Investigation of base flow for an axisymmetric suddenly expanded nozzle with micro JET

  • Authors

    • Zakir Ilahi Chaudhary
    • Vilas B. Shinde
    • S A. Khan
    2018-08-24
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.29.18803
  • Flow, Control, L/D Ratio, NPR, Nozzle Flow, Pressure

  • Abstract

    This investigation presents the outcome of the tests conducted to control the pressure in the re-circulation zone. Also, the efficiency of the flow controllers to govern the pressure at the base in a rapidly expanded pipe has been investigated. Tiny jets our in number of 1 mm diameter are positioned at the interval of 90 degrees at 6.5 mm from the central axis of the main jet. The Mach numbers of the abruptly expanded flows studied for base pressure range from 1.1 to 3 and the obtained wall pressure distribution is depicted for Mach number 1.6 and 1.8 respectively. Axi-symmetric round brass tubes were used to join jets; and cross-sectional area of those tubes are 2.56. L/D ratio of the broadened pipe was differed from 1 to 10 and NPR was shifted from 3 to 11. Notwithstanding, the outcomes displayed were for Low L/D values of 4, 3, 2 and 1 individually. Also, when the stream was released to the pipes of the given area ratios, it stayed connected with the channel divider for all the inertial levels and the NPRs tried in the present case. Further it is understood that level of expansion assumes a noteworthy part to choose the pressure at the base and its control adequacy. At whatever point, the stream is over expanded, it leads to the formation of an oblique shock at the nozzle lip, prompting improvement of the pressure in the base locale. Shock waves formation, reflection and recombination proceeded till the pressure winds up noticeably environmental and seen that the stream stays intact for low L/D ratio of 4. Very small scale (micro) jets proved to fit in as controllers for the base pressure.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Bashir, M., Baig, M. A. A., Ismail, A. F., & Khan, S. Control of Suddenly Expanded Flows from Correctly Expanded and under Expanded Nozzles at Supersonic Mach number for Area Ratio 2.56. International Organization of Scientific Research-Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSRJMCE), 76-82.

      [2] Brinkhorst, S., von Lavante, E., & Wendt, G. (2017). Experimental and numerical investigation of the cavitation-induced choked flow in a herschel venturi-tube. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 54, 56-67.

      [3] Buoni, M., Dietz, D., Aslam, K., & Subramaniam, V. (2001). Simulation of compressible gas flow in a micronozzle. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 35th AIAA Thermophysics Conference, AIAA.

      [4] Buoni, M., Dietz, D., Aslam, K., & Subramaniam, V. (2001). Simulation of compressible gas flow in a micronozzle-Effect of walls on shock structure. Paper presented at the 35th AIAA Thermophysics Conference.

      [5] Chaudhary, Z. I., Shinde, V. B., Bashir, M., & Khan, S. A. (2017). Experimental Investigation on the Effectiveness of Active Control Mechanism on Base Pressure at Low Supersonic Mach Numbers Innovative Design and Development Practices in Aerospace and Automotive Engineering (pp. 197-209): Springer.

      [6] Chaudhuri, A., & Hadjadj, A. (2016). Numerical investigations of transient nozzle flow separation. Aerospace Science and Technology, 53, 10-21.

      [7] Deprés, D., Reijasse, P., & Dussauge, J. (2004). Analysis of unsteadiness in afterbody transonic flows. AIAA Journal, 42(12), 2541-2550.

      [8] Dutton, J., Herrin, J., Molezzi, M., Mathur, T., & Smith, K. (1995). Recent progress on high-speed separated base flows. Paper presented at the 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.

      [9] Ekanayake, S. (2013). Numerical simulation of a convergent divergent supersonic nozzle flow.

      [10] El-Alti, M. (2012). Active Flow Control for Drag Reduction of Heavy Vehicles: Citeseer.

      [11] Gamble E., Terrell, D., & DeFrancesco, R. (2004). Nozzle selection and design criteria. Paper presented at the 40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit.

      [12] Hsiung, J.-L., & Chow, C.-Y. (1995). Computed drag reduction on a projectile using porous surfaces. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 32(3), 450-455.

