Criminal Legal Protection of Property in Russia in the Conditions of Development of Property Relations

  • Authors

    • Aleksandr Vasilievich Groshev
    • Aleksandr Georgievich Saprunov
    • Andrey Vladimirovich Shulga
    • Romen Rakhimmulovich Galiakbarov
    • Aleksandr Aleksandrovich Tushev
    2018-08-13
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.15.18681
  • choses, criminal law, economy, property, property rights, proprietorship, the subject of theft.

  • The main purpose of the work is to prove that the subject of thefts and other crimes against proprietorship, which is property, should be interpreted in a broad sense – not only as choses, but also as other property, including property rights. The method of achieving this goal is to justify the fact that in the conditions of building an information society and developing market economy, the field of property turnover is expanding. Economic relations increasingly include both material benefits – choses - and other property that does not have any physical parameters of a traditional chose, being incorporeal, intangible, having the information nature. This tendency is undoubtedly taken into account by the criminal environment, which increasingly often commits crimes aimed at unlawful acquisition of this incorporeal property.

    Therefore, it is required to strengthen the legal protection of nonmaterial property by criminal legal means, recognizing the thefts of both choses and material goods as the subjects of crimes against property. As a result of unlawful acquisition of these goods, property damage is also caused to their owners. The recognition of property rights as the subject of theft determines the novelty of this article.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Poslanie Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii Federalnomu Sobraniyu RF [Address of the President of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation], April 27, 2007.

      [2] Poslanie Prezidenta Rossiiskoi Federatsii Federalnomu Sobraniyu RF [Address of the President of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation], December 3, 2015.

      [3] "Po delu o proverke konstitutsionnosti polozhenii stati 159.4 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s zaprosom Salekhardskogo gorodskogo suda Yamalo-Nenetskogo avtonomnogo okruga". Postanovlenie Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF ot 11.12.2014 N 32-P ["On the Case on the Verification of the Constitutionality of the Provisions of Article 159.4 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in Connection with the Request of the Salekhard City Court of the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous District". Decree of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation No. 32-P]. http://www.pravo.gov.ru. Revised December 11, 2014. Accessed June 29, 2018.

      [4] A.V. Shulga, Obekt i predmet prestuplenii protiv sobstvennosti v usloviyakh rynochnykh otnoshenii i informatsionnogo obshchestva [The Object and Subject of Crimes against Property in the Context of Market Relations and the Information Society], Moscow, 2007, p. 147.

      [5] V.N. Kudryavtsev, O sootnoshenii predmeta i obekta prestupleniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu [On the Relationship between the Subject and the Object of the Crime on Soviet Criminal Law], Trudy Voenno-yuridicheskoi akademii [Proceedings of the Military-Law Academy], Issue 13, 1951, p. 66-67.

      [6] B.S. Nikiforov, Obekt prestupleniya po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu [The Object of Crime of Soviet Criminal Law], Moscow, 1960, p. 122-133.

      [7] G.N. Borzenkova, V.S. Kommissarov (eds.), Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Osobennaya chast. Tom 3. Uchebnik dlya vuzov [The Course of Criminal Law. Special Part. Vol. 3. Textbook for Higher Schools], IKD ZertsaloM, Moscow, 2011, p. 230.

      [8] R. David, Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti [Basic Legal Systems of Our Time], Moscow, 1988, p. 90-92.

      [9] L. Lapach, Ponyatie "imushchestvo" v rossiiskom prave i v Konventsii o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod [The Concept of "Property" in Russian Law and in the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms], Rossiyskaya yustitsiya 1 (2003).

      [10] N.V. Apolinskaya, Opredelenie veshchi kak obekta grazhdanskogo prava Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Definition of a Chose as an Object of Civil Law of the Russian Federation], Sibirskii yuridicheskii vestnik 1(25) (2002).

