Application of Remote Sensing for Estimation of Carbon Storage in a Plantation Forest on Reclaimed Land of Banpu Lignite Mine and Adjacent Natural Forest, Northern Thailand
-
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.7.19043 -
Carbon, Dry dipterocarp forest, Plantation forest, Remote sensing, Reclaimed mine land -
Abstract
The carbon storage assessment of a 18-year-old plantation forest (PF) on reclaimed land of Banpu lignite mine, northern Thailand, was compared to nearby natural forest (NF), the dry dipterocarp forest (DDF). Vegetation study was taken using the sampling plot, each of size 40×40 m, and the total number of 12 and 10 plots were used for the PF and the NF, respectively. Data were obtained by measuring stem girths at breast height (1.3 m above ground, gbh) and heights of all trees with height over 1.5 m. The standing biomass and stored carbon amounts were calculated using allometric equations. The relationship between the carbon storage (CS) with actual wavelength associated with the vegetation was taken. LANDSAT-8 OLI images captured in 2015 were used for correlation and the multiple regression analysis for selection of the best equation to estimate the CS. It is found that the total number of 47 species (38 genera, 20 families) and 98 species (85 genera, 45 families) were existed in the PF and the NF, respectively. The CS amounts in plant biomass of the PF and the NF were determined in the following order; 47.80 ± 9.24 Mg ha-1 and 64.39 ± 13.7 Mg ha-1. The best-fit model for estimation of the CS in study plots showed the relationship between the ratio vegetation index (RVI) and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI); the PF, CS = (3467NDVI) - (743RVI) + 392 with R2 = 0.96, and the NF, CS = (217RVI) - (542NDVI) - 194 with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.79. The average CS amounts of the NF and the PF by remote sensing assessment were estimated at 63.54 Mg ha-1 and 41.60 Mg ha-1, respectively. The CS estimation of the PF was lower than the NF. Improving planting technique is required for forest plantation on the reclaimed mine land to increase plant species diversity, biomass and carbon storages.
Â
Â
-
References
[1] H. S. Duzgun and N. Demirel, Remote Sensing of the Mine Environment. CRC Press/Balkema. Leiden, Netherland, 2011.
[2] J. J. Landsberg and S. T. Gower, Application of Physiological Ecology to Forest Management. Academic Press, Inc., USA., 1997.
[3] R.H. Waring, and S. W. Running, Forest Ecosystems: Analysis at multiple scales. Second edition, Academic Press, San Diego, USA., 1998.
[4] T. Phongkhamphanh, Variations in plant diversity and carbon storage among subtype communities in a dry dipterocarp community forest of Mae Tha sub-district, Mae On district, Chiang Mai province. Thai J. For, 2015. (3): p. 83-98.
[5] S. Khamyong, T.Seramethakun and T.Seeloy-ounkeaw, Evaluation of planted tree species and plant succession in forest plantations for land restoration in Mae Moa lignite mining area. The final report to EGAT, Bangkok, Thailand, 2012. 355p.
[6] S.E. Franklin, Remote Sensing for Sustainable Forest Management. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 2001. 407p.
[7] S. Pattanakiat, W. Chatpanyacharoen, and K. Charoenjit, Integrating vegetation and physical indices with satellite imageries for carbon storage estimation in forest plantation of Thailand. Journal of Remote Sensing and GIS Association of Thailand. Vol. 13 No. 1 (Jan.-Apr. 2012), 2012. p. 23-29.
[8] N. Yusanto, Carbon Stock Analysis of Land Reclamation in Coal Mining Post (Studies in Tanah Bumbu District of South Kalimantan Province). International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 2016, 6(5): 181-186 DOI: 10.5923/j.ijaf.20160605.02.
[9] Suppagarn T., Waragorn S. and Pirat. J., Application of Vegetation and Soil Indices for Monitoring the Reclamation Area at Phadeng Zinc Mine in Tak Province, Northern Thailand. Asia-Pacific Conference on Engineering and Applied Science, Tokyo, Japan, August 25-27, 2016. p. 402-408.
[10] S. Boonsang, and W. Arunpraparat, Estimation of Above-Ground Carbon Sequestration of Forest Using Remote Sensing Techniques in Mae Tuen Wildlife Sanctuary, Tak Province. Thai J. For, 2011 30(3): p. 14-23.
[11] K. Ogino, D. Ratanawongs, T. Tsutsumi, and T. Shidei, The Primary Production of Tropical Forest in Thailand. The Southeast Asian Studies, 1967. 5(1): p. 122-154.
[12] H. K. Ogawa, K. Yoda, K.Ogino, and T. Kira, Comparative ecological study on three main types of forest vegetation in Thailand. II. plant biomass. Nature and Life in Southeast Asia, 1965 (4): p. 49-80
[13] T. Tsutsumi, K. Yoda, P. Dhanmanonda and B. Prachaiyo., Chapter 3, Forest: Falling, burning and regenerationâ€. In shifting cultivation: An experiment at Nam Phrom, northeast Thailand and its implications of upland farming in the monsoon tropics. K. Kuma and C. Pairntra (eds.) Kyoto University, Japan, 1983. p: 13-62.
[14] J.P.Kimmins, Chapter 17: Ecological succession. In Forest Ecology: A foundation for sustainable forest management and environmental ethics in forestry. 3rd ed., Pearson Education, Inc., 2004. p: 463-515.
[15] N. Nuanurai, Comparison of Leaf Area Index, Above-Ground Biomass and Carbon Sequestration of Forest Ecosystems by Forest Inventory and Remote Sensing at Kaeng Krachan National Park Thailand. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, 2005.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Thiteja, S., Khamyong, S., Charoenpanyanet, A., Huttago, P., & Boontun, A. (2018). Application of Remote Sensing for Estimation of Carbon Storage in a Plantation Forest on Reclaimed Land of Banpu Lignite Mine and Adjacent Natural Forest, Northern Thailand. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.7), 529-533. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.7.19043Received date: 2018-09-05
Accepted date: 2018-09-05