Energy Security in Malaysia: a Quantitative Analysis

  • Authors

    • Endang Jati Mat Sahid
    2018-11-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.22770
  • Energy security indicator, Energy policy, Malaysia, Security of supply

  • Abstract

    This paper examines the security of energy supply in Malaysia.  Analytical framework was used to quantify and assess the progress of energy security of Malaysia in four different categories namely Availability, Applicability, Affordability and Acceptability of energy resources.  Key metrics include the documentation of energy reserves, energy access, and CO2 emissions from year 2005 to 2015.  Relevant energy security indicators for Malaysia were identified using high quality historical data from World Bank and Energy Commission.

    The evaluation findings show that Malaysia has experienced a significant improvement in Applicability dimension, while Availability and Acceptability aspects of energy security only registered slight improvements.  On the other hand, Affordability dimension has suffered a slight decline.  This study suggests that diversifying energy sources, efficient utilization of energy and reducing carbon content of energy could be enhanced to improve energy security level in Malaysia.

    Energy security indicator; Energy policy; Malaysia, Security of supply

  • References

    1. [1] Blum, H., Legey, L.F.L. (2012). The challenging economics of energy security: Ensuring energy benefits in support to sustainable development. Energy Economics, Vol. 34, pp.1982-1989.

      [2] Yoo, S-H (2006). The causal relationship between electricity consumption and economic growth in the ASEAN countries. Energy Policy, Vol. 34, pp. 3573-3582.

      [3] Reichl, J., Schmidthaler, M. and Schneider, F. (2013). The value of supply security: The costs of power outages to Austrian households, firms and the public sector. Energy Economics, Vol.36, pp. 256-261.

      [4] Manley, D.K., Hines, V.A., Jordan, M.W. and Stoltz, R.E. (2013). A survey of energy policy priorities in the United States: Energy supply security, economics, and the environment. Energy Policy, Vol. 60, pp. 687-696.

      [5] Kanchana, K. and Unesaki, H. (2014). ASEAN Energy Security: An indicator-based assessment. Energy Procedia, Vol.56, pp. 163-171.

      [6] Sovacool, B. (2013). Assessing energy security performance in the Asia Pacific, 1990-2010. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 17, pp. 228-247.

      [7] Sahid, E.J.M., Isa, A.M., Leong, Y.P. and Shi, X. (2013b). Rationale for ASEAN Energy Market Integration (AEMI). In R. Oliver (Eds). ASEAN Energy Market Integration (AEMI): From coordination to integration (pp.45-88). Bangkok: ASEAN Studies Center, Chulalongkorn University.

      [8] Bilgin, M. (2011). Scenarios on European energy security: Outcome of natural gas strategy in 2020. Futures, Vol. 43, pp. 1082-1090.

      [9] Costantini, V., Gracceva, F., Markandya, A. and Vicini, G. (2007). Security of energy supply: Comparing scenarios from a European perspective. Energy Policy, Vol. 35, pp. 210-226.

      [10] Umbach, F. (2010). Global energy security and the implications for the EU. Energy Policy, Vol. 38, pp. 1229-1240.

      [11] Haiges R, Wang YD, Ghoshray A & Roskilly AP (2017), Optimization of Malaysia’s power generation mix to meet the electricity demand by 2050, Energy Procedia 142, 2844-2851

      [12] Matsumoto K & Shiraki H (2018), Energy security performance in Japan under different socioeconomic and energy conditions, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 90, 391-401

      [13] Mansson A, Johannson B & Nilsson LJ (2014), Assessing energy security: An overview of commonly used methodologies, Energy 73, 1-14

      [14] Cherp A& Jewell J(2014), The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As, Energy Policy 75, 415-421

      [15] Sharifuddin S (2014), Methodology for quantitatively assessing the energy security of Malaysia and other southeast Asian countries, Energy Policy 65, 564-582

      [16] Kruyt B, van Vuuren DP, de Vries HJM & Groenenberg H (2009), Indicaators for energy security, Energy Policy 37, 2166-2181

      [17] Tongsopit S, Kittner N, Chang Y, Aksornkij A & Wangjiraniran W (2016), Energy security in ASEAN: A quantitative approach for sustainable energy policy, Energy Policy 90, 60-72

      [18] Yao L& Chang Y(2014), Energy security in China: a quantitative analysis and policy implications, Energy Policy 67, 595-604

      [19] Sovacool BK, Mukkherjee I, Drupady IM& D’Agostino A (2011), Evaluating energy security performance from 1990 to 2010 for eighteen countries, Energy 36, 5846-5853

      [20] Foo KH(2015), A vision on the opportunities, policies and coping strategies for energy security and green energy development in Malaysia, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 51, 1477-1498

      [21] Rodanovic M, Filiponic S. & Pavlovic D(2017), Energy security measurement- A sustainable approach, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 68, 1020-1032

      [22] Winzer C(2012), Conceptualizing energy security, Energy Policy 46, 36-48

      [23] Bekhet H.A. & Sahid E.J.M, Illuminating the policies affecting energy security in Malaysia’s electricity sector, International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 4 (2016), pp:1240-1245

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Sahid, E. J. M. (2018). Energy Security in Malaysia: a Quantitative Analysis. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.35), 400-403. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.35.22770

    Received date: 2018-12-01

    Accepted date: 2018-12-01

    Published date: 2018-11-30