Effect of DC-DC converter switching frequency on the performance of solar PV system

  • Authors

    • P. Srinivas VR siddhartha Engineering college
    • Dr. P.Swapna Andhra university
    • Dr. C.S.S.Anupama VR siddhartha Engineering college
    2019-02-15
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.23142
  • Impedance Matching, Incremental Conductance, Perturb and Observe, Photovoltaic System.

  • Abstract

    The performance of Photo Voltaic (PV) system depends on how effectively the impedance matching is maintained under climatic changes i.e. change in insolation and temperature. The Perturb and Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (InC) type classical Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) controllers with boost converter are used to maintain the desired impedance matching. The switching frequency of boost converter does play an important role in the overall performance of solar system. Due to the change in the switching frequency, various parameters such as settling time, peak over shoot, steady state response, MPPT voltage, MPPT current, maximum power and output voltage values are affected. The influence of these time domain specifications on the performance of the photovoltaic system with modification of above controllers is discussed in this paper. MATLAB/SIMULINK is used for simulation studies of solar PV system with modified InC and P&O controllers. The performance of the modified InC controller over P&O controller at different switching frequencies in transient, steady-state and dynamic responses, related to ripple, power loss, tracking speed and overshoot have been analyzed.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Chandra, Yogender Pal, Singh, Arashdeep, Kannojiya, Vikas, Kesari, J. P, Solar Energy a Path to India's Prosperity, Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India) Series C, (2018).

      [2] Kamarzaman, Tan, A comprehensive review of maximum power point tracking algorithms for photovoltaic systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 37, (2014) 585–598.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.045.

      [3] Seyedmahmoudian, Horan, Soon, Rahmani, Than Oo, Mekhilef, Stojcevski, State of the art artificial intelligence-based MPPT techniques for mitigating partial shadingeffects on PV systems – A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 64, (2016) 435–455.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.053.

      [4] Karami, Moubayed, Outbib, General review and classification of different MPPT Techniques. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 68, (2017) 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.132.

      [5] Aashoor FAO, Robinson FVP, A variable step size perturb and observe algorithm for photovoltaic maximum power point tracking. In: Proceedings of the 47th international Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC); 2012. p. 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2012.6398612.

      [6] Sera D, Kerekes T, Teodorescu R, Improved MPPT algorithms for rapidly changing environmental conditions. In: Proceedings of the international power electronics and motion control conference, Portoroz, Slovenia; 2006. p. 1614–9.

      [7] Al-Diab A, Sourkounis C, Variable step size P&O MPPT algorithm for PV systems. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on optimization of electrical and electronic equipment, Basov, New York, USA; 2010. p. 1097–102.https://doi.org/10.1109/OPTIM.2010.5510441.

      [8] Khaehintung N, Wiangtong T, Sirisuk P, FPGA implementation of MPPT using variable step-size P&O algorithm for PV applications. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on communications and information technologies; 2006. p. 212–5.https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCIT.2006.340033.

      [9] Liu F, Duan S, F. L, Liu B, Kang Y. A variable step size INC MPPT method for PV systems. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 2008;55(7):2622–8.https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2008.920550.

      [10] Hussein KH, Muta I, Hoshino T, Osakada M, Maximum photovoltaic power tracking: an algorithm for rapidly changing atmospheric conditions. In: Proceedings of IEE proceedings-generation, transmission and distribution; 1995. p. 59–64.https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-gtd:19951577.

      [11] Kchaou, Naamane, Koubaa, M’sirdi, Second order sliding mode-based MPPT control for photovoltaic applications. Sol. Energy 155, (2017) 758–769.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.07.007.

      [12] Palaniswamy, Srinivasan, Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy approach for power optimization in standalone photovoltaic systems. Sol. Energy 139, (2016) 213–220.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.09.027.

      [13] Kwan, Wu, High performance P&O based lock-on mechanism MPPT algorithm with smooth tracking. Sol. Energy 155, (2017) 816–828.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.07.026.

      [14] Kiranmai, Veerachary, Maximum power point tracking: a PSPICE circuit simulator approach. In: Power Electronics and Drives Systems, 2005 PEDS 2005. International Conference on, IEEE, (2005) 1072–1077.https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDS.2005.1619847.

      [15] Li G, Jin Y, Akram MW, Chen X, Ji Ji. Application of bio-inspired algorithms in maximum power point tracking for PV systems under partial shading conditions – a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81 (2018) 840–73.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.034.

      [16] Balamurugan M, Sahoo SK, Sukchai S. Application of soft computing methods for grid connected PV system: a technological and status review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75 (2017) 1493–508.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.210.

      [17] Mohapatra A, Nayak B, Das P, Mohanty KB. A review on MPPT techniques of PV system under partial shading condition. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 80 (2017) 854–67.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.083.

      [18] Kandemir E, Cetin NS, Borekci SA. Comprehensive overview of maximum power extraction methods for PV systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 78 (2017) 93–112.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.090.

      [19] Ramli MAM, Twaha S, Ishaque K, Al-Turki YA. A review on maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems with and without shading conditions. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 67 (2017) 144–59.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.013.

      [20] Balato, Costanzo, Gallo, Landi, Luiso, Vitelli, Design and implementation of a dynamic FPAA based photovoltaic emulator. Sol. Energy 123, (2016) 102–115.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.11.006.

      [21] Kadri, Andrei, Gaubert, Ivanovici, Champenois, Andrei, Modeling of the photovoltaic cell circuit parameters for optimum connection model and real-time emulatorwith partial shadow conditions. Energy 42, (2012) 57–67.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.10.018.

      [22] Ishaque, Salam, A review of maximum power point tracking techniques of PV system for uniform insolation and partial shading condition. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 19 (2013) 475–488.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.032.

      [23] T.esram, P.l.chapman, Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques, IEEE transactions on energy conversion. 22(2) (2007) 439-449.https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2006.874230.

      [24] Hart, Power Electronics. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, Valparaiso University, Indiana, (2011).

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Srinivas, P., P.Swapna, D., & C.S.S.Anupama, D. (2019). Effect of DC-DC converter switching frequency on the performance of solar PV system. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 4785-4790. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.23142

    Received date: 2018-12-04

    Accepted date: 2019-01-13

    Published date: 2019-02-15