Heuristics modelling for dynamic corporate performance assessment

  • Authors

    • Radhakrishnan Perumalsamy
    • Jeyanthi Natarajan
    2019-06-30
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.23145
  • Economic Value Added, Performance Modelling, Performance Assessment, Heuristic Methodology, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO).

  • Abstract

    A major goal of corporate performance is to maximize the shareholder’s value. Corporate performance is evaluated with the help of EVA (Economic Value Added).EVA concept is employed to ascertain if the organization contributed positively to shareholder’s wealth over a period of time. Efficient corporate performance management needs to capture the dynamic nature of the relevant factors occurring from multiple sources and when more number of Strategic Business Units(SBU) are involved , the complexity of the problem increases in the process. In this paper, an innovative heuristic methodology is proposed to generate necessary analytics to assess emerging corporate performance levels subject to the risk environment the company is operating in and to take appropriate mitigation measures to overcome inferior corporate performance.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] Alfred Rapport, “Creating Shareholder value, the new standard for Business Performance “, The Free Press ;( 1986).

      [2] Banerjee, A,†Economic Value Added: A Better Performance Measuresâ€, the Management Accountant, (1997), pp. 886-88.

      [3] Abdeen, A.M., & Haight, G.T, “A fresh look at economic value added: Empirical study of the Fortune 500 companiesâ€, Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol.18, No.: 2, (2002), pp. 27-36. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v18i2.2112.

      [4] Chen, S., & Dodd, J.L. “Economic value added (EVATM): An empirical examination of a new corporate performance measure. Journal of Managerial Issues, Vol.9, No.: 3, (1997), pp. 318-336.

      [5] Kyriazis, D, & Anastassis, C.,†The validity of the economic value-added approach: An empirical applicationâ€, European Financial Management, Vol.13, No.: 1, (2007), pp. 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2006.00286.x.

      [6] Young, S.D., & O’Byrne, S.F., EVA and value-based management: A practical guide to implementation. McGraw Hill, New York, (2001).

      [7] H. Lu, (2003), "Dynamic Population Strategy Assisted Particle Swarm Optimization in Multi objective Evolutionary Algorithm design," IEEE Neural Network Society, Final reports.

      [8] Radhakrishnan & Jeyanthi,†Innovative Heuristics Modeling for dynamic Supply-base Optimizationâ€, International Journal of Computational Engineering and Management, Vol. 21, No.: 2, (2018).

      [9] Radhakrishnan & Jeyanthi,†Innovative Heuristics Modeling for dynamic Supply-base Optimizationâ€, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, Vol.7, No.: 4, (2018), pp. 6137-6139.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Perumalsamy, R., & Natarajan, J. (2019). Heuristics modelling for dynamic corporate performance assessment. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 6437-6439. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.23145

    Received date: 2018-12-04

    Accepted date: 2019-05-31

    Published date: 2019-06-30