Innovation and quality processes in software development of Smes, in Baja California, Mexico
-
2019-06-30 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.23754 -
Software Processes, Innovation, Software Engineering, Quality and SPEM. -
Abstract
The objective of this article is to research the impact that innovation has in the development and quality of software production processes, and in turn, how innovation influences the profitability of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This research was carried out with a sample of 52 enterprises in the software area in Baja California, Mexico. The collection of data was made from June to September 2016, with the support of a survey aimed to the enterprises’ managers. For the analysis of the model and validation of structured relations, the factorial exploratory method of analysis was used, with support from Statistical package software for social sciences (SPSS), version 21. The results show that both innovation in the development and quality have a positive and significant influence over products innovation and in processes developed in SMEs. Furthermore, products’ quality has a positive and significant influence in the enterprises’ profitability.
Â
-
References
[1] Ali, et al. Critical factors impacting sustainability of continuous improvement in manufacturing industries in Malaysia. World Journal of Management, 2(3), pp. 65-80, 2010.
[2] Acuña et. al. La vinculación Universidad-Industria como instrumento de mejora para la competitividad de las empresas de desarrollo de Software del NEA. JUI 2015, 9º Jornadas de Vinculación Universidad-Industria. pp. 31-36, 2015.
[3] Benavides et al. Automated analysis in feature modelling and product configuration. In International Conference on Software Reuse (pp. 160-175). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38977-1_11.
[4] DÃaz, Ó, & Trujillo, S. LÃnea de Producto de Software. Publicado en “Fábricas de Software: experiencias, tecnologÃas y organización†2º edición, M. GPiattiniJGarzás (editores), Editorial Ra-Ma2010, 2010.
[5] DomÃnguez, V., & Bolaños, M. SPEM: Software process engineering metamodel. Revista Latinoamericana de Ingenieria de Software, 3(2), 92-100, 2015. https://doi.org/10.18294/relais.2015.92-100.
[6] Gacitúa, R. “Métodos de desarrollo de software: El desafÃo pendiente de la estandarización,†vol. 12, pp. 23-42, Universidad del BÃo BÃo, Chillán, Chile, 2003.
[7] Gallouj, F. & Savona, M. Innovation in services: a review of the debate and a research agenda, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19(2), pp. 149-172, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-008-0126-4.
[8] Hernández, et al. MetodologÃa de la investigación. Sexta Edición. Editorial Mc Graw Hill. México. 2014.
[9] Humphrey, W. Systems of Systems: Scaling up the Development Program (No. CMU/SEI-2006-TR-017). Carnegie-Mellon Univ Pittsburgh, Pa. Software Engineering Inst, 2006. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA454679.
[10] INEGI. Instituto Nacional de EstadÃstica, GeografÃa E informática. Censo Económico del Directorio EstadÃstico Nacional de UnidadesEconómicas (DENUE). Retrieved Enero, 24, 2017, 2014. from http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/app/mapa/denue/default.aspx.
[11] ISO/IEC TR 29110-5-1-2:2011- Software Engineering - Lifecycle Profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs) - Part 5-1-2: Management and engineering guide - Generic profile group: Basic profile, International Organization for Standardization/International lectrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
[12] Llerena, G. Experiencias en la implantación de un sistema de gestión de la calidad para el proceso de producción de software. Paper presented at the Convención Internacional.1-4, 2004.
[13] MartÃnez, et al. Representación de la Variabilidad en LÃneas de Productos de Software empleando Redes de Petri. 14th Argentine Symposium on Software Engineering (42 JAIIO - ASSE 2013). ISSN 1850-2792, pp. 127-14, 2013. http://42jaiio.sadio.org.ar/proceedings/simposios/Trabajos/ASSE/10.pdf.
[14] MejÃa, J., Iñiguez, F., & Muñoz, M. SMART-SPI: A data analysis model proposal for software process improvement. In Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2017 12th Iberian Conference on pp. 1-7. IEEE, 2017. https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2017.7975917.
[15] Menéndez, V., & Castellanos, M. SPEM: Software process engineering metamodel. Revista Latinoamericana de Ingenieria de Software, 3(2), 92-100, 2015. https://doi.org/10.18294/relais.2015.92-100.
[16] Metzger, A. y Pohl, K. Software product line engineering and variability management: achievements and challenges. In Proceedings of the on Future of Software Engineering, pp. 70-84, 2014. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2593888. https://doi.org/10.1145/2593882.2593888.
[17] Miranda, M., Casas, S., & Marcos, C. Análisis de desarrollo de software orientado a Feature-LÃnea de producto de Software para Aplicaciones de TVDI. Informes CientÃficos-Técnicos UNPA, 7(2), pp. 167-19, 2015. https://doi.org/10.22305/ict-unpa.v7i2.132.
[18] Morero, A., Borrastero, C., & Motta, J. Procesos de innovación en la producción de software en argentina. Un estudio de caso. Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda Época, (2), pp. 24-48, 2015.
[19] Object Management Group (OMG). “Software Process Engineering Metamodel (SPEM) Specificationâ€, version 2.0, 2004.
[20] Pino, et al. “Software process improvement in small and medium software enterprises: a systematic reviewâ€. En Software Quality Journal, 16 (2), pp. 237-261, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-007-9038-z.
[21] RodrÃguez et al. Organización de Conocimientos en Procesos de IngenierÃa de Software por Medio de Modelado de Procesos: una Adaptación de SPEM. JIISIC, 7, 257-265, 2007.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
Carlos Valdés Hernández, R., Luis Arcos Vega, J., & Fernando González Navarro, F. (2019). Innovation and quality processes in software development of Smes, in Baja California, Mexico. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4), 6464-6467. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.23754Received date: 2018-12-12
Accepted date: 2019-05-25
Published date: 2019-06-30