Mongolian Trace in the Criminal Penalties Institute in Buryat Society of the Russian Empire in XIX Century

  • Authors

    • Yuri P. Garmaev
    • Navaan Gantulga
    • Yuri V. Kharmaev
    2018-12-03
    https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24348
  • Russian Empire, Mongolia, criminal penalties system, foreign and historical experience, border states, Buryat society, collective responsibility, crime prevention.

  • Abstract

    The article is devoted to a scientific study of the criminal penalties status in the Russian Empire of the XIX century in its outlying areas, in particular Transbaikal territory, mainly populated by the Buryats. The modern local institution of criminal penalties is justly criticize due to unsatisfactory implementation of criminal responsibility and the failure to achieve the main goals of penalties in society. The solution of pending problems in this field is impossible without taking into account, both historical and positive foreign experience. Empirical methods of comparison, description, interpretation; theoretical methods of formal and dialectic logic. It is interesting to see the experience of criminal penalties in the Russian Empire of the XIX century in Buryat society, which seamlessly combine both Russian traditions and the customs of the neighboring Mongolian state. Legal regulation of the outlying territories of the Russian Empire in the XIX century, in the context of preventing criminal acts is based on the peculiarities of delineation of legal proceedings depending on categories of the crimes committed. As the study reveals, prevention of new crimes in the outlying territories of the Russian Empire in XIX century (in the Buryat society) and correction of the offender were achieved primarily through public institutions (local government, tribal and clan communities). We believe that in modern conditions, along with the state institutions of subjects of prevention, the possibility of preventive measures by the mentioned institutions should not be discounted.

     

     


     

  • References

    1. [1] Beccaria Ch (1995), O prestupleniyakh i nakazanieakh [About crimes and punishments]. Moscow, 258 p.

      [2] Albanese J (1990), Myths and Realities of Crime and Justice: 3rd ed. N.Y.: Apocalypse Publishing, Co.

      [3] Fishbein D (2001), Biobehavioral Perspectives in Criminology. Wadsworth: Thomson Learning.

      [4] Chistyakov OI (1988), Zakonodatel'stvo pervoy poloviny XIX veka. Rossiiskoe zakonodatel’stvo X–XX vekov v 9 tomah [Russian legislation of X-XX centuries], Volume 6. Moscow, 432 p.

      [5] Henry S, Milovanovic D (1996), Constitutive Criminology. Beyond Postmodernism. London, SAGE Publications.

      [6] Binsung H (2015), Reflection of the Traditional Theories of Punishment. Beijing, 142 p.

      [7] Stephan JJ (2004), State Prison Expenditures, 2001. Bureau of justice statistics: special report NCJ No 202949. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 10 p.

      [8] Skiba AP, Rodionov AV (2016), O reanimatsii ssilki kak ugolovnogo nakazaniya: pravovye i economicheskie problemy [About the resuscitation of the reference as a criminal punishment: legal and economic problems]. Ugolovno-ispolnitelnoe pravo 4(26), pp: 17.

      [9] Stromov VYu (2014), Effektivnost` otechestvennoi sistemy nakazaniy: problem ugolovno-pravovoi teorii I pravoprimenitelnoi praktiki [Effectiveness of the domestic system of punishments: problems of criminal law theory and law enforcement practice]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta 6(134), pp: 199-204.

      [10] Nechaev AD, Usalev VV (2015), Problemy sozdaniya uchrezhdeniy, ispolnyaushikh nakazaniya v vide aresta [Problems of creating institutions that carry out sentences in the form of arrest]. Voprosy sovremennoi urisprudentsii: sb.st. po mater. XLVII mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., No. 3(45). Novosibirsk: SibAK.

      [11] Gantulga N, Kharmaev YuV (2015), Nekotorye voprosy resotsializatsii osuzhdennykh v Mongolii [Some issues of the re-socialization of convicts in Mongolia]. Vserossiyskiy kriminologichtskiy zhurnal 9(2), pp: 378-384.

