The Influence of Air-Fuel Equivalence Ratio on the Perfor-mance and Emission Characteristics of a Crank-rocker Engine

 
 
 
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract


    This paper investigates the effect of air-fuel equivalence ratio on the crank-rocker engine performance and emission. The engine is a four-stroke single curved-cylinder spark ignition gasoline engine. The experiment was conducted at different equivalence ratios of 0.7, 0.96, 1.15, and 1.21 with each one operating at 50% throttle. The entire tests were carried out at an engine speed of 2000 rpm and 6.5° CA BTDC ignition timing. The performance data such as brake torque, brake power, brake specific fuel consumption, and brake thermal efficiency were calculated. The engine exhaust gas emission such as CO, CO2, HC, and NOx have also been measured. The results showed that the maximum values for the brake torque and power occurred when air-fuel equivalence ratio was equal to 0.91. While the minimum brake specific fuel consumption occurred when the equivalence ratio was equal to 1.15; which is the point of the maximum brake thermal efficiency. From the experimental results, it was found that the concentration of CO and HC emissions decreased while CO2 and NOx emissions increased with the increase in air-fuel equivalence ratio. To conclude, the crank-rocker engine may become an alternative to the conventional engine in the future but further research work will be required. 


  • References


      [1] Aina, T.O. P. E. Folayan, C. O. Pam, G.Y,“Influence of compression ratio on the performance characteristics of a spark ignition engine,”Advances in Applied Science Research3, 1915-1922 (2012).

      [2] Kakaee, A. H. &Zareei, J, “Influence of varying timing angle on performance of an SI engine: An experimental and numerical study,”Journal of Computational & Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering 2, 33-43 (2013).

      [3] Rahman, M. Noor, M. Kadirgama, K. &Rejab, M, “Study of air fuel ratio on engine performance of direct injection hydrogen fueled engine,”European Journal of Scientific Research 34, 506-513 (2009).

      [4] Aljamali, S. Mahmood, W. M. F. W. Abdullah, S. & Ali, Y,“Comparison of performance and emission of a gasoline engine fuelled by gasoline and CNG under various throttle positions,”Journal of Applied Sciences 14, 386, 2014 (2014).

      [5] Yousufuddin, S. & Mehdi, S. N, “Effect of ignition timing, equivalence ratio, and compression ratio on the performance and emission characteristics of a variable compression ratio SI engine using ethanol unleaded gasoline blends,”International Journal of Engineering Transactions B: Applications 21, 97-106 (2008).

      [6] Daniel, R. Wang, C. Xu, H. & Tian, G, “Effects of combustion phasing, injection timing, relative air-fuel ratio and variable valve timing on SI engine performance and emissions using 2, 5-dimethylfuran,”SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants 5, 855-866 (2012).

      [7] Kakee, A. H. Sharifipour, S. Mashadi, B. Keshavarz, M. &Paykani, A, “ Optimization of spark timing and air-fuel ratio of an si engine with variable valve timing using genetic algorithm and steepest descend method,”UPB Sci. Bull 77, 61-76 (2015).

      [8] Hagos, F. Y. Aziz, A. R. A. &Sulaiman, S. A, “Effect of Air-fuel Ratio on the Combustion Characteristics of Syngas (H 2: CO) in Direct-injection Spark-ignition Engine,”Energy Procedia 61, 2567-2571 (2014).

      [9] Mustafi, N. Miraglia, Y. Raine, R. Bansal, P. & Elder, S, “Spark-ignition engine performance with ‘Powergas’ fuel (mixture of CO/H 2): a comparison with gasoline and natural gas,”Fuel 85, 1605-1612 (2006).

      [10] Salimi, A. H. and A. M. Pourkhesalian, "Role of mixture richness, spark and valve timing in hydrogen-fuelled engine performance and emission," international journal of hydrogen energy, vol. 34, pp. 3922-3929, 2009.

      [11] Scott, D, “Construction and Operation of the Bradshaw Omega Engine,”Automotive Industries, Jan. 15, 54-55 (1956).

      [12] Wolff, L. J,“Internal combustion engine,”United State Patent 180,9577, (Jun 9 1931).

      [13] Farrell, M, “Oscillating piston engine,”United State Patent 5,222,463, (29Jun 1993).

      [14] Hoose, K. V, “Toroidal internal combustion engine,”United State Patent 20,050,016,493, (27 Jan 2005).

      [15] Morgado, R, “Internal combustion engine and method,”United State Patent 20,070,199,537, (30Aug 2007).

      [16] Hüttlin, H, “Oscillating piston machine,” United State Patent 743,5064, (14 Oct 2008).

      [17] Giurca, L, “Hybrid Opposite Piston Engine - HOPE & Portable Range Extender,”Powertrain Technologies (2013).

      [18] Taurozzi, E, “Balanced modular pendulum mechanism,”United State Patent 638,2143, (3 May 2002).

      [19] Evans, R. L, “Automotive engine alternatives,” First Edition. New York: Springer Science & Business Media (2013).


 

View

Download

Article ID: 21926
 
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i3.17.21926




Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.