Potential Aircraft Design Improvement and Sustainability Through Feedback Information

  • Authors

    • W M S Wan Husain
    • S Aman Shah
    2018-10-09
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.13.22986

  • Abstract

    Reflecting on previous case studies, events, research data, and experiences have always been crucial in ensuring the betterment of any working procedure and environment – aircraft maintenance industry included. This paper aims to highlight the importance of having feedback information being constantly disseminated in a swift and effective manner, particularly throughout all levels within the aircraft maintenance industry worldwide – which has been acknowledged by Boeing and subsequently, a few distinguished initiatives such as In Service Data Program (ISDP) and Flight Recorder Data Service (FRDS) have been introduced. In terms of fulfilling aircraft technicians’ needs in their current working environments, such initiatives are crucial for more detailed inspections and supervisions to promote the possibility of enhancement and higher revenues in impending project framework. The trends and behaviour of the previous and/or existing products are analysed and the obtained information will assist appropriate decision-making for future improvements. Commonly, some specific types of information will be collected and thoroughly assessed; these information types include failure types, failure modes and frequencies of failure, and/or replacement and maintenance trends. Overall, feedback information is found to be a major contributor to the sustainability of the aircraft industry.

  • References

    1. [1] Rankin W, Hibit R, Allen J & Sargent R (2000), Development and evaluation of the Maintenance Error Decision Aid (MEDA) process. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 26(2), 261-276

      [2] Rankin WL (2000), The Maintenance Error Decision Aid (MEDA) process. XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Association

      [3] Rankin W, Hibit R, Allen J & Sargent R (2000), Development and evaluation of the Maintenance Error Decision Aid (MEDA) process. Int. J. Ind. Ergon 26(2), 261-276

      [4] Rankin WL (2001), User feedback regarding the Maintenance Error Decision Aid (MEDA) process. Joint Meeting of the FSF 54th annual International Air Safety Seminar (IASS)

      [5] Civil Aviation Authority (2008), Civil Aircraft Airworthiness Information and Procedures (CAAIP), CAP 562

      [6] National Space Agency. (2018). Aviation Safety Reporting System. Retrieved from https://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/docs/dbol/ASRS_CodingTaxonomy.pdf

      [7] Bardai A, Er A, Johari MK, & Mohd Noor A (2017). A review of Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) as a competitive South-East Asia hub. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 270, 1-10.

      [8] Boeing Commercial Aviation Services. (September, 2013). Federal Aviation Administration. Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/maintenance_hf/library/documents/media/media/meda_users_guide_updated_09-25-13.pdf

      [9] Khairuddin M, Yahya M, & Johari, MK. (2017). Critical needs for piston engine overhaul centre in Malaysia. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 270, 1-5

      [10] Ya’acob A, Razali D, Anwar U, Radhi A, Ishak A, Minhat M, Mohd Aris KD, Johari MK, & Teh C (2018). Preliminary Study on GF/Carbon/Epoxy Composite Permeability in Designing Close Compartment Processing. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 370, 1-9.

      [11] Civil Aviation Authority (2009), Aircraft Maintenance Incident Analysis, CAA PAPER 2009/05, CAA, UK

      [12] Air Accidents Investigation Branch, The Investigation of Accidents to General Aviation Aircraft 2009

      [13] Johnson CW (2000), Proving properties of accidents. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 67(2), 175-191

      [14] Smart K (2004), Credible investigation of air accidents. Journal of Hazardous Materials 111(1-3), 111-114

      [15] Federal Aviation Authority (FAA) (2007), Element Performance Inspection (EPI) Data Collection Tool, Service Difficulty Reports

      [16] Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (2009), Service Difficulty Reporting (SDR)

      [17] Harkins W (1999), Problem Reporting and Corrective Action Systems, NASA

      [18] Gorinevsky D, Gordon GA, Beard S, Kumar A & Chang FK (2005), Design of Integrated SHM System for Commercial Aircraft Applications

      [19] Pfeiffer H & Wevers M (2007), Aircraft integrated structural health assessment - Structural health monitoring and its implementation within the European Project AISHA

      [20] Air Accidents Investigation Branch. (2018). AAIB. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/air-accidents-investigation-branch/about

      [21] European Aviation Safety Agency. (21 June, 2013). European Aviation Safety Agency. Retrieved from https://www.easa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dfu/certification-memoranda-import-'final'%20EASA%20CM-21A-J-001%20Issue%2001_SBs%20related%20to%20ADs_PUBL.pdf

      [22] Federal Aviation Administration. (2018). Airworthiness Directives (ADs). Retrieved from https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/air_cert/continued_operation/ad/

      [23] Kim, S., Choi, B., Cho, T., Lee, Y., Koo, H., & Kim, D. (2017). Wearable bio signal monitoring system applied to aviation safety. 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (pp. 2349-2352). Jeju Island: IEEE.

      [24] Helwiga, A., Maiera, K., Müller, G., Bley, T., Steffensky, J., & Mannebach, H. (2015). An Optoelectronic Monitoring System for Aviation Hydraulic Fluids. Procedia Engineering, 233-236.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Husain, W. M. S. W., & Shah, S. A. (2018). Potential Aircraft Design Improvement and Sustainability Through Feedback Information. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.13), 221-224. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.13.22986

    Received date: 2018-12-02

    Accepted date: 2018-12-02

    Published date: 2018-10-09