Using Digital Documents and Materials in Civil and Arbitration Procedures

  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • References
  • PDF
  • Abstract

    The research topicality is due to the broad use of digital documents and materials in civil circulation, and the imperfection of the existing legislation in determining their legal status. This situation negatively influences the evidential significance of the digital documents and materials when presented in civil and arbitration procedures.

    The article objective is to reveal the lacunas in the legal regulation of digital documents and materials as evidences when investigating disputes in general and arbitration courts, and to elaborate proposals for their elimination.

    The key approach to the research was the legal analysis of legislative and departmental normative legal acts mentioning digital documents, and the analysis of special literature in this sphere of social relations.

    The main results of the research are: formulating the definition of a digital document setting its most general features and enabling to establish this definition as a legal one; setting the criteria for distinguishing a digital document and a digital material, an original and a copy of a digital document; defining digital documents and materials as direct or indirect evidences, depending on their evidential significance.

    The conclusions presented in the article can be used by legislators when correcting the norms of the Civil Procedural Code of the Russian Federation (CPC RF) and Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian Federation (APC RF), other special laws, and by judicial agencies when administering justice on civil cases.



  • Keywords

    law, document, copy, signature, evidence.

  • References

      [1] Bonner A.T. Traditional and non-traditional means of proving in civil and arbitration procedure. - Moscow: Prospekt, 2014. - Pp. 613.

      [2] Bonner A.T. Evidential significance of the information obtained from the Internet // Law. – 2007. - №12. – Pp. 85-98.

      [3] Vershinin A.P. Digital document: legal form and evidences in court. - Moscow: Gorodets, 2000. - P. 247.

      [4] Vorozhbit S.P. Digital means of proving in civil and arbitration procedure: PhD (Law) thesis. Saint Petersburg, 2011. - P. 25.

      [5] Goltsov V.B. Private legal relations in the functioning of units of the state system of emergencies prevention and elimination of the Russian Federation: Monograph. Khanty-Mansiysk, 2008. - p. 447.

      [6] GOST 50.1.021-2001. Recommendations on standardization. Information technologies of a product life cycle maintenance. Technological thesaurus. Part 1. Stages of a product life cycle (adopted and enacted by the Decree of the State Standards Agency of the Russian Federation of 02.07.2001 No. 256-ст).

      [7] Civil procedure: tutorial / Ed. M.K. Treushnikov. 2nd edition, improved and completed. – Moscow: Gorodets, 2007. - P. 784.

      [8] Dmitrik I.A. Means of implementing the civil rights and executing the liabilities using the Internet. Abstract of PhD (Law) thesis. Moscow, 2007. - P. 30. (access date 20.01.18)

      [9] Zhizhina M.V. Document as a carrier of evidential information in the modern civilistic procedure. (access date 18.01.2018).

      [10] Zemskov A.I. Digital publications: Special course syllabus. – MGUKI. Moscow, 2002- P. 40.

      [11] Zigura N.A. Computer information as a means of proving in the Russian criminal procedure. Abstract of PhD (Law) thesis. Chelyabinsk, 2010. - P. 20.

      [12] Larin M.V. Managing documentation in organizations: issues of history and methodology. Abstract of Doctoral (History) thesis. Moscow, 2000. – P. 30.

      [13] Medvedev I.G. Written evidences in the private law of Russia and France. - Saint Petersburg: Yuridicheskiy tsentr press, 2004. - P. 407.

      [14] Resolution of Federal Arbitration Court of Moscow district of 5.10.2000 in case No. КГ-А40/4465-00. (access date 19.01.18)

      [15] Popov V.A. Features of digital documents examination and their application as evidences in civil and arbitration procedures (access date 18.01.18)

      [16] Resolution of Federal Arbitration Court of the Far East district of 16.11.2012 No. Ф03-5177/2012. (access date 20.01.18)

      [17] Issues of registering the rights, establishing and certifying the facts of civil law: collection of articles / A.D. Batueva, Yu.V. Vinichenko, S.A. Gromov, et al.; Editor-in-Chief M.A. Rozhnova. – Moscow: Statut, 2013. – P. 336.

      [18] Reshetnikova I.V., Semenova A.V., Tsaregorodtseva E.A. Comment on court errors in the practice of APC RF implementation. Moscow, 2006. - P. 464.

      [19] Sedelnikova D.B. Issue of using digital evidences in civil and arbitration procedures // Law order: history, theory, practice. – 2017. - №2 (13). – Pp. 31-34.

      [20] Semiletov S.I. Documents and documentation as an object of legal regulation. Abstract of PhD (Law) thesis. Moscow, 2003. - P. 27.

      [21] Sinyakova M.V. Written evidences in civil and arbitration procedures. Abstract of PhD (Law) thesis. Moscow, 2007. P. 32.

      [22] Reference book on proving in civil legal procedure / Ed. I.V. Reshetnikova. 5th edition, improved and completed. – Moscow: Norma, Infra-M, 2011. – P. 496.

      [23] Temergalieva T.A. Digital documents as evidences in court // Juridical scientific network: // (access date 17.01.18)

      [24] Khalikov R.O. Digital digital signature and digital document as means of proving in civil and arbitration legal procedures // Proceedings of the Institute of Social and Humanitarian Knowledge and the Russian International Academy of Tourism. Joint edition. — Kazan, 2005. - Pp. 158-173.

      [25] Chorna O.I. Can digital documents be an evidence of duly fulfilled commitments? // Records management. - 2015. - № 1.

      [26] Yankovaya V.F. Digital document as an object of Documentation Studies. Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Series 2. Linguistics. 2013. №3 (19). (access date 18.01.18)

      [27] Stevenson K.L. Courts Confront Admissibility of Text and Instant Messages // American Bar Association. Litigation News Online. 2008.

      [28] US District Court for the Southern District of Florida.CX Digital Media, Inc. v. Smoking Everywhere, Inc. CaseN 09-62020-Civ. Judgment of 23 March 2011.

      [29] Han B. Building trust in e-commerce in China: Is the Electronic Signature Law enough? // ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. 2005. Pg. 23. ProQuest.

      [30] Digital signature legislation // Civil Engineering. 1998. №6. Pg 54. ProQuest.




Article ID: 23747
DOI: 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.36.23747

Copyright © 2012-2015 Science Publishing Corporation Inc. All rights reserved.