      [11] N.N. Averchenko, Sootnoshenie termina "veshch" i smezhnykh ponyatii v grazhdanskom prave [Correlation of the Term "Chose" and Related Concepts in Civil Law], Yurist 11 (2003) 2-6.

      [12] N.N. Averchenko, Ponyatie i priznaki veshchi kak obekta grazhdanskikh prav [The Concept and Attributes of a Chose as an Object of Civil Rights], Zhurnal rossiyskogo prava 5 (2004) 86-92.

      [13] V.P. Kamyshanskii, N.M. Korshunova, V.I. Ivanova (eds.), Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik v trekh chastyakh. Chast pervaya [Civil Law: A Textbook in Three Parts. Part One], Eksmo, Moscow, 2010, p. 258.

      [14] K. Marx, F. Engels, Sochineniya [Works], Volume 13, Moscow, 1959, p. 498.

      [15] V.V. Esipov, Ugolovnoe pravo: Chast osobennaya. Prestupleniya protiv lichnosti i imushchestva [Criminal Law: Special Part. Crimes against the Person and Property], St. Petersburg, 1899, p. 139.

      [16] I.Ya. Foinitskii, Kurs ugolovnogo prava: Osobennaya chast. Posyagatelstva lichnye i imushchestvennye [The Course of Criminal Law: Special Part. Personal and Property Encroachments], St. Petersburg, 1912, p. 169-173.

      [17] Ugolovnoe Ulozhenie 22 marta 1903 g. S motivami, izvlechennymi iz obyasnitelnoi zapiski redaktsionnoi komissii, predstavleniya Min. Yustitsii v Gos. Sovet i zhurnalov – osobogo soveshchaniya, osobogo prisutstviya departamentov i obshchego sobraniya Gos. Soveta [Criminal Code of 22 March 1903 (with motives extracted from the Explanatory Comment of the Drafting Committee, the Submission of the Ministry of Justice in the State Council and the journals of the Special Council, the Special Court of Departments and the General Meeting of the State Council], Publishing House of N.S. Tagantsev, St. Petersburg, 1903, pp. 832-833.

      [18] I.Ya. Foinitskii, Kurs ugolovnogo prava. Chast osobennaya. Posyagatelstva lichnye i imushchestvennye [The Course of Criminal Law. Special Part. Personal and Property Encroachments], St. Petersburg, 1901, p. 162.

      [19] A.A. Zhizhilenko, Prestupleniya protiv imushchestva i isklyuchi-telnykh prav [Crimes against Property and Exclusive Rights], Leningrad, 1928, p. 6, 13, 14.

      [20] L.D. Gaukhman, S.V. Maksimov, Otvetstvennost za prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti [Responsibility for Crimes against Property], Moscow, 1997, p. 65.

      [21] L.D. Gaukhman, Kvalifikatsiya prestuplenii: zakon, teoriya, praktika [Qualification of Crimes: Law, Theory, Practice], Moscow, 2001, p. 84-85.

      [22] Yu.L. Shevtsov, K voprosu ob obekte vymogatelstva [On the Subject of Extortion], Pravo i demokratiya [Right and Democracy], Issue, St. Petersburg, Minsk, 1997, p. 25.

      [23] V.V. Khilyuta, Prestupleniya protiv sobstvennosti i poryadka osu-shchestvleniya ekonomicheskoi deyatelnosti: kontseptualnye osnovy modeli-rovaniya obekta i sistemy [Crimes against Property and the Order of Economic Activity: The Conceptual Basis for Modeling an Object and System], Moscow, 2012, p. 67.

      [24] Yu.I. Lyapunov, Otvetstvennost za vymogatelstvo [Responsibility for Extortion], Zakonnost 4(5) (1997).

      [25] Yu.I. Skuratov, V.M. Lebedev (eds.), Kommentarii k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Osobennaya chast [Commentary on the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Special Part], Moscow, 1996, p. 110.

