Experimental Investigation of MQL Optimum Parameters in End Milling of AA6061-T6 using Taguchi Method

  • Authors

    • W. Safiei
    • M.M. Rahman
    • S.A. Rusdan
    2018-11-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.22360
  • Minimum Quantity Lubricants (MQL), End Milling, Optimum Parameters, Taguchi Method, Aluminum Alloy

  • Abstract

    Minimum Quantity Lubricants is a technique in supplying small quantity of lubricant into machining area which also part of green manufacturing approach that receive wide attention globally. The main driven of introducing MQL method was due to negative environmental impact which leads to safety and health issues of conventional coolant among workers especially in tool and mould industries. Besides, based on research findings, the MQL system has the capability for lubricating and cooling both work piece and cutting tool. In order to find the best solution for machining and also to enhance machining performance, first and foremost the MQL parameters must be controlled wisely as it has remarkable effects on lubricant coverage, droplets size and subsequently influence the machining performance. Nozzle angle, nozzle distance and MQL flow rate are the important parameters studied and surface roughness is the response parameter. Therefore, in this study, MQL optimum parameters were explored by minimizing surface roughness in end milling process using Taguchi L9 orthogonal method. Aluminum Alloy 6061-T6 was selected as work piece material. The results show that the best combination of MQL parameters in minimizing surface roughness was obtained at 30mm nozzle distance, 30 degree nozzle angle and 1.98 mL/min MQL flow rate. Hence, based on this optimal condition, three confirmation runs were conducted. The margin error is acceptable which less than 10% and within prediction interval. This results can work as a base line guidance for any experimental that employ MQL system.

  • References

    1. [1] L. T. Tunc, Y. Gu, and M. G. Burke, “Effects of Minimal Quantity Lubrication (MQL) on Surface Integrity in Robotic Milling of Austenitic Stainless Steel,†in Procedia CIRP, 2016, vol. 45, pp. 215–218.

      [2] B. L. Tai, D. A. Stephenson, R. J. Furness, and A. J. Shih, “Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) in automotive powertrain machining,†in Procedia CIRP, 2014, vol. 14, pp. 523–528.

      [3] T. Aoyama, “Development of a mixture supply system for machining with minimal quantity lubrication,†CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 289–292, 2002.

      [4] M. Rahman, A. Senthil Kumar, and Manzoor-Ul-Salem, “Evaluation of minimal quantities of lubricant in end milling,†Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 235–241, 2001.

      [5] V. Upadhyay, P. K. Jain, and N. K. Mehta, “Machining with minimum quantity lubrication: a step towards green manufacturing,†Int. J. Mach. Mach. Mater., vol. 13, no. 4, p. 349, 2013.

      [6] M. S. Najiha and M. M. Rahman, “Experimental investigation of flank wear in end milling of aluminum alloy with water-based TiO2 nanofluid lubricant in minimum quantity lubrication technique,†Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 86, no. 9–12, pp. 2527–2537, 2016.

      [7] L. N. López De Lacalle, C. Angulo, A. Lamikiz, and J. A. Sánchez, “Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of spray cutting fluids in high speed milling,†Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 172, no. 1. pp. 11–15, 2006.

      [8] E. A. Rahim and H. Dorairaju, “Evaluation of mist flow characteristic and performance in Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) machining,†Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed., vol. 123, pp. 213–225, 2018.

      [9] K. H. Park, J. Olortegui-Yume, M. C. Yoon, and P. Kwon, “A study on droplets and their distribution for minimum quantity lubrication (MQL),†Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 824–833, 2010.

      [10] M. S. Phadke, Quality Engineering using Robust Design. 1989.

      [11] D. P. Selvaraj, “Optimization of cutting force of duplex stainless steel in dry milling operation,†in Materials Today: Proceedings, 2017, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 11141–11147.

      [12] V. N. Gaitonde, S. R. Karnik, and J. P. Davim, “Selection of optimal MQL and cutting conditions for enhancing machinability in turning of brass,†J. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 204, no. 1–3, pp. 459–464, 2008.

      [13] M. S. Najiha and M. M. Rahman, “Experimental study on minimum quantity lubrication in end milling of AA6061-t6 using TiAlN coated carbide tools,†Int. J. Automot. Mech. Eng., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 2771–2785, 2015.

      [14] T.-V. Do and Q.-C. Hsu, “Optimization of Minimum Quantity Lubricant Conditions and Cutting Parameters in Hard Milling of AISI H13 Steel,†Appl. Sci., 2016.

      [15] K. S. Murthy and I. Rajendran, “Optimization of end milling parameters under minimum quantity lubrication using principal component analysis and grey relational analysis,†J. Brazilian Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 2012.

      [16] D. Setti, M. K. Sinha, S. Ghosh, and P. V. Rao, “An Effective Method to Determine the Optimum Parameters for Minimum Quantity Lubrication ( MQL ) Grinding,†no. Aimtdr, pp. 1–6, 2014.

      [17] P. B. Patole and V. V. Kulkarni, “Optimization of Process Parameters based on Surface Roughness and Cutting Force in MQL Turning of AISI 4340 using Nano Fluid,†in Materials Today: Proceedings, 201

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Safiei, W., Rahman, M., & Rusdan, S. (2018). Experimental Investigation of MQL Optimum Parameters in End Milling of AA6061-T6 using Taguchi Method. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.35), 186-189. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.22360

    Received date: 2018-11-29

    Accepted date: 2018-11-29

    Published date: 2018-11-30