      [12] Kharmaev YuV (2015), Osobennosti institute ugolovnykh nakazaniy v srednevekovoi Mongolii [Features of the institution of criminal punishment in medieval Mongolia]. Sociologiya ugolovnogo prava i ugolvnoi otvetstvennosti: Sbornik statey. Moscow, Urisprudentsiya, 264 p.

      [13] Vladimirtsov BYa (1934), Obshestvenniy stroi mongolov. Mongolskiy kochevoi feodalizm [Social structure of the Mongol. Mongolian nomadic feudalism]. Leningrad.

      [14] Shestopalov AP, Fumm AM (2015), Ulozhenie o nakazaniyakh ugolovnikh i ispravitel’nikh 1845 goda v sisteme istochnikov ugolovnogo prava Rossiiskoi imperii [The code of Criminal and Correctional Penalties of 1845 in the system of sources of criminal law of the Russian Empire]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gumanitarno-economicheskogo instituta 3(2), pp: 69-73.

      [15] Velikaya yasa Chingiskhana, "Vosemnadtsat stepnykh zakonov" XVI–XVII v.v., Velikoe ulogenie 1640 g.; Russkaya Pravda, Sudebnik 1497 i 1550 g.g., Sobornoe ulogenie 1649 g.

      [16] Boldbaatar G, Lundejantsan D (1997), Mongolin tor erkhzuin tuukhenulamglal. UB., 9 dakhtal.

      [17] Sodovsuren B (1911-1920), Mongol-Oiradin kuul’ tsaazin bichig. Huv’sgalin omnokh mongolin top ba huul’ tsaaz. UB., 10 dah’ tal.

      [18] Kichanov EI (1997), Kochevie gosudarstva ot gunnov do man’zhurov [Nomadic states from the Huns to the Manchus]. Moscow, Vostochnaya literatura.

      [19] Nasilov AD (1987), Vosemnadtsat’ stepnikh zakonov [Eighteen Steppe Laws] available online: http://www.vostlit.info/Texts/
      Dokumenty/Mongol/18_stepnych-_zakonov/vved.phtml?id=4422

      [20] Golstunskiy KF (1880), Mongolo-oiratskie zakoni 1640 goda [The Mongolian-Oirot Acts of 1640], available online: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/8908, last visit: 11.06.2017.

      [21] Zhalsanova BT, Zhambalov DZ, Kuras LV (2017) Nakazaniya po ugolovnym delam khorinskikh buryat v XIX v. [Punishment in criminal cases of the Khorin Buryats in the XIXth century]. Sibirskaya ssilka: sbornik statei 8(20). Irkutsk, Izd-vo "Ottisk", pp: 90-104.

      [22] Tsibikov BD (1992), Obychnoe pravo khorinskikh buryat: pamyatniki staromongolskoi pismennosti [The customary right of the Chorin Buryats: monuments of Old Mongolian script]. Novosibirsk, VO Nauka, 312 p.

      [23] Polozhenie 11 khorinskikh rodov 1808 g. po upravleniu vnutrennimi delami i sudoproizvodstvu (1992). Novosibirsk, 40 p.

      [24] Shesler AV (2015), Kontseptsiya ugolovno-pravovoi politiki Rossiskoi Federatsii ob ugolovnikh nakazaniyakh [The concept of criminal law policy of the Russian Federation on criminal penalties]. Vestnik Kuzbasskogo institute 3(24), pp: 129-135.

      [25] Vladimirtsov BYa (1934), Obshestvennii stroi mongolov. Mongol’skiy kochevoi feodalizm [The social structure of the Mongols. Mongolian nomadic feudalism]. Leningrad, Izd-vo AS USSR, available online: http://kronk.spb.ru/library/vladimirzov-bya-1934

  • Downloads

  • How to Cite

    P. Garmaev, Y., Gantulga, N., & V. Kharmaev, Y. (2018). Mongolian Trace in the Criminal Penalties Institute in Buryat Society of the Russian Empire in XIX Century. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.38), 174-178. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.38.24348

    Received date: 2018-12-18

    Accepted date: 2018-12-18

    Published date: 2018-12-03