Barriers on Using Social Media As Learning Tools Among Korean Pre-service Social Studies Teachers
-
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.7.19041 -
Technical barriers, Situational and dispositional barriers, Institutional barriers -
Abstract
This study aims to identify underlying types of deterrents on using social media as learning tools among Korean pre-service social studies teachers and to analyze whether gender and age are predictive of membership in types of deterrents. In order to achieve this goal, this research was conducted at Daegu University, Korea. For the purpose of this study, 207 social studies pre-service teachers were selected as sample, and responses were analyzed using latent class analysis (LCA) and multinominal logistic regression. We conducted analysis using PROC LCA for SAS environment. Study results are as follows. 1) the respondents were grouped into five latent classes: the technical barriers(12%), the situational and dispositional barriers(48%), the severe barriers(11%), the institutional barriers(23%), and the semi-economical barriers(6%). 2) Both gender (p<.001) and age(p<.001) were predictors of latent class membership.
Â
-
References
[1] Renata, B. and M. Jana, 2012, E-learning as a motivation in teaching physics, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012. 64: p. 328-331.
[2] Harandi, S. R., Effects of e-learning on students' motivation, Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015. 181: p. 423-430.
[3] Luke K. Fryer, H. and N. Bovee, Supporting students' motivation for e-learning: Teachers matter on and offline, Internet and Higher Education, 2016. 30: p. 21-29
[4] Yilmaz, R., Exploring the role of e-learning readiness on student satisfaction and motivation in flipped classroom, Computers in Human Behavior, 2017. 70: p. 251-260.
[5] Giesbers, B. B. Rienties, D. Tempelaar, and W. Gijselaers, Investigating the relations between motivation, tool use, participation, and performance in an e-learning course using web-videoconferencing, Computers in Human Behavior, 2013. 29: p. 285-292.
[6] Bingimlas, K., The barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, science and technology education, 2009. 5: p. 235-245
[7] Adilson C. and A. S. Godoy, Barriers and incentives to organizational learning: A case study, REGE, Sao Paulo– SP, Brasil, 2010. 18: p. 513-530.
[8] Assareha, A. M. and H. Bidokhtb, Barriers to e-teaching and e-learning, Procedia Computer Science, 2011. 3: p. 791–795.
[9] Stoffregen, J., J. M. Pawlowski, and H. Pirkkalainen, A Barrier Framework for open E-Learning in public administrations, Computers in Human Behavior, 2015. 51: p. 674-684.
[10] Vissers, D., M. Rowe, S. Islam, and J. Taeymans, Digital literacy of physiotherapy students: a barrier for international E-learning? The 4th European Congress of the ER-WCPT / Physiotherapy, 2016. 102S: p. 125-216.
[11] Savoldelli, A., C. Codagnone, G. Misuraca, Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption, Government Information Quarterly, 2014. 31: p. 563-571.
[12] Lanza, S. T., and L. M. Collins, A mixture model of discontinuous development in heavy drinking from ages 18 to 30: The role of college enrollment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 2006. 67: p. 552–561
[13] Celeux, G., and G. Soromenho, An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 1996. 13: p. 195–212.
[14] Lanza et al, PROC LCA: A SAS Procedure for Latent Class Analysis, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2007. 14(4): p. 671-694.
[15] Cross, K.P., The missing link: Connecting adult learners to learning resources: New York: College Entrance Examination Board, 1978.
[16] Cross, K.P., Adults as learners. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Kang, W., & Choi, J. (2018). Barriers on Using Social Media As Learning Tools Among Korean Pre-service Social Studies Teachers. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.7), 522-524. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.7.19041Received date: 2018-09-05
Accepted date: 2018-09-05