Online Discussion Strategies to Facilitate Undergraduate Students’ Discussion in a Technical University

  • Authors

    • Azura Omar
    • Zaini Amir
    • Maslawati Mohamad
    2018-11-26
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.21.21621
  • Case Study, Engineering Undergraduate Students, Online Discussion Strategies, Project Work, Technical University

  • Abstract

    The use of online discussion forum is slowly integrated into classroom teaching and learning as studies have proven that it contributes to positive learning environment. In order to know how to use the online discussion forum effectively, this study was conducted. The research objective was to identify the online discussion strategies employed by the participants.  This case study involved fifteen second semester Engineering Technology Malaysian undergraduates. Data were gathered from a focus group interview, individual interview and participants’ reflective notes. Five participants volunteered to be interviewed individually and the remainder were interviewed in a focus group interview. The participants were interviewed immediately after their online discussion activities. The participants were also asked to reflect on their opinions regarding their online discussion experience after each online discussion activities. These findings indicate that participants employed three online discussion strategies to facilitate their project work, namely: 1) outlining and organising ideas before posting 2) understanding others’ responses before posting their ideas online, and 3) reconfirming their own statements before posting.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Islam N, Beer M, Slack F. E-learning challenges faced by academics in higher education. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2015;3(5):102-12.

      [2] Hamdan NA, Mohamad M, Shaharuddin S. Hypermedia Reading Materials: Undergraduate Perceptions and Features Affecting Their Reading Comprehension. Electronic Journal of e-Learning. 2017;15(2):116-25.

      [3] Stanford P, Crowe MW, Flice H. Differentiating with technology. TEACHING exceptional children plus. 2010 Apr;6(4):n4.

      [4] Musa F, Mohamed M, Mufti N, Latiff RA, Amin MM. Incorporating computer-mediated communication in project work. International Education Studies. 2015 Apr 28;8(5):150

      [5] Rajprasit K, Hemchua S. The English language & communication in the international workplace: an examination of thai computer engineering professionals. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®. 2015 Sep 22;21(3).

      [6] Mohamad, M, Mokhtar, M, Yahaya, MF, Rawian, RM. Emotional Intellegence. In Abdul Majid, F., Md Zamin, A. A. & Kamarudin, M. F. (Eds.). Toolkits for 21st century teaching: Practical implications for the 4th Industry Skills Development. Shah Alam UITM Press 2017: 67-78

      [7] Wang PA. Assessment of asynchronous online discussions for a constructive online learning community. International Journal of Information and Education Technology. 2015 Aug 1;5(8):598.

      [8] Clark T. Disadvantages of collaborative online discussion and the advantages of sociability, fun and cliques for online learning. In Proceedings of the 3.1 and 3.3 working groups conference on International federation for information processing: ICT and the teacher of the future-Volume 23 2003 Jan 1 (pp. 23-25). Australian Computer Society, Inc.

      [9] An H, Shin S, Lim K. The effects of different instructor facilitation approaches on students’ interactions during asynchronous online discussions. Computers & Education. 2009 Nov 1;53(3):749-60.

      [10] Wang Q, Woo HL. Comparing asynchronous online discussions and faceâ€toâ€face discussions in a classroom setting. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2007 Mar;38(2):272-86.

      [11] Vonderwell S, Liang X, Alderman K. Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2007 Mar 1;39(3):309-28.

      [12] Xia JC, Fielder J, Siragusa L. Achieving better peer interaction in online discussion forums: A reflective practitioner case study. Issues in Educational Research. 2013;23(1):97-113.

      [13] Mahbib UK, Esa A, Mohamad NH, Mohd Salleh B. Cooperative Learning (CL) as 21 st Century's Teaching Method in Improving English Proficiency among Primary School Student: Teacher's Perception. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities. 2017 Apr 2.

      [14] Harasim, L. (2014). Learning theory and online technologies. The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. 29.

