Strategies to Improve Probation Students’ Academic Performance in an American Degree Transfer Program (ADP) in Malaysia

  • Authors

    • M. Faizal
    • V. Kalarani
    • P. Sonya
    • A. G. Eshodha
    • A. Amirah
    2018-11-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.28.22556

  • Abstract

    Students with poor academic performance for each academic semester were placed under academic probation program to monitor their progress. In previous studies, poor time management and the tendency to procrastinate were found to be the most significant factors that contributed to the student’s poor academic results. Other factors also include difficulties faced by students to cope with fundamental pre-requisite subject like mathematics. Therefore, this paper will focus on strategies to improve the students’ academic performance so that they will be out of the probation.

  • References

    1. [1] Renzulli SJ. Using learning strategies to improve the academic probation of university students on academic probation. NACADA Journal. 2015;35(1):29-41.

      [2] Wilcox P, Winn S, Fyvie-Gauld M. ‘It was nothing to do with the university, it was just the people’: the role of social support in the first-year experience of higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 2005;30(6):707-22.

      [3] Fauzan MF, Vellasamy K, Prabha S, Gurusamy EA, Alias A. Factors of Students’ Academic Probation in an American Degree Transfer Program (ADP) in Malaysia. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Scientific Research. 2017;2(3):10 - 20.

      [4] Duffy KD. A Mixed Methods Study of Community College Students on Academic Probation: The Limiting Effect of Academic Doublespeak: St. John Fisher College; 2010.

      [5] Harvey-Smith AB. An Examination of the Retention Literature and Application in Student Success2002. Available from: https://www.ccsse.org/center/resources/docs/research/harvey-smith.pdf.

      [6] Hughes MS. Black students’ participation in higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel. 1987:532-55.

      [7] Fleming J. Blacks in College: A Comparative Study of Students' Success in Black and in White Institutions. 1st Edition ed. New York: Jossey-Bass; 1984.

      [8] Nettles M, Theony AR, Gosman EJ. Comparative and predictive analyses of Black and White students’ college achievement and experiences. Journal of Higher Education. 1986;57:289-318.

      [9] Love BJ. Issues and problems in the retention of Black students in predominantly White institutions of higher education. Equity and Excellence in Education. 1993;26:27-33.

      [10] Carroll M. Peer tutoring: can medical students teach biochemistry? Biochemical Education. 1996;24(1):13–5.

      [11] Colvin JW. Peer tutoring and social dynamics in higher education. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. 2007;15(2):165-81.

      [12] Topping KJ. The Effectiveness of Peer Tutoring in Further and Higher Education: A Typology and Review of the Literature. Higher Education. 1996;32(3):321-45.

      [13] Pintrich PR, Garcia T. Individual differences in students’ motivation and self- regulated learning. German Journal of Educational Psychology. 1993;7:99–107.

      [14] Zimmerman BJ. A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology.

      1989;81(3).

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Faizal, M., Kalarani, V., Sonya, P., Eshodha, A. G., & Amirah, A. (2018). Strategies to Improve Probation Students’ Academic Performance in an American Degree Transfer Program (ADP) in Malaysia. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.28), 96-98. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.28.22556

    Received date: 2018-11-30

    Accepted date: 2018-11-30

    Published date: 2018-11-30