A Systematic Review of Individuals’ Acceptance of IOT-based Technologies

  • Authors

    • Gamal Abdulnaser Alkawsi
    • Nor’ashikin Bte. Ali
    2018-11-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.22342
  • Internet of things, smart meters, acceptance, individuals

  • Abstract

    This paper primarily aims to provide a systematic review of factors influencing the individuals’ acceptance of Internet of things (IoT). There are numerous studies in literature that examine factors affecting technology acceptance.  However, the studies on the review for acceptance of Internet of Things is limited.   This study conducted a review and analysis of 32 articles from academic journals and conference proceedings published about the adoption, acceptance and diffusion of IoT. According to the review outcome, there are increasing numbers of studies that have been conducted in the IoT acceptance among individuals hailing from various points of view, with different factors affecting such viewpoints. Nevertheless, it was also noted that a theoretical, methodological and empirical study has yet to be carried out in the field to determine the factors related to the context of its application. The findings also led the author to recommend more future theoretical, methodological and empirical research to be conducted on the topic.

  • References

    1. [1] ROPER P. Market potential of US$731b in connected living by 2020: Frost & Sullivan. Marketing [Internet]. 2014; Available from: https://www.marketingmag.com.au/news-c/market-potential-of-us731b-in-connected-living-by-2020-frost-sullivan/

      [2] Daniel Castro JN& AM. How Is the Federal Government Using the Internet of Things? [Internet]. Center of Data Innovation ; 2016. Available from: http://www2.datainnovation.org/2016-federal-iot.pdf

      [3] Hoover M. Study: IoT adoption still slow for government agencies [Internet]. INTERNET OF THINGS. Washington Technology; 2016. Available from: https://washingtontechnology.com/articles/2016/07/26/agencies-slow-iot-adoption.aspx

      [4] RedHat. The One-Word Description of the Enterprise Internet-of-Things: Deliberate [Internet]. RED HAT BLOG. RedHat; 2015. Available from: https://www.redhat.com/en/about/blog/one-word-description-enterprise-internet-things-deliberate

      [5] Bussu S. The Internet of Things: the case for public voice . Sciencewise evaluation. UK: Sciencewise; 2014.

      [6] Alkawsi GA, BTE. ALI N, ALGHUSHAMI A. TOWARD UNDERSTANDING INDIVI DUALS ’ ACCEPTANCE OF INTERNET OF THINGS – BASED SERVICES : DEVELOPING AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE.

      [7] Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G. The internet of things: A survey. Comput networks. 2010;54(15):2787–805.

      [8] 8Gubbi J, Buyya R, Marusic S, Palaniswami M. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2013;29(7):1645–60.

      [9] Kranz M, Holleis P, Schmidt A. Embedded interaction: Interacting with the internet of things. IEEE Internet Comput. 2010;14(2):46–53.

      [10] Miorandi D, Sicari S, De Pellegrini F, Chlamtac I. Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks. 2012;10(7):1497–516.

      [11] Tan L, Wang N. Future internet: The internet of things. In: 2010 3rd International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE). IEEE; 2010. p. V5-376-V5-380.

      [12] Brous P, Janssen M. A Systematic Review of Impediments Blocking Internet of Things Adoption by Governments. In: Janssen M, Mäntymäki M, Hidders J, Klievink B, Lamersdorf W, van Loenen B, et al., editors. Open and Big Data Management and Innovation : 14th IFIP WG 611 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2015, Delft, The Netherlands, October 13-15, 2015, Proceedings [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 81–94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25013-7_7

      [13] Riggins FJ, Wamba SF. Research Directions on the Adoption, Usage, and Impact of the Internet of Things through the Use of Big Data Analytics. In: System Sciences (HICSS), 2015 48th Hawaii International Conference on. 2015. p. 1531–40.

      [14] YAN B, XIANG W, SHI P. Analysis of influence factors for adoption of internet of things in agricultural supply chain. Soft Sci. 2013;3:7.

      [15] Okoli C, Schabram K. A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research. Sprouts Work Pap Inf Syst. 2010;10:26.

      [16] Yang H, Tate M. A descriptive literature review and classification of cloud computing research. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2012;31(2):35–60.

      [17] Webster J, Watson RT. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a. MIS Q. 2002;26(2):13–23.

      [18] 18. Williams MD, Dwivedi YK, Lal B, Schwarz A. Contemporary trends and issues in IT adoption and diffusion research. J Inf Technol. 2009;24(1):1–10.

