The Role of Agropolitan Project in Eradicating Poverty: Multidimensional Poverty Index
-
2018-11-30 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.28.22628 -
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to measure the poverty rate of the participants of the Agropolitan Projects by using the Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI).
Methodology: The measurement of MPI used 14 indicators, which covered the dimensions of education, health, living standards, household income, mindset, and environment. This study measured the poverty rate of smallholders within the same area by comparing the poverty levels between the participants and non-participants of this project. This comparison was done as a foundation to expound the effectiveness of Agropolitan Projects in eradicating poverty. The number of samples for the study consisted of 45 participants from the Gahai Agropolitan Project, Lipis and 45 rubber smallholders in Lipis, Pahang, Malaysia.
Results: Â The findings showed that all household members of the participants from the Gahai Agropolitan Project, Lipis were free from multidimensional poverty. The MPI also shows that 2.91% of household members of rubber smallholders in Lipis were categorised as multidimensional poor. This study proved that the Gahai Agropolitan Project was able to eradicate multidimensional poverty among the participants within the project.
Implication: MPI is a comprehensive method in measuring the poverty level, which can help the policymakers to outline an effective poverty eradication programme based on the perspective of multidimensional poverty index.
-
References
[1] Chamhuri, S., Hasan, S. K., & Chamhuri, N. (2005). Ekonomi Malaysia. Pearson Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
[2] Rasiah, R., & Shari, I. (2001). Market, government and Malaysia's new economic policy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25(1), 57-78.
[3] Epu, J. P. M. (2015). Rancangan Malaysia ke-11 (2016-2020). Unit Perancang Ekonomi, Jabatan Perdana Menteri.
[4] Asan A. G. H. (2008). Falsafah Pembangunan dan masalah Demo-sosioekonomi Semasa. Dalam Asan . A. G. H ar (Penyt.). Pembangunan Wilayah dan Alam Sekitar. Penerbit UUM. Sintok. Kedah.
[5] Kementerian Luar Bandar dan Wilayah (KKLW) (2012). Garis Panduan Pengurusan Ladang Sejahtera Projek Agropolitan Di Bawah Program Lonjakan Mega Luar Bandar (PLMLB). Putrajaya.
[6] Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2010). Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries.
[7] Chamhuri, S., Sharudin, I., Nor, D.M., & Zalikha, S. Z. (2014). Poverty Mapping and Characterizing the Poor Using Geographical Information System: Case Study in Terengganu, Malaysia. Prosiding PERKEM ke-9:“Urus Tadbir Ekonomi yang Adil: Ke Arah Ekonomi Berpendapatan Tinggi†Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, 17 – 19 Oktober 2014.
[8] Gorski, P. (2008). The Myth of the``Culture of Poverty''. Educational Leadership, 65(7), 32.
[9] Bradshaw, T. K. (2007). Theories of poverty and anti-poverty programs in community development. Community Development, 38(1), 7-25.
[10] Malek, N. M., & Husin, A. (2016). Pemilikan rumah dalam kalangan masyarakat bandar berpendapatan sederhana dan rendah di Malaysia. SOSIOHUMANIKA, 5(2).
[11] Friedmann, J., & Douglass, M. (1978). Agropolitan development: towards a new strategy for regional planning in Asia. In. F. Lo and K. Salih (Eds). Growth Pole Strategy for Regonal Development Policy. Oxford, England, Pergamon Press. 163-92.
[12] Friedmann, J., & Weaver, C. (1979). Territory and function. London. Edward Arnold.
[13] Hardoy, J. E., & Satterthwaite, D. (1986). Shelter, infrastructure and services in third world cities. Habitat international, 10(3), 245-284.
[14] Douglas, M., (1981). Thailand: Territorial Dissolution and Alternative Regional Development for the Central Plains. In W. Stohr and D.R.F. Taylors (Eds). Planning from Above or Below? pp: 183-208, Chichester: John Wiley.
[15] Buang, A., A. Habibah, J. Hamzah, & Y. S. Ratnawati (2011). "The agropolitan way of re-empowering the rural poor." World Appl. Sci. J 13 (2011): 1-6.
[16] Bhishna Nanda Bajracharya. (1995). Promoting Small Towns for Rural Development : A view from Nepal , Asia Pacific Population J., 10(2) : 27-50.
[17] Zulfa F. I., Syamsul M., Endang G. S., Tajudin B., & Aris M. (2009). Agroindustry Based Agropolitan Institutional Design with Analytical Network Process. Jurnal Teknologi Industri Pertanian 19(3): 130-137.
[18] Hayroll A. M. S., Ahmad F. A. N., Khairuddin I., Jegak U., & Jeffrey L. D. (2010). Agriculture Project as an economic development tool to boost sosio-economic level of poor community: The case of agropolitan project in Malaysia. African Journal of Business Manage., 4(11):2354-2361.
[19] Alkire, S. & Foster, J. (2007). Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measures. Oxford Poverty & Human Development initiative OPHI Working paper 7.
[20] Sen, A. (1981). Issues in the Measurement of Poverty. In Measurement in Public Choice (pp. 144-166). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
[21] Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
[22] Alkire, S. (2008). Choosing dimensions: The capability approach and multidimensional poverty (MPRA Paper No. 8862).
[23] Robeyns, I. (2005). The capability approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of human development, 6(1), 93-117.
[24] Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 27(2), 151-161.
[25] Norzita, Jamil, & Siti Hadijah Che Mat. "Realiti kemiskinan: Satu kajian teoritikal." Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia 48, no. 1 (2014): 167-177.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Ismail, M. K., Siwar, C., Alam, A. S. A. F., Ghazali, R., & Talib, B. A. (2018). The Role of Agropolitan Project in Eradicating Poverty: Multidimensional Poverty Index. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.28), 443-450. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.28.22628Received date: 2018-11-30
Accepted date: 2018-11-30
Published date: 2018-11-30