Implementing Fully Privately Run Public Schools: Top View

  • Authors

    • Sheikh Muhamad Hizam Sheikh Khairuddin
    • Kamaruzzaman Ismail
    • Zalina Zainudin
    2018-10-07
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.15.23001
  • MEB, public-private partnership, feasibility study, teachers, regulators, fully privately run public schools, implementation, top view
  • Abstract

    The aim of this paper is to identify the perceptions of teachers and regulators in implementing fully privately run public schools (FPRPS) in Malaysia. Under the Malaysian Educational Blueprint (MEB) 2013 - 2025, it is clearly stated that the programs and activities that would encourage and allow parents, the public and private sectors, NGOs, and society to forge a partnership with the school will benefit especially concerning values education. These school community partnerships can be related to the ninth shift in the Blueprint which is “partnering with parents, community and private sector at scale,†although, the emphasis of this shift is more on students’ academic progress. This study was conducted for three months’ periods, involving 87 teachers and principals (in 13 schools) in the districts of Petaling Utama, Wilayah Bangsar-Pudu and Hulu Langat and 23 regulators in 10 Regulatory Bodies. The method used was in the form of focus group discussion (FGD). The data was processed by using Atlas ti. From the interviews conducted on FPRPS, all of the respondents (i.e. teachers, principals and regulators) indicated that they are ready and willing to accept the FPRPS implementation. This is because FPRS offers huge potential benefits to them. These include improvement in students’ skill, teacher training, academic performance, employability, financial support, infrastructures, facilities, security, maintenance, workload, and school efficiency. The study contributes to the development of a new type of school in Malaysia.

     

  • References

    1. [1] M. Afridi. PPPs in global education policy: Looking at the case of the Egyptian Education Initiative. Advances in Education in Diverse Communities: Research, Policy and Praxis, 12, (2017).

      [2] Verger, C. Fontdevila, and A. Zancajo. Multiple paths towards education privatization in a globalizing world: a cultural political economy. Journal of Education Policy, 32, 6, (2017).

      [3] L. Crawfurd. School management and public-private partnerships in Uganda. Journal of African Economies, 26, 5, (2017).

      [4] Ninth Malaysia Plan. http://www.epu.gov.my/en/rmk/ninth-malaysia-plan-2006-2010 (2006)

      [5] A. Hamilton. The Malaysian Trust School Model: It’s good but is it sustainable? Policy Ideas No 11, February (2014).

      [6] Asian Development Bank. Bangladesh: Public-Private Partnership in Higher Education Technical Assistance Consultant‟s Report, ADB.(2014).

      [7] J. Kumari. Public–private partnerships in education: An analysis with special reference to Indian school education system. International Journal of Educational Development, 47, (2016).

      [8] Mamat. Pengetua sekolah: Menangani isu dan cabaran kepimpinan. Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd. Kuala Lumpur (2001).

      [9] S. McCray, Y. N. Zhang, and J. Q. Chen. Preventing the achievement gap: Professional development in foundational mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Indianapolis, IN. (2011).

      [10] M. Harris. Interdisciplinary strategy and collaboration: a case study of American research universities, Journal of Research Administration. XLI, 1, (2010).

      [11] R. Briggs., I. Hall, D. Mercer, F. Smith, T. Swannm, and C. Falzon, C. Leading partnerships for 14-19 Education provision, Research Report, Centre for Excellence in Leadership (2007).

      [12] R. Benefer, D. Jenkins, and K. McFarlane. The HE in FE experience and culture for staff, Higher Education Learning Partnership [HELP] and Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning [CELT] Conference Proceedings (2009).

      [13] Bosma, R. Sieving, A. Ericson, P. Russ, L. Cavender, and M. Bonine. Elements for successful collaboration between K-8 school, community agency, and university partners: The lead peace partnership, Journal of School Health, 80, 10, (2010).

      [14] P. Rogers, A. Whitney, A. Bright, R. Cabe, T. Dewar, and S. Null. Rejoining the learning circle: when in-service providers conduct research, English Education, 43, 2, (2011).

      [15] Sigurdardottir. School-university partnership in teacher education for inclusive education, Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 10, 1, (2010).

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Muhamad Hizam Sheikh Khairuddin, S., Ismail, K., & Zainudin, Z. (2018). Implementing Fully Privately Run Public Schools: Top View. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.15), 252-256. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.15.23001

    Received date: 2018-12-03

    Accepted date: 2018-12-03

    Published date: 2018-10-07