Hydrodynamic studies comparison by simulation with experimental results of reverse fluidized bed

  • Authors

    • H Upender
    • L Pavan Kumar
    • Dr K. Anand Kishore
    2018-08-24
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.29.18454
  • Reverse Fluidization, Simulation, Hydrodynamics.

  • Abstract

    In present days we are much believed computer aided (simulation) results much more than our experimental results even though time consumption, low-cost processes and we can get the efficient results when compare to experimental results. In this task, I compared my experimental results with simulation results (Ansys fluent version 17.2) in the solid liquid reverse fluidized bed system. In this, I did this comparison using Gidaspow drag model and remaining parameters were same the particle diameter was changed. I found that the hydrodynamic behavior by experimentally and by simulation those were bed height profile, pressure drop profile and Voidage profile by changing the velocity profile

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] N. Ulaganathan, K. Krishnaiah, Hydrodynamic characteristics of two-phase inverse fluidized bed, Bioprocesse engineering 15(1996) 159-164 @ springer verbiage 1996.

      [2] Hee-Dong Han, Won Lee, Young-Kang Kim, Jae-Lee Kwon, Ho-Suk Choi†, Yong Kang and Sang-Done Kim*, Phase Hold-up and Critical Fluidization Velocity in a Three-Phase Inverse Fluidized Bed, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20(1), 163-168 (2003).

      [3] C. Vijaya Lakshmi, M. Balamurugan, M. Sivakumar T. Newton Samuel, M. Velan, Minimum fluidization velocity and friction factor in a liquid-solid inverse fluidized bed reactor, Bioprocess Engineering 22 (2000) 461±466 Ó Springer-Verlag 2000.

      [4] Fan L. K. Murayama and S. Chern, Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Inverse fluidization in Liquid-Solid and Gas-Liquid-solid Systems, Chemical Engg Journal, 24, 143-150, 1982.

      [5] Jena H.M. G.K. Roy, B.C. Meikap. Hydrodynamics of regular particles in a liquid– solid semi-fluidized bed, Powder Technology 196, 246-256, 2009.

      [6] McCabe, Smith, and Harriott, book; Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, 6th edition, McGraw-Hill, 2001.

      [7] T. Renganathan and K. Krishnaiah, Stochastic Simulation of Hydrodynamics of a Liquid-Solid Inverse Fluidized Bed, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 4405-4412 4405.

      [8] Thiruvengadam Renganathan and Kamatam Krishnaiah, Prediction of Minimum Fluidization Velocity in Two and Three Phase Inverse Fluidized Beds, The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, Volume 81, and June-August 2003.

      [9] K.E. Campos-Díaz a,*, E.R. Bandala-González b,1, R. Limas-Ballesteros, Fluid bed porosity mathematical model for an inverse fluidized bed bioreactor with particles growing biofilm, Journal of Environmental Management 104 (2012) 62e66.

      [10] Jack T. Cornelissena, Fariborz Taghipoura,∗, Renaud Escudiéa,b, Naoko Ellisa, John R. Gracea, CFD modeling of a liquid–solid fluidized bed , Chemical Engineering Science 62 (2007) 6334 – 6348.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Upender, H., Pavan Kumar, L., & K. Anand Kishore, D. (2018). Hydrodynamic studies comparison by simulation with experimental results of reverse fluidized bed. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.29), 21-25. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.29.18454

    Received date: 2018-08-28

    Accepted date: 2018-08-28

    Published date: 2018-08-24