A Study on the Behaviour of 15 Storeys 2x3bay with Soil Flexibility

  • Authors

    • Deepa S
    • Venkatesh S V
    • I R.Mithanthaya
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.34.19567
  • Modified winkler method, Continuum method, Raft foundation, Horizontal irregularity and Vertical irregularity.
  • Previous analytical study was precisely based on structures with rigid base and soil conditions where neglected which showed considerable difference in the behaviour of structures. The present study is mainly based on flexible base considering soil effect with raft foundation. The structure considered is in seismic zone 5 with different types of soil condition such as hard soil, medium soil and soft soil. Also the structural irregularity is compared such as regular structure, structure with horizontal irregularity and structure with vertical irregularity. The soil is idealised by Modified Winkler method and Continuum method with Raft foundation. Overall 9 models where analysed in each method. The results are compared between Modified Winkler method and Continuum method with regular, horizontal and vertical irregularities for all 3 types of soil (Hard soil, Medium soil and Soft soil). Results where compared for Base shear, Axial forces, Time period and Displacement which shows that Continuum method of SSI gives realistic results compared to Modified Winkler method.

                                                                                                                                          

     

  • References

    1. [1] Shivanand B, H S Vidhyadhara, Design of 3D frame on Sloping ground: International Journal of research in Engineering, Vol.3, Issue 08, Aug-2014,Department of Civil Engineering, Poojya Doddappa Appa college of Engineering, Gulbarga, India

      [2] Sanjay Sengupta, A comparitive study is done for different thickness of shear wall of different height of the building , International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, Vol3, Issue:11/Nov2014

      [3] M.D. Kevadkar, P.B. Kodag, Lateral Load analysis of RCC Building International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER) , Vol.3, Issue.3, May-June2013, pp1428-1434, Department of Civil Engineering, Sinhgad college of Engineering, Pune, India.

      [4] Ashik S. Parasiya, Paresh Nimodiya, A review on Comparative analysis of brace frame with conventional Lateral load resisting frame in RC structures using softwareInternal Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Studies./III/I/Oct-Dec;2013/88-93 Veerayatan Group of Institution, Faculty of Engineering, Gujarat , India.

      [5] Arshad K Hashmi, Preliminary design and analysis of masonry infilled R/C frame based on storey drift limitations subjected to lateral loads, Journal of Structural Engineering,VOL41, No.5 Dec2014-Jan 2015, pp509-523

      [6] X.K. Zou, C.M. Chan, Optimal Seismic performance based design of reinforced concrete buildings using Nonlinear pushover analysis: Engineering Structures 27(2005) 1289-1302. Department of Civil Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.

      [7] Dong- Guen lee, Efficient seismic analysis of high rise building structures with the effects of floor slab: Engineering Structures 24(2002)613-623. Department of Architectural Engineering Sungkyunkwan University, South Korea.

      [8] M. Ashraf*, Z.A. Siddiqi and M.A. Javed Configuration of a multi-storey building subjected to lateral forces Asian journal of civil engineering (building and housing) VOL. 9, NO. 5 (2008)Pages 525-537. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    S, D., S V, V., & R.Mithanthaya, I. (2018). A Study on the Behaviour of 15 Storeys 2x3bay with Soil Flexibility. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3.34), 813-817. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.34.19567