Comparison of Image Distribution Schemes in a Wireless Presentation System
-
Received date: December 14, 2018
Accepted date: December 14, 2018
Published date: December 9, 2018
https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.36.23911
-
wireless presentation system, image distribution, video quality, transfer rate throttling, optimization -
Abstract
We proposed and compared several image distribution schemes for the webviewer scenario in a wireless presentation session. Simulation study showed that by optimizing the image transmission rate, a good tradeoff solution that maximizes the combined weighted video and image quality could be achieved.
Â
Â
-
References
[1] G. J. Sullivan and T. Wiegand, “Video Compression - From Concepts to the H.264/AVC Standard,†Proc. IEEE, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 18–31, Jan. 2005.
[2] “VideoLAN - x264, the best H.264/AVC encoder.†[Online]. Available: http://www.videolan.org/developers/x264.html.
[3] “x265 HEVC Encoder / H.265 Video Codec.†[Online]. Available: http://x265.org/.
[4] “wePresent WiPG-2000 | wePresent 2000 Advanced Wireless Projection System.†[Online]. Available: http://www.wepresentwifi.com/wipg2000.html.
[5] “Extron Electronics - ShareLink 250 Series.†[Online]. Available: http://www.extron.com/company/article.aspx?id=sharelink200ad.
[6] “iPerf - The TCP, UDP and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool.†[Online]. Available: https://iperf.fr/.
[7] “The Network Simulator - ns-2.†[Online]. Available: http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/. [Accessed: 14-Nov-2012].
[8] D. Vassis, G. Kormentzas, A. Rouskas, and I. Maglogiannis, “The IEEE 802.11g standard for high data rate WLANs,†IEEE Netw., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 21–26, May 2005.
[9] L. Villaseñor-González, “A Performance Study of the IEEE 802.11g PHY and MAC Layers over Heterogeneous and Homogeneous WLANs,†Ing. Investig. y Tecnol., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 45–57, 2007.
-
Downloads
-
How to Cite
X. Kok, G., & N. Choong, K. (2018). Comparison of Image Distribution Schemes in a Wireless Presentation System. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(4.36), 434-439. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.36.23911Received date: December 14, 2018
Accepted date: December 14, 2018
Published date: December 9, 2018