Development of the Method of Formation of the Architecture of the Innovation Program in the System "University–State–Business"

  • Authors

    • Varvara Piterska
    • Sergey Rudenko
    • Anatoliy Shakhov
    2018-09-15
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.3.19793
  • Architecture of Program, Innovation Program, Mission, Project Management, Triple Helix Model.

  • We investigated the mechanisms of increase of efficiency of innovative activity on the basis of methodology of management of projects and programs of sustainable development on the basis of the GPM Global P5 standard as well as the triple helix model "University–State–Business". This method takes into account the current trends of program and project management of innovation. The mechanism of target distribution for universities 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 is investigated. Suggested model of the innovation program management is based on the model of the triple helix interaction and allows to take into account the interests of all groups of stakeholders. The mechanism of formation of the mission of the innovation program, which allows to determine the strategic goals of the innovation program participants, namely – the competitiveness of the University for higher education institutions, the quality of life of the population for the state and the profit for business. The method of formation of the architecture of the innovation program in the system "University–State–Business" has been developed with the integration of the interests of all participants of the program. The method of creating an office of management of the innovation program is proposed taking into account the model of the architecture of the innovation program.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] GPM Global P5 Standard for Sustainability in Project Management V.1.5.1.

      [2] Karpov A. O. (2017) Modern university as the driver of economic growth: models and missions. Issues of economics, 3, 58–76.

      [3] Official site of the State Statistics Service of Ukraine. URL: https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/

      [4] Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions «Innovation policy: updating the Union's approach in the context of the Lisbon strategy» (Brussels, 11.3.2003 COM(2003) 112 final.

      [5] Bushuev, S. D., Bushueva, N. S. & et. al. (2011) Creation and development of competitive project-oriented high-tech enterprises. Nikolaev: Torubary E.S., 260.

      [6] Bushuev, S. D., Bushueva, N. S., & Jaroshenko, R. F. (2012). Harmonization models property development programme in turbulence environment. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 10, 9–13.

      [7] Rudenko, S., & Andrievska, V. (2016). Concept of project selection and its formalization in the absence of complete information. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2/3 (80), 4–10. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.65618

      [8] Bushuyev, S. D., Bushuyev, D. A., Rogozina, V. B., & Mikhieieva O. V. (2015). Convergence of knowledge in project management. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 8th International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems: IDAACS, 496–500. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IDAACS.2015.7341355

      [9] Tanaka, K. (2014). The integration of engineering and program management with the marine economy. Shipbuilding And Marine Infrastructure, 1 (1). DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15589/smi20140108

      [10] Pіterska, V. M., Kramskiy, S. O. (2017) Methodological basis of innovative project-oriented organizations’ management. Management of the development of complex systems, 30, 11–20.

      [11] Pіterska, V. M. (2016) Using of the project-oriented approach in the innovative activity management. Bulletin of National Technical University "KhPI", 1 (1173), 35–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20998/2413-3000.2016.1173.7

      [12] Piterskaya, V., Bokareva, M. (2013) Energy model of the project-oriented organization value management. European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 10 (61), 199–202.

      [13] Donal O’Connell (2011) Harvesting External Innovation. Managing External Relationships and Intellectual Property, 21–26.

      [14] Eveleens, C. (2010) Innovation management; a literature review of innovation process models and their implications. Working Paper HAN University of Applied Sciences, 23, 112–121.

      [15] Itskovich, G. (2010) Triple helix. Universities–Enterprises–State. Innovation in action. GUSUR, 238–245.

      [16] Kolesnykova, E. V., & Fen, M. (2014). Aspects of practical management of the image of an educational institution. Information technologies in education, science and production, 2 (7), 216–227.

      [17] Fesenko, T., Shakhov, A., Fesenko, G., Bibik, N., & Tupchenko, V. (2018). Modeling of customer oriented construction project management using the gender logic systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1/3 (91). 50–59. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.123124

      [18] Fesenko, T., Shakhov, A., & Fesenko, G. (2017). Modeling of maturity of gender-oriented project management office. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5/3 (89), 30–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.110286

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Piterska, V., Rudenko, S., & Shakhov, A. (2018). Development of the Method of Formation of the Architecture of the Innovation Program in the System "University–State–Business". International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.3), 232-239. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.3.19793