Trustworthy E-Commerce Model for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

  • Authors

    • Hamed F.H.O
    • Madihah M.S
    • Kamaruzzaman S
    2018-10-07
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.15.21435
  • Behavioral intention, E-commerce, Perceived trust, Perceived use, SME, Trustworthy model.
  • Abstract

    This paper presents a trustworthy model for an e-commerce website consisting of technologically-driven factors that influence the e-commerce usage and by employing the Theory of Planned Behaviour as the basis of developing the model. For this paper, self-administered survey questionnaires were distributed to 600 respondents at small medium enterprises (SMEs) in Libya, the structural equation modeling (SEM) was utilized to test the factor analysis. Based on 296 of 600 respondents of the administered questionnaires, the results showed that the perceived ease of usage and perceived ease of trust are highly significant when it comes to the usage of ecommerce. Both parameters recorded a preference score of 52% and 36% respectively. As a result, these two factors are considered to be the main factors that influence the e-commerce usage by SMEs in Libya.

     

  • References

    1. [1] Simmons, G., Armstrong, G. A., & Durkin, M. G. A conceptualization of the determinants of small business website adoption: Setting the research agenda. International Small Business Journal, 2008, 26(3), 351-389.

      [2] Escobar-Rodríguez, T., & Bonsón-Fernández, R. Analysing online purchase intention in Spain: Fashion e-commerce. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2017, 15(3), 599-622.

      [3] Lin, X., Featherman, M., Brooks, S. L., & Hajli, N. Exploring gender differences in online consumer purchase decision making: An online product presentation perspective. Proceedings of the Information Systems Frontiers, 2018, 1-5.

      [4] Sullivan, Y. W., & Kim, D. J. Assessing the effects of consumers’ product evaluations and trust on repurchase intention in e-commerce environments. International Journal of Information Management, 2018, 39, 199-219.

      [5] Moore, S. B., Manring, S. L. Strategy development in small and medium sized enterprises for sustainability and increased value creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2009, 17(2), 276-282.

      [6] Aydın, E., & Savrul, B. K. The relationship between globalization and e-commerce: Turkish case. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, 150, 1267-1276.

      [7] Miyazaki, A. D., & Fernandez, A. Consumer perceptions of privacy and security risks for online shopping. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 2001, 35(1), 27-44.

      [8] Muthaiyah, S., Ernest, J. A. J., & Wai, C. K. Review of e-commerce issues: Consumers' perception on security and privacy. International Business and Economics Research Journal, 2004, 3, 69-78.

      [9] Smith, R., & Shao, J. Privacy and e-commerce: a consumer-centric perspective. Electronic Commerce Research, 2007, 7(2), 89-116.

      [10] Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. Characteristics of innovation and innovation adoption in public organizations: Assessing the role of managers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2009, 19(3), 495-522.

      [11] Hulland, J., Wade, M., & Antia, K. The impact of capabilities and prior investments on online channel commitment and performance. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2007, 23(4), 109-142.

      [12] Gatha, K., Durai, R. & Vincent, P. M. The measurement and validation of trust in e-commerce relationships. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 2013, 3(4), 778-782.

      [13] Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 1989, (35)8, 982-1002.

      [14] Ajzen, I. From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Huhl, & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action Control. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1985, pp. 11–39.

      [15] Davis, F. D. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985.

      [16] Polger J, & Adamson G. New generation of portal software and engineering: Emerging technologies. IGI Publishing, 2011.

      [17] Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 2000, 46(2), 186-204.

      [18] Bugembe, J. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude and actual usage of a new financial management system: A case study of Uganda National Examinations Board Makerere University Business School. 2003 http://www.mubs.ac.ug/docs/masters/acc_fin/Perceived%20usefulness.pdf.

      [19] Keil, M., Beranek, P. M., & Konsynski, B. R. Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations. Decision Support Systems, 1995, 13(1), 75-91.

      [20] Ma, Q., & Liu, L. The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 2004, 16(1), 59-72.

      [21] Kim, M. J., Chung, N., & Lee, C. K. The effect of perceived trust on electronic commerce: Shopping online for tourism products and services in South Korea. Tourism Management, 2011, 32(2), 256-265.

