Dynamic Stress Analysis of Skin (Bovine) and Synthetic Skin (Silicone) under Low Impact Loading : a Review and Framework

  • Authors

    • Zurri Adam Mohd Adnan
    • Jamaluddin Mahmud
    • Mohd Azman Yahaya
    2018-11-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.26.22163
  • Skin, synthetic skin, hyperelastic, dynamic stress, low impact loading

  • Abstract

    Skin performs multiple important functions for our body and that might be the main reason for it complex structure and unique mechanical behaviour. There have been a lot of studies about skin mechanical behaviour but skin deformation behaviour and its dynamic stress under low impact loading is still not well understood. This paper aims to review past research related to skin investigation, which ultimately leads to proposing a research framework in determining the dynamic stress of skin and synthetic skin under low impact loading. In the first stage, the literatures related to skin substitutes and skin hyperelastic properties were reviewed, summarised and reported. The past research related to numerical analysis using hyperelastic constitutive models such as Neo-Hookean, Mooney-Rivlin and Ogden model to quantify skin mechanical behaviour were discussed. Next, the literatures related to determining dynamic stress as well as the specimen specification were reviewed and reported. Finally, based on these reviews, a research framework to determine the dynamic stress of skin and synthetic skin under low impact loading is proposed. The information provided in this paper could contribute significant fundamental knowledge about skin behaviour and the preparation to perform experiments in understanding the dynamic stress of skin under low impact loading.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Alrubaiy L and Al-Rubaiy K. K (2009), “Skin Substitutes: A Brief Review of Types and Clinical Applications,†Oman Med. J., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 6–8.

      [2] Annaidh AN, Bruyère K, Destrade M, Gilchrist M D, and Otténio M (2012), “Characterization of the anisotropic mechanical properties of excised human skin,†Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 139–148.

      [3] Benítez JM and Montáns FJ (2017), “The mechanical behavior of skin: Structures and models for the finite element analysis,†Comput. Struct., vol. 190, pp. 75–107.

      [4] Foley E, Robinson A, and Maloney M (2013), “Skin Substitutes and Dermatology: A Review,†Current Dermatology Reports, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 101–112.

      [5] Gallagher, A. J.; NiÌ Annaidh, Aisling; BruyeÌ€re (2012), “Dynamic Tensile Properties of Human Skin,†IRCOBI Conference

      [6] Mohd Noor SNA and Mahmud J (2014), “A Review on Synthetic Skin: Materials Investigation, Experimentation and Simulation,†Advanced Materials Research, vol. 915–916, pp. 858–866.

      [7] Pramudita JA, Shimizu Y, Tanabe Y, Ito M, and Watanabe R (2013), “Anisotropic Tensile Properties of Porcine Skin in Dorsal and Ventral Regions,†Journal of JSEM, vol. 14, no. July, pp. 3–6.

      [8] Ottenio M, Tran D, Annaidh AN, Gilchrist MD, and Bruyère K (2015), “Strain rate and anisotropy effects on the tensile failure characteristics of human skin,†Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 41, pp. 241–250.

      [9] Moerman KM, Simms CK, and Nagel T (2016), “Control of tension-compression asymmetry in Ogden hyperelasticity with application to soft tissue modelling,†Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 56, pp. 218–228.

      [10] Yilmazçoban NK and Yilmazçoban İK (2016), “Experimental and Computational Examination of the Bovine and Chicken Skins under Tensile Loading,†International Journal of Biological and Medical Science, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 16–20.

      [11] Remache D, Caliez M, Gratton M, and Santos SD (2018), “The effects of cyclic tensile and stress-relaxation tests on porcine skin,†Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, vol. 77, no. August 2017, pp. 242–249.

      [12] Mathew SAN, Nicholas N, Jeschke MG (2016), “Methodologies in Creating Skin Substitutes,†Cell Mol Life Sci, vol. 73, no. 18, pp. 3453–3472.

      [13] Halim A, Khoo T, and Shah JY (2010), “Biologic and synthetic skin substitutes: An overview,†Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, vol. 43, no. 3, p. 23.

      [14] Azmi NN, Ab Patar MNA, Mohd Noor SNA, and Mahmud J (2014), “Testing standards assessment for silicone rubber,†ISTMET 2014 - 1st Int. Symp. Technol. Manag. Emerg. Technol. Proc., vol. 3, no. 600, pp. 332–336.

      [15] Horch RE, Kopp J, Kneser U, Beier J, and Bach AD (2005), “Tissue engineering of cultured skin substitutes.,†J. Cell. Mol. Med., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 592–608.

      [16] Shergold OA, Fleck NA, and Radford D (2006), “The uniaxial stress versus strain response of pig skin and silicone rubber at low and high strain rates,†Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 1384–1402.

      [17] Wang Y, Marshall KL, Baba Y, Gerling GJ, and Lumpkin EA (2013), “Hyperelastic Material Properties of Mouse Skin under Compression,†PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6.

      [18] Lim J, Hong J, Chen WW, and Weerasooriya T (2011), “Mechanical response of pig skin under dynamic tensile loading,†Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 38, no. 2–3, pp. 130–135.

      [19] Manan NFA, Mahmud J, and Ismail MH (2013), “Quantifying the Biomechanical Properties of Bovine Skin under Uniaxial Tension,†J. Med. Bioeng., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 45–48.

      [20] Kim B et al(2012), “A comparison among Neo-Hookean model, Mooney-Rivlin model, and Ogden model for Chloroprene rubber,†International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 759–764, 2012.