      [13] Hyde, E., Escher, W., & Roddy, J. (2003). Marquardt's Mach 4.5 supercharged ejector ramjet high-performance aircraft engine project. Paper presented at the 36th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit.

      [14] Ibrahim, A., & Filippone, A. (2007). Effect of a Porosity Strength on Drag Reduction of a Transonic Projectile. Journal of Aircraft, 44(1), 310-316.

      [15] Ikaza, D. (2000). Thrust vectoring nozzle for modern military aircraft: DTIC Document.

      [16] Jahanmiri, M. (2010). Active flow control: a review: Chalmers University of Technology.

      [17] Khan, S., Bashir, M., & Asadullah, M. (2016). An investigation of base flow control by wall pressure analysis in a suddenly expansion nozzle. Journal of Scientific Research and Development.

      [18] Khan, S., & Rathakrishnan, E. (2002). Active control of suddenly expanded flows from overexpanded nozzles. International Journal of Turbo & Jet-Engines, 19(1), 119-126.

      [19] Khan, S. A., & Rathakrishnan, E. (2004). Active Control of Suddenly Expanded Flow from Under Expanded Nozzles. International Journal of Turbo and Jet Engines,(IJT), 21(4), 233-253.

      [20] King, R. (2010). Active Flow Control II: Springer.

      [21] Koppenwallner, G., Rammenzweig, D., & Strunck, V. (1981). Rocket exhaust jet flow and upstream flow field interference. Paper presented at the Experiments and Flow Field Analysis. Congress on Missile Aerodynamics, Trondheim (Norway).

      [22] Liang, S.-M., & Fu, J.-K. (1991). Passive control method for drag reduction for transonic projectiles. Paper presented at the ninth Applied Aerodynamics Conference.

      [23] Lipfert, F., & Fruchtman, I. (1972). Nonuniform flow field generation for supersonic compressor stator development: Design and preliminary results.

      [24] Mates, S. P., & Settles, G. S. (2005). A study of liquid metal atomization using close-coupled nozzles, Part 1: Gas dynamic behavior. Atomization and Sprays, 15(1).

      [25] McLellan, J. W. (2006). The effects of diamond injector angles on flow structures at various Mach numbers. Texas A&M University.

      [26] McNally, J., Fernandez, E., Robertson, G., Kumar, R., Taira, K., Alvi, F., Murayama, K. (2015). Drag reduction on a flat-back ground vehicle with active flow control. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 145, 292-303.

      [27] Mousavi, S. M., & Roohi, E. (2014). Three-dimensional investigation of the shock train structure in a convergent–divergent nozzle. Acta Astronautica, 105(1), 117-127.

      [28] Rathakrishnan, E., & Sreekanth, A. (1995). Rarefied flow through sudden enlargements. Fluid Dynamics Research, 16(2-3), 131-145.

      [29] Sundararaj, M., Yuvaraj, C., Gopinath, S., & Elangovan, S. (2014). Effect of Rib Geometry on the Base Pressure of Suddenly Expanded Flows. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 7(S5), 61-63.

      [30] Sutton, G. P., & Biblarz, O. (2016). Rocket propulsion elements: John Wiley & Sons.

      [31] Tripathi, A., Manisankar, C., & Verma, S. (2015). Control of base pressure for a boat-tailed axisymmetric afterbody via base geometry modifications. Aerospace Science and Technology, 45, 284-293.

      [32] Viswanath, P. (1996). Flow management techniques for base and afterbody drag reduction. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 32(2-3), 79-129.

      [33] Washburn, A., Gorton, S., & Anders, S. (2002). A Snapshot of Active Flow Control Research at NASA Langley. Paper presented at the first Flow Control Conference.

      [34] Wu, J., & New, T. (2017). An investigation on supersonic bevelled nozzle jets. Aerospace Science and Technology, 63, 278-293.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Ilahi Chaudhary, Z., B. Shinde, V., & A. Khan, S. (2018). Investigation of base flow for an axisymmetric suddenly expanded nozzle with micro JET. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.29), 236-242. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.29.18803

    Received date: 2018-09-02

    Accepted date: 2018-09-02

    Published date: 2018-08-24