      [19] Warkentin M, Goel S, Menard P. Shared benefits and information privacy: What determines smart meter technology adoption? J Assoc Inf Syst [Internet]. 2017;18(11):758–86. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85037379191&partnerID=40&md5=2fa98d530590dc9a8f6d7483ade6c227

      [20] Hong HGHG. Measurement Framework for the Acceptance of Internet of Things Product. Indian J Sci Technol. 2016;9(46).

      [21] Gao L, Bai X. A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology. Asia Pacific J Mark Logist [Internet]. 2014;26(2):211–31. Available from: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/APJML-06-2013-0061

      [22] Hsu C-L, Lin JC-C. Exploring Factors Affecting the Adoption of Internet of Things Services. J Comput Inf Syst [Internet]. 2016;0(0):1–9. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/08874417.2016.1186524

      [23] Lee W-J, Chong S-S. A dual-factor model to explain the future adoption of smart internet of things service and its implications. Int J Softw Eng its Appl. 2016;10(11).

      [24] Mital M, Chang V, Choudhary P, Pani A, Sun Z. Adoption of cloud based Internet of Things in India: A multiple theory perspective. Int J Inf Manage [Internet]. 2016 Mar; Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0268401216301104

      [25] Al-Momani AM, Mahmoud MA, Sharifuddin M. Modeling the adoption of internet of things services: A conceptual framework. IJAR. 2016;2(5):361–7.

      [26] Hsu C-L, Lin JC-C. An empirical examination of consumer adoption of Internet of Things services: Network externalities and concern for information privacy perspectives. Comput Human Behav. 2016;62:516–27.

      [27] Park E, Cho Y, Han J, Kwon SJ. Comprehensive Approaches to User Acceptance of Internet of Things in a Smart Home Environment. IEEE Internet Things J. 2017;4(6):2342–50.

      [28] Singh G, Gaur L, Ramakrishnan R. Internet of things – technology adoption model in India. Pertanika J Sci Technol [Internet]. 2017;25(3):835–46. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85021067105&partnerID=40&md5=adb5bf3137475bcc9a9a1f51e9b85233

      [29] Karahoca A, Karahoca D, Aksöz M. Examining intention to adopt to internet of things in healthcare technology products [Internet]. Kybernetes. 2017. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85037349187&doi=10.1108%2FK-02-2017-0045&partnerID=40&md5=ce41079b9833d8723f64f10662521bfe

      [30] Leong GW, Ping TA, Muthuveloo R. Antecedents of Behavioural Intention to Adopt Internet of Things in the Context of Smart City in Malaysia. Glob Bus Manag Res. 2017;9.

      [31] M. Saeidi, A. Houshang DTV. ASSESSING OF THE EFFECTIVE FACTORS IN THE ACCEPTANCE OF INTERNET OF THINGS TECHNOLOGY IN SMART BUILDINGS (CASE STUDY: CUSTOMER OF ACTIVE COMPANIES IN SMART BUILDINGS IN TEHRAN). J Fundam Appl Sci [Internet]. 2017 Feb;22(1):3. Available from: https://sci-hub.tw/http://jfas.info/index.php/jfas/article/view/2720

      [32] Shin D, Hwang Y. Integrated acceptance and sustainability evaluation of Internet of Medical Things: A dual-level analysis. Internet Res. 2017;27(5):1227–54.

      [33] Chou J-S, Gusti Ayu Novi Yutami I. Smart meter adoption and deployment strategy for residential buildings in Indonesia. Appl Energy. 2014;128:336–49.

      [34] Chen C, Xu X, Arpan L. Between the technology acceptance model and sustainable energy technology acceptance model: Investigating smart meter acceptance in the United States. Energy Res Soc Sci [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Mar 26];25:93–104. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleListURL&_method=list&_ArticleListID=-1254965192&_sort=r&_st=5&md5=6523aed5a11df352b10077a992fd6075&searchtype=a

      [35] Chen K-Y, Yeh C-F. Factors affecting adoption of smart meters in the post-Fukushima era in Taiwan: an extended protection motivation theory perspective. Behav Inf Technol [Internet]. 2017 Sep 2;36(9):955–69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2017.1317363

      [36] Coughlan T, Brown M, Mortier R, Houghton RJJ, Goulden M, Lawson G. Exploring Acceptance and Consequences of the Internet of Things in the Home. In: Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom), 2012 IEEE International Conference on. 2012. p. 148–55.

