Determination of CCT Due to Interconnected link Tripping using the OMIB and EAC

  • Authors

    • Nur Ashida Salim
    • Jasronita Jasni
    • Norfishah Ab Wahab
    • Nur Fadilah Ab Aziz
    • Nur Azzammudin Rahmat3 Zuhaila Mat Yasin
    • Hasmaini Mohamad
    2018-11-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.22.22187
  • critical clearing time, critical clearing angle, equal area criterion, dynamic system sequence of fault, transient stability assessment, one machine infinite bus.

  • Abstract

    This paper presents an algorithm to determine the critical clearing time (CCT) due to the effect of interconnected link tripping by applying the one machine infinite bus (OMIB) equivalent system method and equal area criterion (EAC). This paper also proposes the implementation of graphical user interface (GUI) to monitor and predict the CCT from time to time. The CCT is defined as the highest time interval by which the fault is expected to be cleared with the aim of maintaining the electricity supply stability. The computation of important numerical development of CCT is deduced from the entails three fault situations, which are; pre-fault, during fault and post-fault situations, with the main focus on pre-fault situation. The CCT becomes significantly shorter whilst transient instability is induced by a three-phase fault occurred at the bus bar next to the substation connected with a sensitive generator. It is sufficient to maintain the transient stability albeit fault occurred at other locations by setting the protection relay with the computed value of CCT. A circuit breaker which is installed and operated before the smallest CCT will not affect the transient instability throughout the occasion of fault. The IEEE Reliability Test System 1979 (IEEE RTS-79) is used to verify the accuracy of the proposed methodology in determining the CCT. 

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] M. Venkatasubramanian and K. Tomsovic, Electricity supply Analysis. WCB/McGraw-Hill, 2005.

      [2] G. R. Walke, “Improving Transient Stability ofElectricity supply by using Distributed Static Series Compensator,†2016.

      [3] N. A. Salim, M. M. Othman, M. S. Serwan, and S. Busan, “a Single Machine Equivalent Approach for the Amelioration of CCT Limit,†vol. 10, no. 19, pp. 8972–8979, 2015.

      [4] P. G. Pavella, M. ; Murthy, Transient stability of electricity supplys: Theory and practice. New York, NY (United States); John Wiley and Sons.

      [5] N. A. Salim, M. M. Othman, I. Musirin, and M. S. Serwan, “The Impact of System Sequence of fault and Interconnected link Outages to the Transfer Capability Assessment,†vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 250–253, 2014.

      [6] S. Ayasun, Y. Liang, and C. O. Nwankpa, “A sensitivity approach for computation of the probability density function of CCT and probability of stability in electricity supply transient stability analysis,†Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 176, no. 2, pp. 563–576, 2006.

      [7] H.-D. Chiang, F. F. Wu, and P. P. Varaiya, “Foundations of the potential energy boundary surface method for electricity supply transient stability analysis,†IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 712–728, 1988.

      [8] H. Chiang, F. F. F. F. Wu, P. P. P. Varaiya, H. Chiang, F. F. F. F. Wu, and P. P. P. Varaiya, “A BCU method for direct analysis of electricity supply transient stability,†IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1194–1208, 1994.

      [9] Y. Xue, T. Van Cutsem, and M. Ribbens-Pavella, “Extended EAC justifications, generalizations, applications,†IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 44–52, 1989.

      [10] A. A. Fouad and V. Vittal, Electricity supply transient stability analysis using the transient energy function method. Pearson Education, 1992.

      [11] D. Z. Fang and A. K. David, “A normalized energy function for fast transient stability assessment,†Electr. Power Syst. Res., vol. 69, no. 2–3, pp. 287–293, 2004.

      [12] S. Busan, “Dynamic Available Transfer Capability Calculation Considering Generation Rescheduling,†Master Sci. Electr. Eng. Univ. Teknol. MARA, 2012.

      [13] M. M. Othman, S. Busan, I. Musirin, A. Mohamed, and A. Hussain, “A new algorithm for the available transfer capability determination,†Math. Probl. Eng., vol. 2010, 2010.

      [14] M. Pavella, D. Ernst, and D. Ruiz-Vega, “Transient Stability of Electricity supplys A Unified Approach to Assessment and Control,†Kluwer Acad. Publ., pp. 1–254, 2000.

      [15] D. Layden, Transient Stability Assessment and Preventive Control of Electricity supplys. Library and Archives Canada= Bibliothèque et Archives Canada, 2006.

      [16] R. Zarate-Minano, T. Van Cutsem, F. Milano, and A. J. Conejo, “Securing Transient Stability Using Time-Domain Simulations Within an Optimal Power Flow,†IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 243–253, 2010.

      [17] B. Boussahoua and M. Boudour, “CCT evaluation of electricity supply with UPFC by energetic method,†J. Electr. Syst., vol. 5, no. SUPPL. 1, pp. 85–88, 2009.

      [18] G. Srinivasulu, “Multi- Objective Transmission Expansion Planning for IEEE 24 Bus RTS,†pp. 144–149, 2015.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Ashida Salim, N., Jasni, J., Ab Wahab, N., Fadilah Ab Aziz, N., Azzammudin Rahmat3 Zuhaila Mat Yasin, N., & Mohamad, H. (2018). Determination of CCT Due to Interconnected link Tripping using the OMIB and EAC. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.22), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.22.22187

    Received date: 2018-11-29

    Accepted date: 2018-11-29

    Published date: 2018-11-30