Determination of Hydraulic Conductivity for Pure Gravel, Pure Sand And Grain Mixtures
-
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.14.18833 -
Colmation, Grain size distribution, Gravel, Hydraulic conductivity, Sand. -
Abstract
The colmation process which describes the infiltration of fine sediments into the river beds is prominent for many years. However, due to the lack of knowledge and the absence of specific parameters, the colmation cannot be properly described. Therefore, hydraulic conductivity can be a virtuous way to describe this process. The aim of this study is to determine the hydraulic conductivity of gravel and sand mixtures. By using the KSAT device, hydraulic conductivity values from the laboratory samples were determined. Based on the data obtained from the experiment, the threshold of grain size distribution and hydraulic conductivity for the laboratory samples were established. The results show that when there is high percentage of coarse particle in a mixture compared to the percentage of the fine particle, the value of hydraulic conductivity tends to increase.
Â
Â
-
References
[1] VeliÄković B (2005), Colmation as one of the processes in interaction between the groundwater and surface water. Facta Universitatis - Series Architecture and Civil Engineering 23, 165–172.
[2] Brunke M & Gonser T (1997), The ecological significance of exchange processes between rivers and groundwater. Freshwater Biology 37, 1–33.
[3] Frostick LE, Lucas PM & Reid I (1984), The infiltration of fine matrices into coarse-grained alluvial sediments and its implications for stratigraphical interpretation. Journal of the Geological Society of London 141, 955–965.
[4] Lisle TE (1989), Sediment transport and resulting deposition in spawning gravels, north coastal California. Water Resources Research 25, 1303–1319.
[5] Droppo IG & Stone M (1994), Inâ€channel surficial fineâ€grained sediment laminae. Part I: Physical characteristics and formational processes. Hydrological Processes 8, 101–111.
[6] Boulton AJ (2007), Hyporheic rehabilitation in rivers: Restoring vertical connectivity. Freshwater Biology 52, 632–650.
[7] Lenet DR, Penrose DL & Eagleson K. Biological evaluation of non-point source pollutants in North Carolina streams and rivers. Department of Natural Resources and Community Development, Division of Environmental Management, Environmental Monitoring Unit, Biological Monitoring Group, 1979.
[8] Gayraud S & Philippe M (2003), Influence of bed-sediment features on the interstitial habitat available for macroinvertebrates in 15 French streams. International Review of Hydrobiology 88, 77–93.
[9] Hvorslev MJ (1951), Time Lag and Soil Permeability in Ground-Water Observations. Bulletin no 36, 53.
[10] Dahm CN & Valett HM, Chapter 6: Hyporheic Zones. In: Methods in Stream Ecology, Academic Press, (1996), pp: 107–99.
[11] Webb TH, Claydon JJ & Harris SR (2000), Quantifying variability of soil physical properties within soil series to address modern land-use issues on the Canterbury Plains, New Zealand. Australian Journal of Soil Research 38, 1115–1129.
[12] Biggar JW & Nielsen DR (1976), Spatial variability of the leaching characteristics of a field soil. Water Resources Research 12, 78–84.
[13] Hern SC, Vadose Zone Modeling of Organic Pollutants, 1st Edition. Chelsea, Michigan: Lewis Publishers, pp: 295.
[14] Todd DK & Mays LW, Groundwater Hydrology, John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 2005, pp: 652.
[15] Ryan RJ & Packman AI (2006), Changes in streambed sediment characteristics and solute transport in the headwaters of Valley Creek, an urbanizing watershed. Journal of Hydrology 323, 74–91.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Farahin Kamaruddin, S., Zafyrah Mohd Zahid, A., Seitz, L., & Kassim, J. (2018). Determination of Hydraulic Conductivity for Pure Gravel, Pure Sand And Grain Mixtures. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.14), 428-431. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.14.18833Received date: 2018-09-02
Accepted date: 2018-09-02