Acceptance Model of Web 2.0 Technology in self-learning: the perspective of TOE and STS

  • Authors

    • Yohana Dewi Lulu Widyasari
    • Lukito Edi Nugroho
    • Adhistya Erna Permanasari
    2018-12-16
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.40.24026
  • Technology web2.0, self-learning, TOE, STS

  • The development of web 2.0 technology has an impact on the communication and collaboration processes carried out by its users. The use of social technology in the formal organizational environment and for formal needs is influenced by several factors. The TOE and STS aspects are used to understand the use of this technology for formal learning purposes that are carried out independently or self-learning. The TOE aspect is used to analyze technology components in relation to the organization and environment that uses it. The STS aspect is used to see the suitability of the technology to the task and its users including from the social side. Acceptance of social technology attached to web 2.0 technology by students by utilizing for the learning process need to be analyzed. The use of social media for the self-learning process shows that perceived behavior control does not significantly affect the intention of its users. User intention on social media in the self-learning process is influenced by the attitude and subjective norms of its users. The social influence brought by web 2.0 technology influences the subjective norms of its users.

     

  • References

    1. [1] R. Newman, V. Chang, R. J. Walters, and G. B. Wills, "Web 2.0—The past and the future," International Journal of Information Management, vol. 36, pp. 591-598, 8// 2016.

      [2] Y. D. L. Widyasari, L. E. Nugroho, and A. E. Permanasari, "The benefit of the Web 2.0 technologies in higher education: Student's perspectives," in 2016 3rd International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE), 2016, pp. 278-282.

      [3] F. Alqahtani, J. Watson, and H. Partridge, "Organizational support and Enterprise Web 2.0 adoption: a qualitative study," in Twentieth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Savannah, 2014.

      [4] M. E. Porter, Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance: Simon and Schuster, 2008.

      [5] J. Ward, P. M. Griffiths, and P. Whitmore, Strategic planning for information systems vol. 28: J. Wiley, 2002.

      [6] J. Y. Thong, "An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses," Journal of management information systems, vol. 15, pp. 187-214, 1999.

      [7] B. H. Hall and B. Khan, "Adoption of New Technology," National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc2003.

      [8] G. Ditsa, S. Alwahaishi, S. Al-Kobaisi, and V. Snášel, "A Comparative Study of the Effects of Culture on the Deployment of Information Technology," Technology Diffusion and Adoption: Global Complexity, Global Innovation: Global Complexity, Global Innovation, p. 77, 2013.

      [9] J. Hartono, "Adoption of Information Technology on Small Businesses: The Role of Environment, Organizational and Leader Determinant," International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, vol. Vol. 2, 2012.

      [10] L. Tornatzky and M. Fleischer, "The processes of technological innovation," 1990.

      [11] F. D. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS quarterly, pp. 319-340, 1989.

      [12] J. Lee and E. Suh, "An Empirical Study of the Factors Influencing Use of Social Network Service," in PACIS, 2013, p. 181.

      [13] M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, 1975.

      [14] V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, "A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies," Management science, vol. 46, pp. 186-204, 2000.

      [15] A. Morris, "Socio-technical systems in ICT: A comprehensive survey," 2009.

      [16] R. P. Bostrom and J. S. Heinen, "MIS problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective, part II: the application of socio-technical theory," MIS quarterly, pp. 11-28, 1977.

      [17] P. P.-Y. Wu, C. Fookes, J. Pitchforth, and K. Mengersen, "A Framework for Model Integration and Holistic Modelling of Socio-Technical Systems," Decision Support Systems, 2015.

      [18] G. J. Baxter and A. J. Hester, "Socio-technical systems theory as a diagnostic tool for examining underutilization of wiki technology," The Learning Organization, vol. 21, pp. 48-68, 2014.

      [19] G. Anthony, "Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration," ed: Polity Press, 1989.

      [20] W. J. Orlikowski, "Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations," in Resources, co-evolution and artifacts, ed: Springer, 2008, pp. 255-305.

      [21] R. Badham, C. Clegg, and T. Wall, "Socio-technical theory," Handbook of Ergonomics. New York, NY: John Wiley, 2000.

      [22] F. Ataie, A. Shah, F. Bagheri, N. I. Ali, M. Mohammadgholipour, B. Rezaie, et al., "Web 2.0-Based Collaborative Learning Framework Promoting Lifelong Learning: Developing Sustainability Competencies," International Journal of Engineering & Technology, vol. 7, pp. 89-92, 2018.

      [23] Y. D. L. Widyasari, L. E. Nugroho, and A. E. Permanasari, "Persuasiveness of Web 2.0 Technologies in an Educational Context," Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), vol. 10, pp. 177-181, 2018.

      [24] F. D. Davis, "Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology," MIS Q., vol. 13, pp. 319-340, 1989.

      [25] V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view," MIS quarterly, pp. 425-478, 2003.

      [26] R. E. Guadagno and R. B. Cialdini, "Preference for consistency and social influence: A review of current research findings," Social Influence, vol. 5, pp. 152-163, 2010.

      [27] Ajzen, "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational behavior and human decision processes, vol. 50, pp. 179-211, 1991.

      [28] A. H. Eagly, Chaiken, S. , The psychology of attitudes. . Orlando: FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College, 1993.

      [29] F. D. Davis, R. P. Bagozzi, and P. R. Warshaw, "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models," Management science, vol. 35, pp. 982-1003, 1989.

      [30] Y. Malhotra and D. Galletta, "A multidimensional commitment model of volitional systems adoption and usage behavior," Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 22, pp. 117-151, 2005.

      [31] A. Bandura and R. H. Walters, "Social learning theory," 1977.

      [32] A. Bandura, "Social cognitive theory of mass communication," Media psychology, vol. 3, pp. 265-299, 2001.

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    Dewi Lulu Widyasari, Y., Edi Nugroho, L., & Erna Permanasari, A. (2018). Acceptance Model of Web 2.0 Technology in self-learning: the perspective of TOE and STS. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.40), 15-20. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.40.24026