Ergonomics assessment of current aircraft passenger seat design against Malaysian anthropometry data

  • Authors

    • Negin Ozve Aminian
    • Fairuz Izzuddin Romli
    2018-10-09
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.13.21322
  • aircraft seat, anthropometry, ergonomics, passenger seat, Malaysian.

  • Abstract

    There have been many complaints from aircraft passengers regarding the cabin comfort level during flight. One of the main cabin aspects that influence the level of passenger comfort is identified as the passenger seat. In this study, the representative of the current aircraft seat design is evaluated against anthropometry data of Malaysians. This is done to establish whether there is any mismatch between the seat design and the anthropometry of the Malaysian passengers such that it contributes to the low cabin comfort experiences. Based on the findings, it can be generally concluded that the current aircraft seat needs to be better and more ergonomically designed to match with the Malaysian anthropometry in order to potentially provide more comfortability for the Malaysian aircraft passengers.

     

  • References

    1. [1] Tan C, Chen W, Liu H, Rauterberg M (2009), Adaptive framework and user preference modeling for economy class aircraft passenger seat. 3rd UKSim European Symposium on Computer Modeling and Simulation

      [2] Brundrett G (2001), Comfort and health in commercial aircraft: a literature review. The Journal of The Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 121(1), 29-37

      [3] Zhang L, Helander MG, Drury CG (1996), Identifying factors of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Human Factors 38(3), 377-389

      [4] Richards LG, Jacobson ID (1975), Ride quality evaluation I: Questionnaire studies of airline passenger comfort. Ergonomics 18(2), 129-150

      [5] Tan CF, Chen W, Kimman F, Rauterberg GWM (2009), Sleeping posture analysis of economy class aircraft seat. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering

      [6] Hinninghofen H, Enck P (2006), Passenger well-being in airplanes. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical 129(1-2), 80-85

      [7] Harisinghani M, Blake M, Saksena M, Hahn P, Gervais D, Zalis M, Fernandes L, Mueller PR (2004), Importance and effects of altered workplace ergonomics in modern radiology suites. RadioGraphics 24(2), 615-627

      [8] Mohd. Yusuff R, Daruis D, Md. Dawal S, Hassan S (2016), Development of an anthropometry database for the Malaysian population: Problems and challenges. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine 16(Suppl. 2), 36-43

      [9] Vink P (2011), Aircraft interior comfort and design. Boca Raton: CRC Press

      [10] Gordon C, Churchill T, Clauser C, Mcconville J, Tebbetts I, Walker R (1989), Anthropometric survey of U. S. army personnel: Methods and summary statistics

      [11] Wagner D, Birt J, Snyder M, Duncanson J (1996), Human Factors Design Guide. Report of Federal Aviation Administration Technical Center (DOT/FAA/CT-96/1)

      [12] Korte J (2013), South African anthropometric dimensions for the design of an ergonomic office chair. Rhodes University, South Africa

      [13] Kroemer KH (2005), Extra-ordinary ergonomics: How to accommodate small and big persons, the disabled and elderly, expectant mothers and children. Boca Raton: CRC Press

      [14] International Organization for Standardization (2008), ISO7250: Basic human body measurements for technological design - Part 1: Body measurement definitions and landmarks. Geneva, Switzerland

      [15] Bridger R (2008), Introduction to ergonomics. Boca Raton: CRC Press

      [16] Panero J, Zelnik M (1992), Human dimension and interior space. New York: Watson-Guptill Publications

      [17] Goossens R (1994), Biomechanics of body support: A study of load distribution, shear, decubitus risk and form of the spine. Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Netherlands

      [18] Kroemer H, Kroemer H and Kroemer-Elbert K (2000), Ergonomics: How to design for ease and efficiency. New Jersey: Prentice Hall

      [19] Kremser F, Guenzkofer F, Sedimeter C, Sabbah O, Bengler K (2012), Aircraft seating comfort: The influence of seat pitch on passengers' well-being. Work 41, 4936-4942

      [20] Reed M, Schneider L, Ricci L (1994), Survey of auto seat design recommendations for improved comfort. Report of the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, USA

      [21] Japan Standards Association (2002), Ergonomics - Basic human body measurements for technological design

      [22] Cumberland C, Bowey G (1950), Passenger seats for aircraft: A survey of the considerations to be borne in mind in designing furniture for maximum safety and comfort. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology 22(9), 250-255

      [23] Roskam J (1986), Airplane design: Determination of stability, control and performance characteristics: FAR and military requirements. Ottawa: Roskam Aviation and Engineering Corporation

      [24] Tayyari F, Smith J (1997), Occupational ergonomics: principles and applications. London: Chapman & Hall

      [25] Karwowski W, Marras W (2003), Occupational ergonomics: design and management of work systems. Boca Ratopn: CRC Press

      [26] Pheasant S, Haslegrave C (2005), Bodyspace: Anthropometry, ergonomics and the design of work. Boca Raton: CRC Press

      [27] Karwowski W (2001), International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors. Boca Raton: CRC Press

      [28] Drury C, Coury B (1982), A methodology for chair evaluation. Applied Ergonomics 13(3), 195-202

      [29] Quigley C, Southall D, Freer M, Moody A, Porter J (2001), Anthropometric study to update minimum aircraft seating standards. Report to Joint Aviation Authorities

      [30] Bhise V D (2011), Ergonomics in the automotive design process. Boca Raton: CRC Press

      [31] Karmegam K, Salit MS, Ismail MY, Ismail N, Tamrin SB, Gobalakrishnan K, Palanimuthu S, Palaniandy T (2011), Anthropometry of Malaysian young adults. Journal of Human Ergology 40(1-2), 37-46

      [32] Mohd. Yusuff R, Hussain M, Syed Abdul Rashid S (2009), Anthropometry dimensions of older Malaysians: Comparison of age, gen-der and ethnicity. Asian Social Science 5(6), 133-140

      [33] Mohamad D, Md Deros B, Ismail A, Daruis D (2010), Development of a Malaysian anthropometric database. Proceedings of World Engineering Congress

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Ozve Aminian, N., & Izzuddin Romli, F. (2018). Ergonomics assessment of current aircraft passenger seat design against Malaysian anthropometry data. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.13), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.13.21322

    Received date: 2018-10-08

    Accepted date: 2018-10-08

    Published date: 2018-10-09