Comparison of Loss Characteristics of Coaxial Magnetic Gear According to Three Types

  • Authors

    • Jeong-In Lee
    • Kyung-Hun Shin
    • Tae-Kyoung Bang
    • Jang-Young Choi
    • Kyong-Hwan Kim
    • Keyyong Hong
    2018-12-13
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.39.23691
  • coaxial magnetic gear, consequent pole magnetic gear, reluctance magnetic gear, two-dimensional finite element analysis, core loss, PM loss.

  • Abstract

    Background/Objectives: Recently, there has been a problem of instability in rare earth prices worldwide. Due to these problems, various structures are being studied to minimize the use of permanent magnets.

    Methods/Statistical analysis: In this paper, we analyze the loss characteristics of three different types of coaxial magnetic gear (CMG)s using two - dimensional finite element analysis.

    Findings: This paper, 3 types of CMGs have been analyzed by using the 2-D FEA. The shapes used for the analysis are three types: Surface mounted coaxial magnetic gear (SMCMG), Consequent pole coaxial magnetic gear (CPCMG) and Reluctance coaxial magnetic gear (RCMG).The three types of gear ratios are all seven. For CPCMG and RCMG, the maximum torque is reduced as compared to SMCMG as the permanent magnet usage decreases. However, in case of loss, CPCMG is advantageous for PMloss and RCMG is for coreloss. The efficiency of SMCMG is advantageous, although the three types do not have much difference.

    Improvements/Applications: Through the two - dimensional finite element analysis, the results of analysis of the losses occurring in three types of magnetic gears were obtained.

     

     

  • References

    1. [1] S. H. Kia, H. Henao, & G. A. Capolino (2015). Gear Tooth Surface Damage Fault Detection Using Induction Machine Stator Current Space Vector Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 62(3), 1866-1878.

      [2] H.Shin,& J. Chang (2018). Comparison of Radial Force at Modulating Pieces in Coaxial Magnetic Gear and Magentic Geared Machine. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 54(3) Art no. 8101904.

      [3] L. Shah, A. Cruden, & B. W. Williams (2011). A Variable Speed Magnetic Gear Box Using Contra-Rotating Input Shafts. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 47(2), 431-438.

      [4] B. McHilton, R. Crozier, & M. Mueller (2017). Optimisation procedure for designing a magnetic gear. The Journal of Engineering, 2017(13), 840-843.

      [5] M. Chen, K. T. Chau, W. Li, C. Liu, & C. Qiu (2014). Design and Analysis of a New Magnetic Gear with Multiple Gear Ratios. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, 24(3), Art no. 0501904.

      [6] X. Li, M. Cheng, & Y. Wang (2017). Analysis design and experimental verification of a coaxial magnetic gear using stationary permanent-magnet ring. IET Electric Power Applications, 12(2), 231-238.

      [7] J. X. Shen, H. Y. Li, H. Hao, & M. J. Jin (2017). A Coaxial Magnetic Gear with Consequent-Pole Rotors. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion. 32(1), 267-275.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Lee, J.-I., Shin, K.-H., Bang, T.-K., Choi, J.-Y., Kim, K.-H., & Hong, K. (2018). Comparison of Loss Characteristics of Coaxial Magnetic Gear According to Three Types. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.39), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.39.23691

    Received date: 2018-12-11

    Accepted date: 2018-12-11

    Published date: 2018-12-13