      [22] Bacharach, M., & Gambetta, D. Trust as type detection. In C. C. Franchi, & Y. H. Tan (Eds.), Trust and Deception in Virtual Societies. Dordrecht: Springer, 2001, pp. 1-26.

      [23] Giddens, A. The consequences of modernity. Polity Press, 1990.

      [24] Paweł, K., & Urszula, Ś. No trust, no transaction–the implications for the internet suppliers. Proceedings of the International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology, 2006, pp. 303-309.

      [25] Gustavsson, M., & Johansson, A. M. (2006). Consumer Trust in E-commerce. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:230712/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

      [26] Thompson, S. H., & Teo, J. L. Consumer trust in e-commerce in the United States, Singapore and China. Omega, 35(1), 22-38.

      [27] Loukas, G., & Oke, G. Protection against denial of service attacks: A survey. Computer. Journal, 2010, 53(7), 1020–1037.

      [28] Xu, H., & Teo, H. H. Alleviating consumers' privacy concerns in location-based services: A psychological control perspective. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 793-806.

      [29] Bharat, B. Electronic Commerce: Framework, technologies and applications. McGraw Hill, 2013.

      [30] Eastlick, M., & Lotz, S. Cognitive and institutional predictors of initial trust toward an online retailer. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 2011, 39, 234-255.

      [31] Mustafa, I. E. Determinants of e-commerce customer satisfaction, trust, and loyalty in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 2011, 12(1), 78- 93.

      [32] Hartman, B., Flinn, D. J. Beznosov, K., & Kawamoto, S. Mastering web service security. Wiley, 2003.

      [33] Rong-Ruey, D., Karim, J., & Shyam, S. 2002. Control and Assurance in e-Commerce: Privacy, Integrity, and Security at e-Bay. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f644/eda94df6cda2dcc4e4fb0bc80353769cbd36.pdf.

      [34] Suki, N. M., & Suki, N. M. Exploring the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived enjoyment, attitude and subscribers’ intention towards using 3G mobile services. Journal of Information Technology Management, 2011, 22(1), 1-7.

      [35] Bruner II, G. C., & Kumar, A. Explaining consumer acceptance of handheld Internet devices. Journal of Business Research, 2005, 58(5), 553-558.

      [36] Dabholkar P. A., Bagozzi R. P. An attitudinal model of technology-based self-service: moderating effects of consumer traits and situational factors. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2002, 30(3), 184-201.

      [37] Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 2003, 59(4), 451-474.

      [38] Carle, A. C., Jaffee, D., Vaughan, N. W., & Eder, D. Psychometric properties of three new national survey of student engagement-based engagement scales: An item response theory analysis. Research in Higher Education, 2009, 50(8), 775-794.

      [39] Randall, D. M., & Gibson, A. M. Methodology in business ethics research: A review and critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics, 1990, 9(6), 457-471.

      [40] Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. Editorial-partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 2013, 46(1-2), 1-12.

      [41] Nunnally, J. C. Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1978.

      [42] Grandzol, J. R., & Gershon, M. Which TQM practices really matter: an empirical investigation. Quality Management Journal, 1998, 5(3), 43-59.

      [43] Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of Marketing Science, 1988, 16(1): 74-94.

      [44] Cunningham, E. A practical guide to structural equation modelling using Amos. Statsline, 2008.

      [45] Albashir, W. A., Zainuddin, Y., & Panigrahi, S. K. The acceptance of Islamic banking products in libya: a theory of planned behavior approach. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 2018, 8(3), 105-111.

      [46] Smith, R., & Shao, J. Privacy and e-commerce: A consumer-centric perspective. Electronic Commerce Research, 2007, 7(2), 89-116.

      [47] Lee, D., Park, J., & Ahn, J. H. On the explanation of factors affecting e-commerce adoption. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dongwon_Lee2/publication/221599387_On_the_Explanation_of_Factors_Affecting_E-Commerce_Adoption/links/55e4288b08aede0b5733e119/On-the-Explanation-of-Factors-Affecting-E-Commerce-Adoption.pdf.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    F.H.O, H., M.S, M., & S, K. (2018). Trustworthy E-Commerce Model for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs). International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.15), 135-140. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.15.21435

    Received date: 2018-10-09

    Accepted date: 2018-10-09

    Published date: 2018-10-07