      [15] Sawhney M, Prandelli E. Communities of creation: managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets. California management review. 2000 Jul;42(4):24-54.

      [16] Kulikovskikh IM, Prokhorov SA, Suchkova SA. Promoting collaborative learning through regulation of guessing in clickers. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017 Oct 1;75:81-91.

      [17] Weinberger A, Stegmann K, Fischer F. Knowledge convergence in collaborative learning: Concepts and assessment. Learning and Instruction. 2007 Aug 1;17(4):416-26.

      [18] Gao F, Wang CX, Sun Y. New Model of Productive Online Discussion and Its Implications for Research and Instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange. 2009;2(1):65.

      [19] Slavin RE. Synthesis of Research on Cooperative Learning. Educational leadership. 1981 May;38(8):655-660.

      [20] Yang YF, Lin YY. Online collaborative note-taking strategies to foster EFL beginners' literacy development. System. 2015 Aug 1;52:127-38.

      [21] Webb, NM, Mastergeorge A. Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research. 2003 Jan 1;39(1-2):73-97.

      [22] Al-Shalchi, ON. The effectiveness and development of online discussions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2009 Mar 1;5(1):104-8.

      [23] Dogruer N, Eyyam R, Menevis I. The use of the internet for educational purposes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011 Jan 1;28:606-11.

      [24] Richardson, J. C. & Swan, K. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network. 7(1): 2003 68–88.

      [25] Hewitt J. Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. The journal of the learning sciences. 2005 Oct 1;14(4):567-89.

      [26] Xia, JC, Fielder J, Siragusa L. Achieving better peer interaction in online discussion forums: A reflective practitioner case study. Issues in Educational Research. 2013;23(1):97-113.

      [27] Arend, B. Encouraging critical thinking in online threaded discussions. Journal of Educators Online. 2009 Jan;6(1):n1.

      [28] Shana Z. Learning with technology: Using discussion forums to augment a traditional-style class. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2009 Jul 1;12(3):214.

      [29] Stake, R. E. Case studies. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2005.

      [30] Hox, JJ, Boeije, H. R. Data collection, primary vs. secondary. Encyclopedia of Social Measurement, 2005: 593-599.

      [31] Stenbacka C. Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own. Management decision. 2001 Sep 1;39(7):551-6.

      [32] Patton, MQ. Cochran, M. A guide to using qualitative research methodology. Medecins Sans Frontieres 2002: 11–13.

      [33] Bashir M, Afzal MT, Azeem M. Reliability and validity of qualitative and operational research paradigm. Pakistan journal of statistics and operation research. 2008 Jan 1;4(1):35-45.

      [34] Golafshani N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report. 2003;8(4):597-606.

      [35] Creswell JW. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2012.

      [36] Crow, G, Wiles, R. Managing anonymity and confidentiality in social research: the case of visual data in Community research. Economic & Social Research Council . 2008; 8(8):1–14.

      [37] Robert, E. S. Synthesis of Research on Cooperative Learning. Wadsworth 1991: 71–82.

      [38] Yuit CM, Thai YN. Encouraging participation in public discourse through online writing in ESL instruction. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®. 2010;16(2).

      [39] Krish P. The power of feedback in an online learning environment. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®. 2006;12.

      [40] Shahsavar Z, Hoon TB. Does Cognitive Style Affect Bloggers’ Attitude In An Online Learning Environment?. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies. 2011 Jan 1;11(1).

      [41] Dyrli OE, Kinnaman DE. Gaining the Online Edge. Part 2: Energizing the Classroom Curriculum through Telecommunications. Technology & Learning. 1996;16(4):65-70.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Omar, A., Amir, Z., & Mohamad, M. (2018). Online Discussion Strategies to Facilitate Undergraduate Students’ Discussion in a Technical University. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.21), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.21.21621

    Received date: 2018-11-26

    Accepted date: 2018-11-26

    Published date: 2018-11-26