Forecasting of Unemployment Rate in Malaysia Using Exponential Smoothing Methods

  • Authors

    • Maria Elena Nor
    • Sabariah Saharan
    • Lok See Lin
    • Rohayu Mohd Salleh
    • Norhaidah Mohd Asrah
    2018-11-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.30.22365
  • Accuracy Measures, Exponential Smoothing, Forecasting, Unemployment Rate

  • Abstract

    One of the issues that triggers worlds lately is the increasing rate of the unemployment rate. Consequently, this research objective is to compare the most accurate forecast method and to find the most suitable period to predict the future of Malaysia’s unemployment rate in 2016. There are five sets of Malaysia’s unemployment rate and three forecasting methods being used which are Naïve, Simple Exponential Smoothing (SES) and Holt’s method. The forecasting model was then selected based on the smallest accuracy measures. The results indicated that Holt’s is the optimal model in forecasting the overall yearly unemployment rate, male yearly unemployment rate and overall quarterly unemployment rate. Furthermore, for female yearly unemployment rate and overall monthly unemployment rate, the best forecasting method was SES. Meanwhile, the overall unemployment rate of Malaysia in year 2016 was predicted to be 2.9% while 3.4% was estimated to be the value of unemployment rate for second half year of 2016 by using quarterly and monthly data. The forecast value was remained the same as previous year for overall yearly male data and female data which were 2.9% and 3.3% respectively. Lastly, the best period in forecasting Malaysia’s overall unemployment rate was found to be month with the value of 3.4%.

  • References

    1. [1] Alhdiy FM, Johari F, Mohd Daud SN & Abdul Rahman A (2015), Short and Long Term Relationship between Economic Growth and Unemployment in Egypt: An Empirical Analysis. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 6(4), pp. 454–462.

      [2] Raphael S, & Winter-Ebmer R (2001), Identifying the Effect of Unemployment on Crime. The Journal of Law & Economics 44(1), pp. 259–283, 2001.

      [3] Kurita T (2010), A Forecasting Model for Japan’s Unemployment Rate.†Eurasian. Journal of Business and Economics 3(5), pp. 127–134.

      [4] Dumi K, Anita ČČ & Žmuk B (2015), Forecasting Unemployment Rate in Selected European Countries Using Smoothing Methods. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 9(4), pp. 1073–1078.

      [5] Nkwatoh L (2012), Forecasting Unemployment Rates in Nigeria Using Univariate time series Models. International Journal of Business and Commerce 1(12), pp. 33–46.

      [6] Floros C (2005), Forecasting The UK Unemployment Rate: Model Comparisons. International Journal of Applied Econometrics and Quantitative Studies 2(4), pp. 57–72.

      [7] Ostertagova E & Ostertag O (2012), Forecasting Using Simple Exponential Smoothing Method. Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica 12(3), pp. 62–66.

      [8] Miller PJ & Chin DM (1996), Using Monthly Data to Improve Quarterly Model Forecasts. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis 20(2), pp. 16-33.

      [9] Hyndman RJ & Athanasopoulos G, Forecasting: Principles and Practice, (2014).

      [10] Holt CC, Forecasting trends and seasonals by exponentially weighted averages, O.N.R. Memorandum 52/1957, Carnegie Institute of Technology, 1957.

      [11] Wilson JH & Keating B, Business Forecasting with Accompanying Excel-Based ForecastX Software. 5th ed., Boston, Mass: McGraw-Hill, (2007).

      [12] Hyndman R J & Koehler AB (2006), Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting 22, pp. 679-688.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Nor, M. E., Saharan, S., Lin, L. S., Salleh, R. M., & Asrah, N. M. (2018). Forecasting of Unemployment Rate in Malaysia Using Exponential Smoothing Methods. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.30), 451-453. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.30.22365

    Received date: 2018-11-29

    Accepted date: 2018-11-29

    Published date: 2018-11-30