      [21] Lateefi MM, Kumar D, and Sarangi S (2015), “A comparison of different material models for Elastomeric material under deformation,†Indian Conference on Applied Mechanics (INCAM), no. July, pp. 13–15.

      [22] Mohotti D, Ali M, Ngo T, Lu J, and Mendis P (2013), “Strain rate dependent constitutive model for predicting the material behaviour of polyurea under high strain rate tensile loading,†Materials & Design, vol. 53, pp. 830–837.

      [23] Faghihi S., Karimi A, Jamadi M, Imani R, and Salarian R (2014), “Graphene oxide / poly ( acrylic acid )/ gelatin nanocomposite hydrogel : Experimental and numerical validation of hyperelastic model,†Materials Science & Engineering C, vol. 38, pp. 299–305, 2014.

      [24] Montella G, Calabrese A, and Serino G (2014), “Mechanical characterization of a Tire Derived Material: Experiments, hyperelastic modeling and numerical validation,†Construction and Building Materials, vol. 66, pp. 336–347.

      [25] Karimi A, Rahmati SM, and Navidbakhsh M (2015), “Mechanical characterization of the rat and mice skin tissues using histostructural and uniaxial data,†Bioengineered, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 153–160.

      [26] Khajehsaeid H, Arghavani J, and Naghdabadi RB (2013), “A hyperelastic constitutive model for rubber-like materials,†Eur. J. Mech. A/Solids, vol. 38, pp. 144–151.

      [27] Shevchenko RV, James SL, and James SE (2010), “A review of tissue-engineered skin bioconstructs available for skin reconstruction,†J. R. Soc. Interface, vol. 7, no. 43, pp. 229–258.

      [28] Jakel R (2010),"Analysis Of Hyperelastic Materials With Mechanica-Theory And Application Examples", in 2nd Simulation Meeting SAXSIM (SAXon SImulation Meeting), T. U. Chemnitz, Ed., ed,.

      [29] de Sousa Crespoa J (2009), "Human Tissue Hyperelastic Analysis," Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade Tecnica de Lisboa.

      [30] Yusop M et al (2014), “A Parametric Investigation on the Neo-Hookean Material Constant,†Adv. Mater. Res., vol. 915, pp. 853–857.

      [31] Chen Z, Scheffer T, Seibert H, and Diebels S (2013), “Macroindentation of a soft polymer: Identification of hyperelasticity and validation by uni/biaxial tensile tests,†Mech. Mater., vol. 64, pp. 111–127.

      [32] Sen O (2010), “Analysis of the Study of Material Behaviour at Impact Strain,†Michigan State University.

      [33] Zheng Z, Wang C, Yu J, Reid SR, and Harrigan JJ (2014), “Dynamic stress-strain states for metal foams using a 3D cellular model,†J. Mech. Phys. Solids, vol. 72, pp. 93–114.

      [34] Vishwas M, Joladarashi S, and Kulkarni S (2018), “Modelling and Analysis of Material Behaviour under Normal and Oblique Low Velocity Impact,†Mater. Today Proc., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 6635–6644.

      [35] N. William and J. Sharpe (2008), Springer Handbook of Experimental Solid Mechanics.

      [36] Xie Q, Zhu Z, and Kang G (2014), “Dynamic stress-strain behavior of frozen soil: Experiments and modeling,†Cold Regions Science and Technology, vol. 106–107, pp. 153–160.

      [37] Xia K and Yao W (2015), “Dynamic rock tests using split Hopkinson (Kolsky) bar system - A review,†Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 27–59.

      [38] Dai F, Huang S, Xia K, and Tan Z (2010), “Some fundamental issues in dynamic compression and tension tests of rocks using split Hopkinson pressure bar,†Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 657–666.

      [39] Meo M, Vignjevic R, and Marengo G (2005), “The response of honeycomb sandwich panels under low-velocity impact loading,†International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 47, no. 9, pp. 1301–1325.

      [40] Song B and Chen W (2004), “Dynamic stress equilibration in split Hopkinson pressure bar tests on soft materials,†Exp. Mech., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 300–312.

      [41] Guo H, Guo W, and Amirkhizi AV (2017), “Constitutive modeling of the tensile and compressive deformation behavior of polyurea over a wide range of strain rates,†Construction and Building Materials, vol. 150, pp. 851–859.

      [42] Miao YG. et al (2016), “Determination of dynamic elastic modulus of polymeric materials using vertical split Hopkinson pressure bar,†Int. J. Mech. Sci., vol. 108–109, pp. 188–196.

      [43] Ramezani M and Ripin ZM (2010), “Combined experimental and numerical analysis of bulge test at high strain rates using split Hopkinson pressure bar apparatus,†J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 210, no. 8, pp. 1061–1069.

      [44] Sligtenhorst CV, Cronin DS, and Brodland GW (2006), “High strain rate compressive properties of bovine muscle tissue determined using a split Hopkinson bar apparatus,†J. Biomech., vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1852–1858.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Adam Mohd Adnan, Z., Mahmud, J., & Azman Yahaya, M. (2018). Dynamic Stress Analysis of Skin (Bovine) and Synthetic Skin (Silicone) under Low Impact Loading : a Review and Framework. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.26), 180-184. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.26.22163

    Received date: 2018-11-29

    Accepted date: 2018-11-29

    Published date: 2018-11-30