The Emotional Meaning behind Typefaces: Developing Typefaces Bank (TB) for Business and Brand Construction
-
2018-11-30 
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.28.22626
-
Typefaces are considered as tiny element yet uncategorized as the primary element in a verbal message. Even though, numerous researches have shown opposite results regarding typefaces. Typefaces are revealed as the element that effects human perception and decision making, especially in business and consumer behavioral circumstances. Typefaces exist as the element that could affect human emotion, the most prominent variable in deciding human behavior. Based on many empirical pieces of evidence, in this study, author gathered approximately 2108 typefaces from three primary sources and evaluated the emotional meaning behind each typeface. Author named these typefaces collection as Typefaces Bank (TB). TB can be valuable for many brand developers and entrepreneurs to construct their brand in public and also deliver impression in business relationships. As an attempt to give emotional meaning to TB, the author applied circumplex model of affect developed by James Russell in 1980, which categorized emotion in two primary aspects, namely valence, and arousal. Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM) is applied to measure valence and arousal degree in each typeface. Result showed that each typeface is categorized in four quadrants produced by the combination between valence and arousal poles.
-
References
[1] Batra, R., & Stayman, D. M. (1990). The role of mood in advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 203-214.
[2] Blumer, H. (2004). George Herbert Mead and Human Conduct. UK: Altamira Press.
[3] Bradley, M. M. (1994). Emotional memory: A dimensional analysis. In S. Van Goozen, N. E Van de Poll, & J.A. Sergeant (Eds.), The emotions: Essay on emotion theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
[4] Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy & Experimental Psychiatry, 25(1), 49-59.
[5] Bradley , M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
[6] Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. USA: Harvard University Press.
[7] Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2009). Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Test and Measurement 7th.ed. McGraw-Hill Companies.
[8] Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
[9] Dodds, P. S., Clark, E. M., Desu, S., Frank, M. R., Reagan, A. J., Williams, J. R., Mitchell, L., Harris, K. D., Kloumann, I. M., Bagrow, J. P., Megerdoomian, K., McMahon, M. T., Tivnan, B. F., & Danforth, C. M. (2015). Human language reveals a universal positivity bias. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(8), 2389-2394.
[10] Doyle, J. R., & Bottomley, P. A. (2004). Font appropriateness and brand choice. Journal of Business Research, 57, 873-880.
[11] Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotion. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3/4), 169-200.
[12] Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering Statistics using R. Sage Publication.
[13] Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2008). Social cognition: from brains to culture. USA: McGraw-Hill International.
[14] Gosling, S. D., Ko, S. J., Mannarelli, T., & Morris, M. E. (2002). A room with a cue: Personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(3), 379-398.
[15] Gump, J. E. (2001). The readability of typefaces and the subsequent mood or emotion created in the reader. Journal of Education for Business, 76(5), 270-273.
[16] Heilman, R. M., Crisan, L. G., Houser, D., Miclea, M., & Miu, A. C. (2010). Emotion regulation and decision making under risk and uncertainty. Emotion, 10(2), 257-265.
[17] Henderson, P. W., Giese, J. L., & Cote, J. A. (2004). Impression management using typeface design. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 60-72.
[18] Kastl, A. J., & Child, I. L. (1968). Emotional meaning of four typographical variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 440-446.
[19] [19] Lang, P. J., & Ohman, A., & Vaitl, D. (1988). The international affective picture system (photographic slides). Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
[20] Morris, J. D., Woo, C., Geason, J. A., & Kim, J. (2002). The power of affect: Predicting intention. Journal of Advertising Research, 42(3), 7-17.
[21] Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161-1178.
[22] Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145-172.
[23] Russell, J. A. (2009). Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1259-1283.
[24] Schiller, G. (1935). An experimental study of the appropriateness of color and type in advertising. Journal of Applied Psychology, 19(6), 652-664.
[25] Surya, A., Tjiaputra, K., & Adinugroho, I. (2016). Iklan yang efektif guna memenangkan persaingan regional: Mempertimbangkan seruan soft-sell dan hard-sell dalam menyusun iklan yang mempengaruhi emosi penonton. Paper presented in Forum Ilmiah Psikologi (FIPI), Universitas Tarumanagara.
[26] Wenas, A., Sjahputri., S., Takwin, B., Primaldhi, A., & Muhamad, R. (2016). Measuring happiness in large population. Paper presented in IOP Conference: Earth and Environmental Science 31. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/31/1/012023
[27] Velasco, C., Woods, A. T., Hyndman, S., & Spence, C. (2015). The taste of typeface. I-perception, 6(4), 1-10.
-
Downloads
-
-
How to Cite
Adinugroho, I. (2018). The Emotional Meaning behind Typefaces: Developing Typefaces Bank (TB) for Business and Brand Construction. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.28), 431-435. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.28.22626
