PToolkit Prototype: Mixed Fidelity for Design Idea Transformation

  • Authors

    • Aeni Zuhana Saidin
    • Nassiriah Shaari
    • Asmidah Alwi
    2018-09-01
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.20.18734
  • Persuasive technology, low fidelity prototype, high fidelity prototype, design iterations
  • This paper describes about the design and development of PToolkit prototype.  We used both low and high fidelity prototype techniques for development of PToolkit prototype interactive application with expert user collaboration in the design iterative phases.  Low fidelity prototype enables exploration for the general layout and information contents, whereas high fidelity prototype allows experimentation in providing experience for intended context and target user group.  Both techniques has proved provide experiences in design context, thus allows an early reflection and design transformation.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] C. Rapp, “Aristotle’s Rhetoric The Agenda of the Rhetoric,†Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta (ed.), 2010.

      [2] J. S. Nelson, A. Megill, and D. N. McCloskey, “The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs,†Hist. Human Sci., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 305–310, 1990.

      [3] B. J. Fogg, Persuasive Technology: Using Computer to Change What We Think and Do. San Francisco USA: Morgan Kaufman, 2003.

      [4] K. Torning, C. Hall, and H. Oinas-kukkonen, “Persuasive System Design : State of the Art and Future Directions,†Inf. Syst., 2009.

      [5] J. Hamari, J. Koivisto, and T. Pakkanen, “Do Persuasive Technologies Persuade ? - A Review of Empirical Studies,†in Persuasive Technology 2014, A. Spagnolli, L. Chittaro, and L. Gamberini, Eds. 2014, pp. 118–136.

      [6] A. Hsu, J. Yang, Y. Yilmaz, S. Haque, C. Can, and A. Blandford, “Persuasive technology for overcoming food cravings and improving snack choices Persuasive technology for overcoming food cravings and improving snack choices,†in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2014, pp. 3403–3412.

      [7] A. Z. Saidin, C. Macaulay, and N. Hine, “Persuasion Knowledge Toolkit: Requirements Gathering with Designer,†in British HCI 2011: Health, Wealth and Happiness, 2011, pp. 503–508.

      [8] T. Fritz, E. M. Huang, G. C. Murphy, and T. Zimmermann, “Persuasive Technology in the Real World : A Study of Long-Term Use of Activity Sensing Devices for Fitness,†in CHI 2014, 2014, pp. 487–496.

      [9] R. Orji, R. L. Mandryk, and J. Vassileva, “Gender and Persuasive Technology : Examining the Persuasiveness of Persuasive Strategies by Gender Groups,†in The 9th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2014), 2014, no. Persuasive, pp. 48–52.

      [10] E. Hennipman, E. R. G. Oppelaar, G. C. Van Der Veer, and B. Bongers, “Rapid and rich prototyping : proof of concepts for experience,†Hum. Factors, 2008.

      [11] R. Shen, “A Navigation System for Crowd Flow Control by Controlling Information Presentation,†2015.

      [12] O. Mubin, “Using Persuasive Mobile Apps to Enhance Children ’ s Health and Well Being : a Sri Lankan Experience,†in CHI 2016, 2016, pp. 2234–2240.

      [13] K. Wu and C. Lu, “Integrating the Personas Technique into the Product Configuration,†2009 Int. Conf. Manag. Serv. Sci., pp. 1–6, Sep. 2009.

      [14] M. Leggett and Z. Bilda, “Exploring design options for interactive video with the Mnemovie hypervideo system,†Des. Stud., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 587–602, Nov. 2008.

      [15] R. Jeffries, J. R. Miller, C. Wharton, and K. M. Uyeda, “User Interface Evaluation in the Real World : A Comparison of Four Techniques,†System, vol. 91, no. c, 1991.

      [16] J. Rieman, M. Franzke, and D. Redmiles, “Usability Evaluation with the Cognitive Walkthrough,†in Human Computer Interaction: Mosaic of Creativity, 1995, pp. 387–388.

      [17] M. Van Den Haak, M. De Jong, and P. J. Schellens, “Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue,†Behav. Inf. Technol., vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 339–351, Sep. 2003.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Zuhana Saidin, A., Shaari, N., & Alwi, A. (2018). PToolkit Prototype: Mixed Fidelity for Design Idea Transformation. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.20), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.20.18734