      [26] N.I. Vetrov, Yu.I. Lyapunov, Ugolovnoe pravo: Osobennaya chast [Criminal Law: Special Part: Textbook], Novyi yurist, Moscow, 1998, p. 203.

      [27] N.A. Belyaev, M.D. Shargorodskii (eds.), Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo prava: v 5-ti t. T. 3. Chast osobennaya [The Course of Soviet Criminal Law: In 5 Volumes. Vol. 3. Special Part] (pp. 355-356), Leningrad University Publishing House, Leningrad, 1973.

      [28] A.A. Pinaev, Ugolovno-pravovaya borba s khishcheniyami [Criminal and Legal Struggle Against Theft], Kharkov, 1975, p. 49.

      [29] A.A. Pinaev, Problemy dalneishego sovershenstvovaniya sovetskogo ugolovnogo zakonodatelstva ob otvetstvennosti za khishcheniya. Avtoref. dis. …dokt. yurid. nauk [Problems of Further Improvement of the Soviet Criminal Law on Liability for Theft (Ph.D. Thesis Abstract)], Kiev, 1984, p. 12-13.

      [30] K. Marx, F. Engels, Sochineniya [Works], Volume 4, Moscow, 1955, p. 168.

      [31] K. Marx, F. Engels, Sochineniya [Works], Volume 16, Moscow, 1960, p. 26.

      [32] K. Marx, F. Engels, Sochineniya [Works], Volume 27, Moscow, 1962, p. 406.

      [33] A.G. Bezverkhov, Imushchestvennye prestupleniya [Property Crimes], Samara, 2002, p. 70.

      [34] S. Soloviev, Istoriya Rossii s drevneishikh vremen [History of Russia from Ancient Times], Volume 1, Moscow, 1857, p. 1.

      [35] R.M. Nureev, Politicheskaya ekonomiya. Dokapitalisticheskie sposoby proizvodstva. Osnovnye zakonomernosti razvitiya: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie dlya studentov ekon. fak. gos. un-tov [Political Economy. Preacpitalist Methods of Production. Basic Regularities of Development: Text Book for the Economy Department Students of Universities], Publishing House of Moscow State University, Moscow, 1991, p. 8-9.

      [36] I.S. Berezin, Kratkaya istoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: Uchebnoe posobie [Short History of Economic Development: Textbook], Russkaya delovaya literature, Moscow, 1998, p. 16.

      [37] I.A. Klepitskii, Sobstvennost i imushchestvo v ugolovnom prave [Property and Proprietorship in Criminal Law], Gosudarstvo i pravo 5 (1997) 74-83.

      [38] I.A. Klepitskii, Obekt i sistema imushchestvennykh prestuplenii v svyazi s reformoi ugolovnogo zakonodatelstva Rossii: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The Object and System of Property Crimes in Connection with the Reform of the Criminal Legislation of Russia (Ph.D. Thesis Abstract)], Moscow, 1995, p. 12.

      [39] L.L. Kruglikov, Problemy teorii ugolovnogo prava: izbrannye stati, 2000-2009 gg. [Problems of the Theory of Criminal Law: Selected Articles, 2000-2009], Yaroslavl, 2010, p. 541, 546.

      [40] G.P. Novoselov, Uchenie ob obekte prestupleniya. Metodologicheskie aspekty [The Doctrine of the Object of Crime. Methodological Aspects], Moscow, 2001, p. 53.

      [41] M.P. Bikmurzin, Predmet prestupleniya: teoretiko-pravovoi analiz. Avtoref. diss. …kandyurid. nauk [Subject of Crime: Theoretical and Legal Analysis (Ph.D. Thesis Abstract)], Saratov, 2005.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Vasilievich Groshev, A., Georgievich Saprunov, A., Vladimirovich Shulga, A., Rakhimmulovich Galiakbarov, R., & Aleksandrovich Tushev, A. (2018). Criminal Legal Protection of Property in Russia in the Conditions of Development of Property Relations. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.15), 240-248. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.15.18681