The Role of Human Factors in Emergency Management: A Malaysian Company Perspective

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    Effective emergency management aims to minimize loss during real emergency or disaster.  For that reason, Public Listed Oil and Gas (PLONG) companies have conducted numerous emergency response exercise (ERE) to evaluate their capability in handling emergency situations, but challenges in PLONG ERE reports obtained did not clearly identify nor categorized challenges based on emergency management effectiveness. With the objective of identifying challenges and influence of human factors based on elements of emergency management effectiveness, documents were analysed towards PLONG ERE reports in 2015. Results were then discussed and validated by experts where it was found that challenges were identified in each element of emergency management and the number of challenges increases with the increasing Tiers of ERE. Trends were also found at each Tier of ERE indicating that the human factors in each element of effective emergency management where 46% of the challenges are organization structures. It is believed that more detailed studies could be contributed to the understanding and further analyse the role of human factors towards effective emergency management..

     

     


  • Keywords


    Emergency management, emergency exercise, MNSC 20, Human factors

  • References


      [1] S. Khairilmizal et al., “Evolution of Disaster and Disaster Management Policy in Malaysia,” Adv. Sci. Lett., vol. 22, no. 12, 2016.

      [2] S. Khairilmizal, M. F. Hussin, A. R. Hussain, M. H. Jusoh, A. A. Sulaiman, and K. Ainul Husna, “Implementation of Disaster Management Policy in Malaysia and its Compliance Towards International Disaster Management Framework,” Information, vol. 19, no. 8A, 2016.

      [3] MNSC, Policy and Mechanism of Disaster in Malaysia. Malaysia: Malaysia National Security Council, Prime Minister Department, 2012, p. 44.

      [4] PETRONAS, PETRONAS Contingency Planning Standard, 5th ed., no. PTS 18.40.01. Kuala Lumpur: PETRONAS, 2015.

      [5] PETRONAS, Emergency Drill and Exercise Guideline, no. PTS 18.05.09. Kuala Lumpur: PETRONAS, 2014.

      [6] S. Khairilmizal et al., “The Need for an Integrated Disaster Management System for Lead Responding Agency in Malaysia During Response and Recovery Phase,” Information, vol. 19, no. 8A, pp. 3307–3311, 2016.

      [7] P. Salmon, N. Stanton, D. Jenkins, and G. Walker, “Coordination during multi-agency emergency response: issues and solutions,” Disaster Prev. Manag., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 140–158, 2011.

      [8] R. L. Heath, J. Lee, and L. Ni, “Crisis and Risk Approaches to Emergency Management Planning and Communication: The Role of Similarity and Sensitivity,” Journal of Public Relations Research, vol. 21. pp. 123–141, 2009.

      [9] S. Khairilmizal et al., “Criteria for an Integrated Disaster Management System for Lead Responding Agency in Malaysia,” Adv. Sci. Lett., vol. 23, no. 5, 2017.

      [10] G. A. Bowen, “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method,” Qual. Res. J., vol. 9, no. 2, p. 19, 2009.

      [11] S. Khairilmizal et al., “Policy on Disaster Management in Malaysia : The Need of Supporting Governance,” Adv. Sci. Lett., vol. 22, no. 12, 2016.

      [12] M. F. Hussin, B. Wang, and R. Hipnie, “The reliability and validity of Basic Offshore Safety and Emergency Training knowledge test,” J. King Saud Univ. - Eng. Sci., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 95–105, 2012..


 

View

Download

Article ID: 19032
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.7.19032




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.