      [37] Fan Y. From Innovators to Power Users: The Role Of Power Usage in Driving Adoption Of the Internet Of Things (IoT). 2016;

      [38] Attié E, Meyer-Waarden L. A theoretical model incorporating social influence and cognitive processes to explain the adoption of the internet of things and smart connected objects [Internet]. 2016. Available from: http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01406423

      [39] Luthra S, Garg D, Mangla SK, Singh Berwal YP. Analyzing challenges to Internet of Things (IoT) adoption and diffusion: An Indian context. Procedia Comput Sci. 2018;125:733–9.

      [40] Luqman A, Belle JP Van. Analysis of human factors to the adoption of Internet of Things-based services in informal settlements in Cape Town. In: 2017 1st International Conference on Next Generation Computing Applications (NextComp). 2017. p. 61–7.

      [41] Patil K. Retail adoption of Internet of Things: Applying TAM model. In: 2016 International Conference on Computing, Analytics and Security Trends (CAST). 2016. p. 404–9.

      [42] Zhai Y, Liu Y, Zhou T, Shen P. Identification of key factors in health service adoption based on Internet of things and empirical test. In: 2017 29th Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC). 2017. p. 7257–62.

      [43] Westerlund M, Rajala R, Kavandi H, Rajahonka M, Leminen S. Supply chain reactions to the rise of the internet of things: Reseller adoption of smart microgrid solutions. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Business (ICEB). 2015.

      [44] Saenphon T. An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university student’s awareness to using internet of things. In: ACM International Conference Proceeding Series [Internet]. 2017. p. 61–4. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85028768732&doi=10.1145%2F3108421.3108432&partnerID=40&md5=6921b9430fcec4d5dda97dee082333a7

      [45] Alabdulkarim A, Lukszo Z, Fens TW. Acceptance of ICT -Intensive Socio-Technical Infrastructure Systems: Smart metering Case in the Netherlands Layla. 2012;(June):399–404.

      [46] Indrawati, Tohir LM. Predicting smart metering acceptance by residential consumers: An Indonesian perspective. 2016 4th Int Conf Inf Commun Technol ICoICT 2016. 2016;4(c).

      [47] Sim J, Cho D. A Multiyear Study of Smart Meter Adoption: Empirical Evidence from the United Kingdom. In: ICIS 2017: Transforming Society with Digital Innovation [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85041743542&partnerID=40&md5=b0bb0a7f9a3eeeb97001c983bf1cbbc8

      [48] Wunderlich P, Veit D, Sarker S. Examination of the determinants of smart meter adoption: An user perspective. In: International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2012 [Internet]. 2012. p. 1941–57. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84886483376&partnerID=40&md5=963657c86bea11961c3b17ecdc3ea6de

      [49] Kranz J, Gallenkamp J, Picot A. Power control to the people? Private consumers’ acceptance of smart meters. In: 18th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2010 [Internet]. 2010. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84870642506&partnerID=40&md5=78374b5d94389cfe5f06e9a3f024c3e4

      [50] Liew CS, Ang JM, Goh YT, Koh WK, Tan SY, Teh RY. Factors Influencing Consumer Acceptance of Internet of Things Technology. Handb Res Leveraging Consum Psychol Eff Cust Engagem. 2016;186.

      [51] Chou J-S, Yutami GAN. Smart meter adoption and deployment strategy for residential buildings in Indonesia. Appl Energy [Internet]. 2014;128:336–49. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84901202816&doi=10.1016%2Fj.apenergy.2014.04.083&partnerID=40&md5=db3a054a5e2ad8a62ede6b290e6da2d1

      [52] Zhai Y, Liu Y, Zhou T, Shen P. Identification of key factors in health service adoption based on Internet of things and empirical test. In: 2017 29th Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC). 2017. p. 7257–62.

      [53] Hsu C-WC-W, Yeh C-CC-C. Understanding the factors affecting the adoption of the Internet of Things. Technol Anal Strateg Manag [Internet]. 2016;0(0):1–14. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09537325.2016.1269160

      [54] Chen C-F, Xu X, Arpan L. Between the technology acceptance model and sustainable energy technology acceptance model: Investigating smart meter acceptance in the United States. Energy Res Soc Sci [Internet]. 2017;25:93–104. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85009152778&doi=10.1016%2Fj.erss.2016.12.011&partnerID=40&md5=5fc81439cb0864b0cafea139bb3d330d

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Alkawsi, G. A., & Bte. Ali, N. (2018). A Systematic Review of Individuals’ Acceptance of IOT-based Technologies. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.35), 136-142. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.22342

    Received date: 2018-11-29

    Accepted date: 2018-11-29

    Published date: 2018-11-30