Surabaya. (Ed.) (2015).

      [5] BPS. (2010). Sensus Penduduk 2010. from http://sp2010.bps.go.id/

      [6] Cipta-Karya, P. (2013). Sistem Informasi Kawasan Kumuh Perkotaan. Retrieved 05 April 2015, 2015, from http://ciptakarya.pu.go.id/bangkim/kumuh/main.php?module=home

      [7] Daniel Stokols, R. P. L. a. J. H. (2013). Enhancing the resilience of human-environment systems: a social ecological perspective. Ecology and Society, 18(1:7).

      [8] Douglas L. Miller, R. S., Suong Lam, Rhonda Rosenberg, Agnes RUPP (2006). Social Capital and Health in Indonesia. World Development, 34(6), 1084–1098.

      [9] Edward Miguel, P. G., David I. Levine. (2003). Did Industrialization Destroy Social Capital in Indonesia? Berkeley, California: CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL AND DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS RESEARCH.

      [10] Greene, S. (1992). Cityshape: Communicating and Evaluation Community Design. APA Journal, 179-185.

      [11] Howard, W. D. (2002). Surabaya, City of Work: a Socioeconomic History, 1900-2000. Athens: Ohio University Press.

      [12] Indonesia-BPS, B. P. S. (2013). Population Density in Indonesian province. 2013, from http://www.bps.go.id/hasil_publikasi/SI_2013/index3.php?pub=Statistik%20Indonesia%202013

      [13] Irene van Kamp, e. a. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being: Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study. Landscape and Urban Planning, Elsevier Science Ltd., 65, 5-18.

      [14] Jencks, M. a. J., C.A. . (2010). Dimensions of the Sustainable City. . Netherland: Springer.

      [15] Joebagio, H. (2013). POLITIK ISLAM DALAM PUSARAN SEJARAH SURAKARTA. Millah, XII(3).

      [16] Kottler, P. (1993). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control: Pearson US Imports & PHIPEs.

      [17] Leavy, P. (2014). The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

      [18] Lesser, E. (Ed.). (2000). Knowledge and social capital: Foundation and application. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

      [19] Lynch, K. (1982). The Image of the City. Cambridge: MIT Press.

      [20] Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3, 93-116. doi: 10.1080/13574809808724418

      [21] Nassar, J. L. (1998). The evaluate image of the city. New York: Sage Publication.

      [22] Santoso, J. (2006). Menyiasati kota tanpa warga. Jakarta: Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia dan Centropolis.

      [23] Shirvani, H. (1985). The Urban Design Process. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.

      [24] Sumarto, M. (2011). Welfare Regime, Clientelism, and Social Capital: Evidence from Indonesia. Paper presented at the 8th EASP Conference, Hongkong.

      [25] Tara Smith, M. N., Nathan Perkins (1997). Quality of an urban community: a framework for understanding the relationship between quality and physical form. Landscape and Urban Planning, Elsevier Science Ltd., 39, 229-241.

      [26] Tarigan, e. a. (2015). Bandung City, Indonesia. Cities, 50, 100-110.

      [27] Willis, J. W. (2007). Methods of Qualitative Research Foundations of Qualitative Research: Interpretive and Critical Approaches: SAGE.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Barliana, M., Cahyani Permana Sari, D., Ardian Pancapana, D., & Paramita, B. (2018). An Enhancement of Social Capital of fprm Urban Fabric. a Comparison of Three Cities in Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.32), 35-42. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.32.18387